Jump to content

pbar

Super User
  • Posts

    292
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by pbar

  1. The Korean press is going to great lengths to pin the blame on Boeing or the airport. Thus far it seems to be a clear cut case of pilot error but that would make Korea look bad, so they can't admit that (especially when the female flight attendants showed them up by doing their jobs better). Guess media anywhere is extremely biased...

    I would suspect that Korean culture has something to do with this ala' the KAL Guam crash of the mid-90s.

  2. Just finished up writing a performance report on a USMC major and I've also written on Navy and Army types as well. Our system is definitely the worse of the four from what I can see.

    On the other hand, I remember a anecdote one of my ROTC professors relayed about the process the AF went through to switch from the OER (Officer Effectiveness Report) to the OPR (really dating myself here). He said they had a team that went and talked to most of the Fortune 500 companies about how they did evals and every company told them, "When you figure it out, come back and tell us." Performance evals will always be a hideously wicked problem to tackle and subject to human frailties. Of course, it'd be nice if the AF didn't screw it up worse than the other services...

  3. Funny how cyclical B-1 manning is in such a short time. Two years I was told a staff wasn't an option and that I had to go back to fly at Dyess/Ellsworth (luckily I had the RAS get out of jail free card and got to PCS to Hawaii). Six months ago another B-1 WSO I know finishing up ACSC was told no flying slot was available for him. I don't envy our assignments guy trying to make the manning work with all the rapid throttle movements...

  4. When I was stationed in Korea, I had a whole computer never arrive but thankfully Newegg sent a replacement. A friend had three stolen before he finally gotten one. Apparently there are ton of thieves at the San Francisco APO...

  5. Never heard of any location in the CONUS being considered a remote. MAYBE, in the back of my cranium might remember an old 102 driver talk about a remote CONUS flying gig in the northern mid-west as part of ADC before transitioning to the F-15A. But that's going back a ways.

    Eldorado AFS (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eldorado_Air_Force_Station) , a Pave Paws radar site, was a bonified CONUS remote assignment. Went on tour of it when I was a 2Lt and the dudes working there told us that they got remote credit.

  6. The secure-VTC statement is seriously ridiculous. Why don't we trust out folks to know when they can or cannot accomplish something via SVTC? Do the bean-counters really think that when I'm already TDY 200+ days per year for training and deployment that I REALLY want to go TDY to yet another meeting? When I say I need to go TDY (by turning in a travel auth) then that means I need to go TDY!!! I shouldn't have to copy/paste in a ridiculous statement saying "No kidding, I really do need to go TDY..."

    Can't believe I'm defending Finance but from what I understand this requirement came from on high, SecDef's office (OSD) or some such. We have to put it in our DTS here in a joint command too.

  7. The AF ought to think about buying some P-8s. Strip off (sts) the ASW gear, hang some JDAMs, etc. on it, put a decent IMINT and SIGINT package in it (sts), and maybe some comm jamming equipment and you'd have a great airplane for the current unpleasantries in Afghanistan, the Philippines, etc.. Could hang out for hours providing the kinds of support needed at a fraction of the cost of B-1s or F-15Es (minus the strafing). Save those airframes for the big fight. Maybe you could have a couple of squadrons in AFSOC... For higher end scenarios maybe they could supplement ISR assets or be JSSAM/MALD trucks.

  8. This reminds me of a funny story that I heard when I was an exchange student at the Korean AF ACSC. After the we came out with our new logo/symbol, the ROKAF decided it was time to update theirs as well. So they hired a civlian PR firm in Seoul to design one and the ROKAF also asked them to come up with a new English motto, telling the PR firm that they liked the old USAF motto "Aim High", so make the new one similar to that. So, for $500K, the PR firm came up with "Always High". Fortunately for the ROKs, the project officer asked the USAF exchange professor we had at their Staff College what he thought of it and he was able to explain the colloquial meaning of "Always High" before they had their 4 star sign off on it.

    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...