Jump to content

dusty69

Registered User
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by dusty69

  1. The damage from legacy to UPT 2.5 in the T-1 was more in the grading and less in the hours, IMO. The syllabus was shaved a bit, but the bulk of the bell curve could keep up. Those who couldn't keep up, obviously resulted in more 88s 89s. Those failures were retained or pushed to stay, which resulted in a climate of "no matter how hard we grade, leadership will graduate them anyway" which in turn leads to easier grading. You can talk about holding the line, and lots of IPs tried. But at the end of the day leadership isn't sending that message. Only worse now with T-1s gone. The sim syllabus was an absolute joke.
  2. Anyone know if the IPT locations have or will have AD liaison or IP positions?
  3. regardless of AMF-S date the assignments should be worked. without jets, no gate months. The MAJCOMS didnt send ppl to be full time sim instructors
  4. Not sure about Vance or Columbus, but rumor is no more jets at DLF by November.. so ideally pcs'ing the IPs soon after if not going T-6s
  5. Whats the latest heard on AMF-S? Rumors that its getting cut..and aetc decisions supposed to be made this month?
×
×
  • Create New...