Jump to content

Dirty Herky

Registered User
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Dirty Herky

  1. Dirty Herky

    USAA

    Well considering it is Japan that is good to know. Guess I will look elsewhere. Thanks for the heads up.
  2. Dirty Herky

    USAA

    Let me know if this is in another thread but I couldn't find it. Even as bad as USAA is being made out here, is it still worth having OCONUS for insurance/banking? Recently found out I'll be PCSing before the end of the year is out and was leaning towards moving things with USAA since they get the "military" thing and would be more understanding about overseas. Biggest things I can think of needing is rental insurance for on-base housing and maybe car insurance. Any advice would be greatly appreciated especially if I'm missing anything.
  3. Coming up on a decade old but.... https://www.duffelblog.com/p/ukraine-invades-russia?utm_source=url
  4. Pardon the ignorance as most of this talk is over the tactical level I think of on a daily basis and moves a lot faster but it seems like this is focusing on lighter fighters as an all or nothing and not the integration of it with everything else. We don’t need a plane, manned or unmanned, that can do everything alone. I’m sure there has to be a way to scale light fighters, MUMT, AI, etc. discussed on this thread and others. If you have a dedicated platform, like a light fighter, it can be upgraded and advanced with the advancement of the tech. Even the relatively new C-130J is getting a block upgrade finally to give us the ability to finally fly RNAV and its all in the computer(s). Then you can scale to the fight/threat based on the level AI. Low AI, keep it within the Loyal Wingman system where it has close control from a manned fighter. Better AI, let a KC-46/AWACS type C2 system sit back out of the WEZ and pick targets on a map and let them go do their thing. While you are doing a plug and play with the AI why not the mission focus as well. The concept was used with the Littoral Combat Ships with modular mission modules. Need a missile truck well load the bad boy up with AIM-120s. Need EW/EA, fill the mission bay with jammers. ISR, sensors and a sniper pod or something. Need more range on the link then throw a relay in the plane. Scale it to the threat with formation make-up. Flying DCA/OCA then probably more missile wingman. SEAD, maybe a mix of EW and missiles. Depending on the level of AI it won’t matter if it’s an F-35 controlling 1-7 of them of a larger C2 plane controlling multiple flights. Without knowing a lot, a light fighter seems to fit the bill. Small enough RCS to be survivable enough in a peer fight to make the potential loss justifiable with the ALR. Fast enough to employ with manned fighters. It would also be cheaper to employ in a lower level flight were we can now save flight time of manned fighters on other more pressing engagements. Again, sorry it this is irrelevant to the thread or if I am talking out my ass. It’s been known to happen more times than not. Standing by for spears.
  5. Second this. I have been planning a small OST (2x C-130s) to meet up with some F-22s and a STS for some ACE and other training. In the 4 months of planning and coordinating I have had 2 versions of the CONOP and 5 versions of the itinerary/DLOs before it ever got above the SQ/DO because the DLOs planned "weren't enough" to warrant 2 tails offstation for 5 days when we have local beans to accomplish, let alone HHQ taskings. OST is supposed to leave 6 Jun but Wing level approval is still standing by.
×
×
  • Create New...