Azimuth Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 (edited) 1 hour ago, Timbonez said: It wasn't taken down because of opsec. The guy who created the video was told to take it down because he didn't ask for permission. He is turning it over to PA so it can be "vetted" first. The people who were on the ISIS hit list had done interviews and stories for PA. All they did was Googlefu their name and what base their from and they eventually found their address. I wouldn't want PA vetting anything. Edited January 28, 2016 by Azimuth 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzz Posted January 28, 2016 Share Posted January 28, 2016 3 hours ago, Lawman said: But if PA doesn't vet and publish the video how can any of them get a bullet for their next evaluation out of somebody else's hard work? If PA produced videos with 1/3 of the quality of this instead of interviewing Col. X or Chief X for some article that nobody will read about resiliency/SAPR/Uniforms/Suicides/Masters/PME/Volunteering/"the mission" (that's not actually the mission) etc. nobody would ever give PA a hard time. But no they'll continue to cover the latest road clean up/bake sale project or write more stupid articles about shit nobody cares about while ignoring the actual things that go on around base to kill bad guys and break their stuff. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stitch Posted January 29, 2016 Share Posted January 29, 2016 On 1/28/2016 at 1:10 AM, Fuzz said: If PA produced videos with 1/3 of the quality of this instead of interviewing Col. X or Chief X for some article that nobody will read about resiliency/SAPR/Uniforms/Suicides/Masters/PME/Volunteering/"the mission" (that's not actually the mission) etc. nobody would ever give PA a hard time. But no they'll continue to cover the latest road clean up/bake sale project or write more stupid articles about shit nobody cares about while ignoring the actual things that go on around base to kill bad guys and break their stuff. Nailed it! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco_Nav963 Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 Just going to put this here... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ThreeHoler Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 Wow. The Syria situation reaches another level of potential US/Soviet escalation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SurelySerious Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 Because we're backfilling one bomber with another? I think the intensity of the proxy war has little to do with that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzz Posted February 27, 2016 Share Posted February 27, 2016 8 hours ago, SurelySerious said: Because we're backfilling one bomber with another? I think the intensity of the proxy war has little to do with that. U.S. Supplied TOW Missile against Russian T-90 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SurelySerious Posted February 28, 2016 Share Posted February 28, 2016 Because we're backfilling one bomber with another? I think the intensity of the proxy war has little to do with that. U.S. Supplied TOW Missile against Russian T-90 RUS making a big deal out of this would be like us throwing a tantrum every time an RPG was fired at our helos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bergman Posted April 9, 2016 Author Share Posted April 9, 2016 B-52s arrive in Qatar 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now