HeloDude

Reducing taxes on people who make more money is not “giving” them anything…it was their money to begin with. And “taking away” from the poor is not taking anything from them as was never their resources to begin with.

With regards to progressives complaining about the cuts, this is nothing new. In 2013 Pelosi said there wasn’t room to cut anything…and now we’re paying for DEI stuff overseas, promoting trans nonsense in other countries, paying hotels for illegals here in the US, on and on. It’s almost hard to fathom how the left is defending this crap, but that’s just who they are/how they think. https://www.politico.com/blogs/politico-now/2013/09/pelosi-says-the-cupboard-is-bare-173214

Progressives are upset that Trump is doing a lot of what he said he would do, and yet, non-progressives are supposed to be upset as well? And I love the “unconstitutional” part of what Trump is doing…this is their new catchphrase since the Musk Nazi-salute nonsense didn’t work.

^^^Too funny coming from the guy who said Biden was doing a good job as president

Perhaps we’re talking past each other. I’m for cutting waste, cutting overall spending, and cutting taxes. I’m probably one of the few on here who is for cutting welfare and the defense budget. As for social security and Medicare, that Ponzi scheme was never going to work and was doomed to failed, just like any other Ponzi scheme.

Your original post was about “tax cuts for billionaires”, was it not? So if those progressives who are against tax cuts, my question is why don’t these same progressives give back their tax cuts to the government? Your response above literally had nothing to do with the tax cuts.

Funny how progressives never give back their savings from tax cuts back to the government…

Tulsi is in. Curious as to what she’ll do in the next several weeks now that she’s in charge of the intel community. The intel community/progressives were fervently against her so there must be a reason they were so worried.

Then why was the previous administration so focused on changing it?

Yep…(checks own username)—I agree.

You said they need to have VHF…I am willing to bet they most definitely had VHF. As for what frequencies/radios they were using, that could be a procedural question/issue. The H-60s flying around Iraq in 2008 (most likely Lima models as the Mike models were still pretty new then) had VHF radios, and from what I can tell, the one involved in this crash was a Lima model.

Did they not have a VHF radio?

Wait, you mean they might not join us in invading the next country we decide to take over?…kind of like how they decided to not invade the last country we went into?

You can’t even provide a prediction of when you’ll think this will happen…but yet you’re actually worried it will happen. So yes, you’re just being emotional. It’s easy for me, I’m not concerned at all that it will happen.

So you’re so worried that he’ll do it (because you must think he will), but yet you don’t want to bet on your prediction coming true? When is this going to happen?…that way we can all call you out on your nonsense when it doesn’t happen. Dude, you’re pretty emotional right now (again). I recommend you sit a few plays out, seriously.

I’m retired bro lol. As for people deploying to anywhere for any reason, yeah, that’s part of the job—whether we like it or not. That all be said, when Trump deploys troops take control of Gaza, I’ll eat my words. But since you’re so concerned, let’s make a bet if that will happen in the next 1-2 year. What are your terms?

So your original post about not paying your taxes was lame, as I expected…got it. And you’ve been upset with Trump for several years, so this is just another TDS rant. Your post reminded me of this recent nonsense: https://www.foxnews.com/politics/new-jersey-governor-houses-migrant-house-tells-feds-good-luck-trying-get-her

People never tried cheating on their taxes before 2025? Also, I’m willing to bet a sizable amount of money that you’ll pay your taxes (the IRS cares much more that you pay your taxes, not that you file them)…so your example is as weak as your threat. Also your TDS is once again noted.

This is much more about reducing the size of government/federal employees than it is getting people back into the office. But since it’s extremely difficult to fire/layoff a federal employee, getting them to leave on their own sounds like the next best thing. Do we really need 2.4 million federal employees?…and that’s not even counting the military or those working for the post office.

For some reason I don’t seem to care what the progressives think about Trump or his team/what they’re doing for the country, when those same progressives over the last decade have told us how evil the US is…

Sounds a lot of like when the left blames the right, gun manufacturers, lack of gun control, etc after a shooting before the bodies are cold. They sadly both do it and it’s all bad IMO, so I definitely agree with you that this specific one is bad on Trump. This is the sickness of our politics.

Pretty sure none were dishonorably discharged, at least for only refusing the shot.

Pawman is having another mental breakdown over this…

I already said I support Trump’s plan, you don’t need to sell me on it… End the massive welfare state we have and people will go back to work. And if we “need” more workers (ie we don’t have any enough citizens to work after the welfare is cut), then we let people in to do those jobs, but with massive conditions. Progressives just want new voters…and if you don’t believe me, put up a bill where nonviolent illegal aliens get to stay but they never get to apply for citizenship. They’ll never go for it.