BashiChuni
-
Posts
2,188 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
58
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Downloads
Wiki
Posts posted by BashiChuni
-
-
10 hours ago, Lawman said:
Same is true when you are telling us all not to be “fooled by the narrative” and listening to a podcast hosted by RT and funded by mysterious sources.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk"fooled by the narrative"
like the narrative that the ukranian 2023 offensive disastrously failed? that russia has momentum and is advancing?
what narrative are you presenting...are you saying Ukraine is winning and everything is fine? because that's not the facts at this moment.
you guys have this idea that sprinkling magical money into this conflict will generate an auto win for Ukraine. all i'm saying is that will not happen. why does that make me a "russian propaganda agent"?
there are actual FACTS presented in the Duran podcast...not political platitudes being espoused by western politicians...one who finds himself in a election cycle.
-
18 hours ago, Lawman said:
In this case you are quoting a literal Russian Psyop outlet.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalkhmmmm i seem to remember people like you and the western media calling anyone who didn't question the COVID narrative guilty of peddling "fake news" and "misinformation"
hell if you're against the latest Ukranian spending package one finds themselves labeled "pro-russian" and "anti-democracy".
the facts on the battlefield and the analysis done by the Duran podcast match up. if that's considered Russian "fake news" then you're no better than Baghdad Bob.
-
US considering sending more "advisors" to Ukraine?
gee, where have we heard that before? how'd that work out for us last time?
-
the duran podcast has been FAR more accurate about what is happening in Ukraine than any western media outlet.
david sacks was recently a guest on their podcast. are you calling david sacks a russian shrill? hardly.
the truth will eventually come out (like COVID) and you will be shown to be a fool. hell you haven't even listened to any of the podcast! just parroting what you have found online that suits your narrative.
-
ah yes the "you don't agree with my view point so you are russian propaganda" view.
very persuasive!
david sacks. known KGB agent.
-
-
Downvote all you want nsplayer. Facts don’t care about your feelings
-
1
-
-
20 minutes ago, Danger41 said:
Where do you guys look for all this info? Genuinely curious.
The Duran podcast. Highly recommend
-
1
-
-
2 hours ago, raimius said:
The lines have shifted several times. You seem to only recognize one direction.
The initial thrust of the invasion stopped, followed by counter-attacks by both sides...doesn't sound like the one-sided war you seem to be describing.
what direction is it going in now?
we can all want ukraine to win, that doesn't change the facts on the battlefield. nor the calculus to make a victory happen.
ukraine can only defeat russia with direct NATO intervention.
-
two points:
1. they are not blunting anything
2. they are not stopping russian advances.
russia is clearly advancing, capturing territory, and clearly winning this war. and they will win regardless of how much money/ammo we give them.
-
1
-
-
hmm strange i was able to see it without a subscription.
BL: the math doesnt add up i.e. we can produce about 5-10% of required ammunition
-
-
GC was an amazing boss and leader
-
2 hours ago, FourFans said:
Have you done any international assignments?
i never deployed
-
2
-
-
im not referencing him specifically. i'm saying generally. clearly there is big tech censorship. thats proven and not conspiracy.
i'm saying if big tech will censor a person, why is it hard to believe massive investment banks wouldn't influence elections?
-
1
-
-
15 hours ago, Day Man said:
care to extrapolate on your conspiracy theory?
if big tech censors individual facebook posts and youtube videos you don't think the most powerful and wealthy corporations in the world would put their finger on the scale of a presidential election for the most powerful office in human history?
it's not a conspiracy theory. you're just incredibly naive and totally plugged into the system.
-
1 hour ago, Lord Ratner said:
If you establish that you are going to feed someone, then stop feeding them without sufficient time or opportunity to feed themselves, then yes, you are starving them. You can argue whether you should have fed them in the first place, but once you establish a relationship, what you do in that relationship matters.
i would like to thank you for proving my point about post WWII foreign policy being a disaster.
we constantly do what you just described above to "allies". i'm not sure why anyone is surprised we're doing it to ukraine.
and yes, i do argue that we should stop feeding
-
24 minutes ago, ClearedHot said:
The you have to teach them how to fish...It is not like they know how to make the Javelin, ATACM, and M-1 Abrams...and maybe in the long run you don't want them to know how.
CH you're a reasonable poster on here.
do you honestly think ukraine could defeat russia on the battlefield with unlimited weaponry?
-
im tired of the 1930 germany comparisons.
putin has shown zero interest in conquering europe. all talk of russia marching to paris if we dont stop them at ukraine is total fear mongering.
-
1
-
-
because ukraine has NEVER been a US national security concern. we have never and will never care about ukraine.
it's apples to oranges.
-
51 minutes ago, Lord Ratner said:
This is an ironic thing to say considering they have been starved of the weaponry required to fight. If I were a bit more cynical I would say you are being intentionally disingenuous.
We shouldn't be sending them money or weapons!
*We stop sending them money and weapons.*
See!? They are losing, so there's no point in sending the money or weaponry!
they have not been starved of the weaponry.
you could give ukraine 600b and it wouldn't matter. it's a numbers game. russia has far more men to fight ukraine.
and the russian industrial base is ramping up to full speed. russian army is 15% larger now than when the war began. some of you guys need to brush up on your history about how the russian bear conducts war.
let me repeat: there is ZERO chance ukraine will win this war. it's a losing proposition. what we SHOULD be doing is working towards a negotiated settlement.
-
1
-
-
i'm seeing a familiar trend of the west focusing on small tactical victories and missing the major strategic loss. great they shot down a bomber.
but that won't prevent them from losing the war.
it's amazing that such professionally educated officers can't grasp ukraine is losing. badly. and they have zero chance of beating russia.
-
1
-
-
don't
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, FourFans said:
Who would you prefer, specifically?
none of the clinton/obama tree democrats...and certainly none of the john bolton/pompeo republicans.
which significantly narrows the list. the problem is the bureaucrats promote each other...it truly is entrenched. the professional political class has really fucked up what our country was meant to be.
-
1
-
Russian Ukraine shenanigans
in General Discussion
Posted
choose your fighter. i'd take the russian.