Jump to content

pbar

Super User
  • Posts

    292
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Posts posted by pbar

  1. On 8/2/2019 at 9:54 AM, Orbit said:

    PSA: about PSA, palmetto state armory, they have a good deal on complete ar-15 lowers right now with magpul hardware. 

    Be careful.  Just bought one and the pistol grip didn't come with the screw to hold it to the lower. 

  2. On 6/26/2019 at 8:24 AM, pawnman said:

    Folks love the idea of enlisted and WO pilots, as if we'll find people smart enough to fly airplanes but too dumb to figure out the airlines pay better.

    They found people like us dumb enough to be CSOs/WSOs...

  3. On 7/24/2019 at 5:49 PM, pawnman said:

    Had lunch with the deputy OG today... Turns out Dyess has not promoted a WSO in the last four years.  Fun times.

    Weird.  In my year group in the Bone, we got 9-10 IDE in-res slots and out of those, 8 were WSOs (myself included, though how I got one is beyond me).  Once again, timing is EVERYTHING.

  4. 4 hours ago, pawnman said:

    I do wonder what the rate is for APZ, with a P, but with a filled out PRF vs guys who have given up writing them at 3+ APZ.

    I know a B-1 WSO who made O-5 like 4 or 5 APZ.  I know 2-3 B-1 pilots who made it 1 APZ too.  I also know a B-1 WSO who made O-4 7 APZ.

    • Upvote 1
  5. On 5/15/2019 at 10:57 PM, pawnman said:

    My experience is the opposite.  People who stay in the community and become experts in the B-1 usually don't do as well as people who do literally anything else - UPT, ALO, staff, etc.

    That must of have changed. When I was in the B-1 community (left in 2004), people who left, like me, didn't do as well as though who stayed. I left and wasn't able to get a squadron command and so got passed over for O-6. 

  6. 14 hours ago, Jetpilot said:

    A pointless measure.  All this does is validate what we already know.  PRF's are an inaccurate means of identifying real leadership potential.  This measure simply promotes the self-licking ice cream cone that is our USAF promotion system.  You can literally do F*@#& all for 12 years, take an exec/aide gig working for a general and end up on top of the pack.  

     

    Side note:  Word on the street said mock boards that were conducted using an officer's record without a PRF yielded drastically different results than mock boards conducted using 2 line/9 line PRFs respectively.  Hmmm...      

    While the process doesn't have to be as imperfect as the AF does it, it's not an easy process. One of my AFROTC instructors was a personnel type who was involved in creating the PRF and later changing from the OER to the OPR.  He said they talked to all the Fortune 500 companies at the time to ask how they did performance eval and promotions.  They answer they got back from all of them was basically, "If you figure it out, come back and let us know."  

    • Upvote 1
  7. The Pentagon doesn't lack for money; what it lacks is the ability to prioritize between the must-have and the nice-to-have, which is in turn, exacerbated by Congressional meddling/vote-buying.  People are so emotionally wrapped up in the nice-to-haves (which is why I won't give any specifics here) that we can't even have the discussion. 

  8. When I did a short stint as a security clearance background investigator post-retirement (before finding a real job), I don't recall having to ask anything about investments when I would "investigate" for TS clearances except for foreign financial interests.  

  9. Past indifference to the environment is going to haunt the AF (and the rest of the services) for decades.  When I was getting my environmental masters, I did a project with base CE at Dyess.  One of the folks I worked with told me how Dyess had a railroad tank car buried up to the tower for decades until the early '90s that the base used to dispose of motor oil, waste chemicals, etc.  "It was great because it never filled up."

    • Upvote 1
  10. 15 hours ago, Lawman said:

    Yeah looking at this if we’re thinking “are we taking an unnecessary risk” I think the smart Lowest cost highest payoff universal move is building on site protection. 

    HAS, Purpose built hangers, whatever... I think this might make a military that has 20 silver bullets parked in Missouri that cannot be replaced go “hey maybe I can spend some cash on a better garage for my stuff.”

     

    for the cost of 1 B-2 or 2-3 Raptors..... what could you build...

    When I was stationed at Camp Smith I remember someone telling me that PACAF looked at building HASes for the E-3s at Kadena but each HAS would cost $1 billion...

  11. 11 hours ago, Lawman said:

     Same could be said with Dyess.

     

    Then again if Rainer ever blows it’s top, half the ground combat power in PACOM goes with it. Along with like 1/3 of the population of Washington.

     

     

     

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

     

     

    The 1991 tornado at McConnell AFB, KS apparently just missed a flightline full of B-1s when it went through.  I shudder to think of a F-5 tornado hitting Whiteman or one of the major depots (Hill, Robins, Tinker).  

  12. A bigger issue is the fact that we are wasting airframe life on the B-1(and B-52s/F-15Es, etc.) doing CAS in Afghanistan when the AF should have bought the Tucano/AT-6 a decade ago to use instead.  Or if you just want a coordinate bomber with long on-station times, we could have hung JDAMs on a 737 (i.e. Navy P-8) a decade ago.  

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 4
  13. 4 hours ago, Lord Ratner said:

    If the only outcome is that bump fire stocks are outlawed, the NRA will be lucky. And they should have been illegal already.

    I'm a big fan of the 2nd. Bigly in favor of it. But you can't answer this massacre with "that's the price of freedom."

    Gun owners need to be ready to justify all the toys we have access to. At the moment I'm having a difficult time thinking of a justification for removable magazines.

    Agreed but unfortunately compromise isn't possible with the gun control Left.  We could trade away bump fire stocks and trigger cranks as part of a compromise but that would just whet their appetite for more gun control, leading to their desired end game-total abolition of private firearm ownership.  Like a Terminator, they will not stop until they reach that endstate.  

    The sad fact is that elimination of most firearms would be fairly easy to accomplish.  Once they have ownership lists, either by mandatory registration, credit card data mining, having doctors ask kids if their parents have guns, etc. then they can require you to turn them in.  They don't need to send police or military to round them up.  All they need to do is make turning them in a condition of any interaction with the government such as renewing your driver's license or license plates, getting a tax return, applying for unemployment, etc. 

  14. 12 hours ago, brabus said:

    It's already part of the ARC. Though there is not an entire ARC squadron with their own jets (at least I think the 38s are AD iron), but plenty of ARC guys work in an AD squadron.  I agree though, it's a mission that could work well in the ARC, especially for guys who are older, still want to fly something fast, but don't have the desire to keep up with all the requirements demanded by an F-X. Great for a part timer especially. 

    Two of three Navy Aggressor squadrons are Reserve squadrons IIRC.

  15. Closed with Travis Smith at National Bank of Kansas City for our second house/loan with them.  As always, expeditious and the rate they gave us was .5% below USAA.  Also, my real estate agent was surprised by how quickly NBKC was able to get everything done.  As mentioned, this is the second loan we got through Travis and he was great to work with!

  16. Doesn't seem like prices have fallen all that much however.  However, I have noticed whereas I paid around $2000 for a Keltec RFB in 2013, they are going for about $1200 now.  Doesn't seem like the top tier stuff has gone down in price at all though.  

×
×
  • Create New...