BFM this
-
Posts
1,223 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
31
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Downloads
Wiki
Posts posted by BFM this
-
-
I was really young during 40%. I remember a lot of bitterness. A LOT. In conjuntion, a lot of E-6's were getting kicked to the curb at 16-17 years.
I was like a young pup that could smell something bad in the air, but didn't quite know what it was...
-
-
Secondly, is there a demand for an adapter that would connect your ACCES earplugs to a standart 3.5mm stereo jack?
All great thoughts, but I wanted to point something out. When my unit transitioned to ACCES we had a very smart LSO working at the group. He rightly predicted that the user would have to get accostomed to these new earpieces. Second, since Westone already had our molds, it was very little additional cost to order everybody stereo earphones specifically to ease the acclimation process. And yes, they legitimately helped.
If your unit is about to transition to ACCES, I would drop this idea off with your LSO. The earphones are pretty awesome--could be better with lower freq's, so if you're a full-up audiophile you prob won't be impressed, but I like them.
If your unit has already tx'd, you're not out of luck. Westone keeps all molds for 5 years; call them up--it's prob way cheaper to get a set of headphones with a ready mold. I haven't looked into it yet, but even if mine don't wear out/break/get lost I'm planning on ordering another set in 3-4 years. They are hands-down the best fitting earphones I've ever had.
Sorry for the hijack--Back to the discussion.
-
That dude made O6. And got a Wing.
...
-
Copy, you've never flown a heavy. Noted.
Neither have you. Noted.
-
5
-
-
It's ok. They had radar SA.
-
First off, this is an ACSC paper. C'mon, how often do those get any traction?
Second, agree with Brother Brabus-Johnson: you'll get your AR intro in the B-course (MQT often enough). You won't remember what the big deal was two weeks into your first deployment. Two months into said deployment, you'll stay on the boom while using a piddle-pack.
In the last month of the deployment, you'll see which booms catch that you're giving the ops desk dsn every time they ask for your tail number.
-
1
-
-
Has anyone attempted to get the Education Office to pay for your ATP test/flight via the 1-time $4500 certification? There is some verbiage about $250/credit hour, and that doesn't directly translate to an FAA certificate program. The Ed Office explained to me that if I can show where the school is accredited, they would pay for the cert. I explained that the AllATP course is only 3 days long, and she said in non-standard courses, they'll pay $250 for every 15 hours of instruction.
So in the case of the 3-day course at AllATP, the AF would pay up to $750 of the total $2500 bill (and a $300 evaluator charge on top of that)... but they'll pay nothing unless I can prove the school's accreditation.
Anyone already fought/won this battle?
If you need to reference an education office that is up and running with this, call Moody. They've got two schools approved. I didn't use them for my ATP due to scheduling complications, but they know the regs and certification requirements.
-
How long had he been gone?
Was this a result of the "return to fly board"?
-
Here is a rant from a retired fighter pilot that is worth reading:
Word.
-
I wanted to throw up during the graduation ceremony,
DUDE, I know exactly what you mean...
Wait, what?
-
Austria spent a mint on their fifteen aircraft delivered in 2007, for which they currently have fourteen pilots that average about six flying hours a month - with five aircraft expected to be operational at any one time. Sort of like your local flying club.
On the other hand, this should give the new Austrian fighter fleet an expected airframe life of about 200 years.
Sounds like they're just copying from ACC's RTM drafts for next year.
-
1
-
-
At the risk of starting this argument again, the use of the word "operator" implies that they are in more than a support role. The headline was purposely misleading.
Valid. Whoever wrote the article throws around the word "operator" like everyone else uses warrior. I just would have been more incensed if the article had implied a full title or glossed over training and qualification differences.
-
I love how they continue to twist the truth to make it seem like women perform at the same level as the guys who actually kick the doors down. These women are merely in a support role just like any other soldier/airman/sailor that is attached to a SOF unit in a support capacity.
oh I don't know, I think they were pretty up front about this being an augmentee thing, not the full up real deal. True, the headline was misleading though.
The Soldiers assigned to the Cultural Support Teams aren't required to endure all the training of a Ranger or SF trooper, but they do have to learn advanced weapons handling and even fast-roping. Through three separate nine-day assessments so far, the Special Warfare Center and School has about a 50 percent attrition rate, officials say. Those who make it go through a six-week training course that teaches the Soldiers regional culture, intelligence gathering and small-unit combat tactics, officials say. -
Tired of reading the word "crash" associated with this mishap, too...
No joke; for a plane that size, that's prob the best off-field landing I've ever seen.
-
One of my motorcycle riding troops got told at the gate today here in sunny Cannon, that the extra reflective belt around his back-back no longer cut the mustard. The "new" requirement is that the horrible dark spot covering your back will now warrant it's own entire and full up reflective VEST.
Someone just got a OPR bullet for improving the safety of the Motorcycle Safety Program.
Standard @ Moody for the last 3 years. Retarded to say the least. I just don't go to the gym on days that I ride.
The appearance of safety is all that matters.
-
Makes perfect sense.
Wait, you don't think it will actually happen that way, do you?
-
I've got quite a bit into T. Rowe Price and am generally happy with thier management and returns. I've also looked at Vanguard and they look good as well.
Here's a question for the masses:
So I've got my portfolio split between an advisor and my own vehicles (like TRP). None of the stuff that I choose has any loads. I invest, let it grow, and every year move funds from regular to IRA accounts. Annually I see custodial fees drawn from my IRAs, and there is the expenses that is contained with the regular account perspectus' (typically btw .8 and 1.2%), but otherwise, not a load in sight.
Contrast that with my advisor:
Seems that with every event, a monthly automatic investment, moving funds, etc.; it's an auto 5 to 6%. Now my advisor tells me "you always have a load, no matter where you invest." Hmm. A little internet research tells me that her company is probably getting most of this load toward them in commissions.
Am I being fleeced?
-
I've seen guys do excel spreadsheets calculating, to the dollar, exactly what their retirement is worth and comparing it to what they could earn in the private sector and making big decisions based primarily on that. Sad.
You don't really think the gov't side of the table has some higher altruistic motive at heart? It's the same motivator that keeps teachers in the classroom with sub-poverty level pay (although requiring some graduate education to qualify at even the entry level).
A sense of Service will be the motivator for those who lead us through the next 10 years. The politicians are banking on it.
-
1
-
-
I'd be interested to see what our retirement costs the gov't per retiree and again per member.
For the retiree, sure, you've got your flag officers, and you've got some retirees that live to be 100+. But for survivor benefits there is a signifigant contribution from the member; a sort of insurance premium.
Per member, I think the gov't is doing quite well for itself given the percentage of those who get out before 20, and members that pass with only a few retirement years without survivor benefits.
I for one would be happy to trade in our FERS system for the pension. Unfortunately when the math is done, I think we're going to get a significantly watered down result when the benefits are spread over all members, not just the 20+ crowd.
Nearly every "adjustment" in benefits I've seen in my lifetime: Champus-->TRICARE, Final Pay-->High-3-->Choice/REDUX, (notable exception: MGIB-->P911GIB), has been [gov't savings driven]-->[member net benefit reduction].
Right thing to do? Maybe. We can all passionately argue why these are deserved benefits. But has the quality of our force survived previous reductions? I think so. It will again if this latest idea gains traction.
-
1
-
-
It's not an "old" standard, it's a current policy, just one that is ignored by virtually everyone. I'll have to dig up the letter. It basically says exactly what you just wrote, if you are a new guy, you will not have any duties except flying for the first 6 months or so. I think that is something I may start to bring up again...it's a fantastic policy.
Yep--it's written in our vol 1, a year actually.. And ignored wholesale starting the day you finish mqt.
-
Yeah, the tricky part is if I'm in the position where I have to show the letter, then why is there one in the breech?... Dicey at best.
OR
Or, base/cc's could man up and start allowing ccw on base. Crazy I know. I'd even be game for some caveats:
-a confidential program (don't talk about fight club)
-SNCO's and above legally ccw certified by the state (cc nominated)
-zero drinking wg/cc policy when carrying
But at the end of the day, it would take a human wave of aq rushing the gate before a base/cc allows anyone other than sp's carry on base. Really sad. That's all I've got: I have to go get my pt test monitored by some fat civ.
ETA: really I'm going to not take your advice lest the next reply quote the oath, constitution, core values, reflective belt AFI, club membership, etc...
-
I made it one minute. That's it.
-
No worries; NV is a shall issue state...
oh, wait, gotta go thru the gate and on base...never mind
Bitches better bring their 4WD if that's my only option.
Military retirement under attack
in General Discussion
Posted
Fast forward a few years. Assuming these changes take place, how or would your advice change for...
the 17yo that is thinking of enlisting
17yo thinking about a service academy
junior at the zoo thinking about pilot training
7yr SSgt weighing thier options (ranging from defense contracting job to going back home to be a cop)
I've got my ideas, just thinking through the second order effects for discussion sake.