Jump to content

ThreeHoler

Supreme User
  • Posts

    2,320
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    27

Everything posted by ThreeHoler

  1. CCs can't be removed because of a SIB report. AIB? Yes. SIB? No.
  2. Why you gotta make fun of a Quagmire FTU sortie like that?
  3. I find it really hard to believe that someone with the creds you listed would only get a P solely because of no AAD since it is a 75% allocation rate. However, if all his bros had a degree and he didn't...he self-eliminated. I say this as someone who met an O-4 board without an AAD and has never been an exec.
  4. I know people who PC'd with >2 years on their ADSC and people who were denied with ~15 months remaining.
  5. I wasn't referring to any specific incident. I could have said: Photo of penny wedged in circuit breaker panel...releasable. Photo of finger pointing to penny wedged into circuit breaker panel...not releasable. Just trying to make the difference between the SIB's Part I and Part II understandable.
  6. We just had a prior Nav meet his O-4 board as a copilot. Um, I mean FPQ. Stupid newfangled terms. I miss the simplicity of MC. Now there are fucking FPNs, FPCs FPQs, FPLs, and FPKs. Anyway, he did fine. It remains to be seen what happens next.
  7. I was hoping you could make a PowerPoint... Short answer, Part I is factual information and is releasable. It includes things like photos without analysis and names of people who were interviewed. It must not include analysis, privileged testimony, or findings. It is normally only released to the AIB. Example: photo of cockpit panel with gear handle up is factual and releasable. Same photo with person's finger pointing to the gear handle is privileged and is not releasable. If someone releases privileged information, they are subject to disciplinary action. You can now log off your annual privilege brief...
  8. http://www.e-publishing.af.mil/shared/media/epubs/afi91-204.pdf
  9. Part I of an SIB will not give you anything useful.
  10. The best part about that video is Houck's giant Folex.
  11. Embry has been charging $1000 per class for years. Guess TUI just figured out they could still beat Embry's ridiculous price and still make more money. If you're a cheap fucker like me, you'll do the free degree from AU.
  12. http://www.groupon.com/deals/groupon-baby WTF
  13. AMC put out a command-wide policy that limits the number of people who can make group authorizations. At least that's what the new Wg/FinanceWeenie is saying at our grand AMC base.
  14. DTS already does this. Go to Expenses and click Create Expense from GTC Statement or something like that. Thoughts (not GO safe...sanitize!) -- From an AMC standpoint, the most frustrating thing about DTS is the amount of information that has to be put in prior to going TDY and then all that information has to be edited once we have returned. When I am TDY 6-9 times a month and I have to enter (6-9)*2 things into DTS (Auth + Voucher), I get annoyed. Especially when we put "Variations Authorized" in the Auth and then DTS throws a shitfit when we change the itinerary for the Voucher upon our return. Also, the -$16 glitch is super annoying when trying to select OINC for $3.50 a day when directed. Finally, the AF infatuation with 6-9 popups per web application is super fucking annoying. Lose the finance jargon in every step of the process. Most of us don't speak it. My favorite feature is the page that lets me adjust the split disbursement. However, everything good comes with a price, and if I use the feature, I then have to justify 6-9 flags for changing the split disbursement.
  15. Apparently their professional development advice does not include the 3 exclamation point limit per OPR comment block.
  16. Quick! Where's the Weinstein-signal? We've got some distinct religiosity that would offend non-Judeo-Christians!
  17. You got off the runway ok. TOLD checks.
  18. Fixed some of that for you.
  19. It's not new. It was stolen from the Army.
  20. I got my 2012 AF climate survey link today. I'm pretty sure I marked "disagree" or "strongly disagree" for most of the questions like "I think HAF is looking out for me." I have a feeling I'm not the only one.
×
×
  • Create New...