Jump to content

Hacker

Supreme User
  • Posts

    2,042
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    90

Posts posted by Hacker

  1. 4 hours ago, WheelsOff said:

    A dude who currently flies for them who knows a guy that currently has his app in...lots of 38 time in addition to an assignment or two in a fighter.

    There are other folks who currently fly for them, ahem, and haven't heard such a rumor.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
  2. 25 minutes ago, WheelsOff said:

    Also heard rumors that Purple specifically may be “discounting” T-38C time and treating it more like they do T-6 time...even though it’s multi engine, >12.5k GW? Someone please tell me I’m wrong?

    What's the source of this rumor?

  3. Hoping someone knows some history of the USAF PJ community and might be able to help shed some light.

    I met someone at a party who says he was an officer PJ, essentially, back in the late 80s and early 90s.  The time/location/atmosphere of the discussion didn't really allow me to pin down much in the way of specifics; he said he had been a USAF doc attached to JSOC at Ft Bragg, and had done the same training that the PJs did in terms of Airborne school and some Navy diving school, but he was quite clear in saying, "I wasn't actually a PJ, though."  He described being part of a couple of SOF-type adventures abroad, pretty entertaining but seemingly humble storyteller. He sure seemed to speak the language of actual former USAF and didn't peg my poser-meter when we started riffing on Big-Blue specific stuff.

    Afterward, though, I just wondered how someone could go from standard 1-each military doctor to being the equivalent of a modern-day CRO.  I don't know anything about how JSOC and USAF Rescue work, I'm just curious if anyone knows about USAF officers, doctors, being attached to JSOC and doing PJ-type stuff back in the day.

  4. 1 hour ago, icohftb said:

    Whats so special/challenging about flying an AC130 vs a regular 130, U28 or a fighter for that matter?

    No trying to be a smartass but seriously curious why you'd think they require a boarded process.

    Mission employment, and the relative difficulty of it, is the answer you are looking for.

  5. 3 hours ago, dream big said:

    “The composition of flight squadrons needs to reflect the entire U.S. population, he said. Squadrons today, particularly fighter squadrons, are still mostly composed of white males, something that must change to reflect the country's demographics, he added.”

    ....Yepp, this is why pilots are leaving the Air Force, too many white males!! YGBFSM

     

    They really are this stupid.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 8
  6. 4 minutes ago, hindsight2020 said:

    Maybe. But a dismissal is a felony equivalent in civilian employment circles. So even for regionals it's probably a stretch; the regionals have plenty of low time applicants with clean criminal records.

    I think you're seriously underestimating the magnitude of the staffing crisis at the regionals.  "Plenty" is not an accurate term.

    I know of a guy who went to jail for manslaughter....drove his 2-seater Porsche with two women crowded in the passenger seat while drunk, and the drive ended in a fiery crash that killed one of them...and who was hired at the regionals (by more than one airline, actually).

    So...I am certain our disgraced IP he could find a regional that would hire him with a little looking.

  7. 12 hours ago, HuggyU2 said:

    Hacker, 

    Knowing you, you had a camera lined up on the mid-air, and have magazine-ready photos to prove it.  

    Great to see you!!  But 3 minutes in passing on the ramp isn't enough to catch up, Amigo.  

    ICAS is only 76 days... hope to see you at our "event".   

    I was actually over on the east side of the course at Pylon 2, so I didn't see it (fortunately?  unfortunately?). I heard the mayday on the race control freq, and watched the second jet do a battle damage check with the pace plane through my camera.

    The best part was talking to Marilyn Dash, who was doing the commentating on the NBC Sports and internet live feed, after the incident.  She is known to be quite "colorful" with her language, and she told me, "I've never come so close to yelling 'OH SHIT!!' to an audience of untold thousands as when I saw that midair."  I think that would have been epic, personally...but probably not good for the commentating career.

    Looked like you were having fun with the Patriots, tho.  And, yes, of course I will hoist a brew with you at ICAS -- wouldn't miss it!

  8. 54 minutes ago, Guardian said:

    Who’s at fault? I don’t know racing rules?

    The aircraft doing the passing has to keep the aircraft in front of him in sight, and pass to the outside and no lower than the lead airplane's altitude.

  9. 4 hours ago, badgerPilot said:

    For those that transcribed into an electronic format...

    Did you bring the "originals" ie old paper, and AF flight records to the A-line interview?

    They would seem to be needed due to the ink endorsements, but not sure if anyone cares.

    I did, but it was probably overkill -- based on the questions they asked, they didn't look beyond the summary page of my printed-out digital log.

    • Upvote 1
  10. 1 hour ago, uhhello said:

    Yeah, complete head scratcher.  The weekend trip to Syria with a bag of cash was icing on the cake. 

    Personally, I'm looking forward to the storyline next season of him getting his clearance revoked, and his Article 15 with General Discharge, or maybe an FEB.

    An acceptable alternative would be the story of him getting kidnapped by ISIS and starring in his own special internet murder video.

  11. 1 hour ago, Newb said:

    Are B-1 hours weighed differently compared to other heavy airframes? I’m only flying about 100-150 hours a year and at this rate, I will only have about 2000 total hours at the end of my ADSC, when most heavy pilots have about 3000.

    Don't worry about that, it won't likely be an issue.

  12. 1 hour ago, Clark Griswold said:

    No disagreement that the long nose is a forward visibility problem and better engine placement would be better but some long nosed aircraft have had good records in the Attack mission set, ref the F4U Corsair in Korea and Westland Wyvern in the Suez Crisis used by the Royal Navy (cockpit seems raised and the nose tapered for vis, that could mitigate some forward vis  problems).  Point taken though that more have a shorter nose than a schnoze

    If you look at what kinds of ordnance they were shooting (a lot of forward-firing stuff like rockets) and what kind of deliveries they were doing (high angle dive bombs, which have substantially less sight depression from the flight path than the 10s, 20s, and 30s that jets routinely do), then it makes sense why the long nose wasn't a problem then but it would be now.

    Regarding the location of the exhaust, the Enforcer engineering team did a lot of testing about the design, location, and placement of that stack, and left side vs right side, how far forward, how far back, etc, and the way it is on the PA-48 was the best of the three designs (between the Turbo Mustang, the PE-1/2 Enforcer, and the PA-48 Enforcer).  A lot was initially learned about it from the YAT-28E program which used the same engine and gearbox setup, but was apparently a huge IR target.

    When they flew the PA-48 Enforcer against the threat laydown at Tolicha Peak and Pahute Mesa up on the Nellis range, it did very well in terms of avoiding detection and tracking...so ops check good. 

    I don't have it in front of me, but the "production" Enforcer design (which was going to have the shorter nose and stacked cockpit look like the A-29) had some changes to the design and location of the stack, but it was still basically there at the left wing root.

    YAT-28E:

    09B.jpg

    PA-48:

    1550533-large.jpg

  13. 9 hours ago, Clark Griswold said:

    If we're gonna dream about resurrecting old iron with new bells and whistles... it's a repeat post but this modeler guy had it just about right (would have made it a two seater, you need one for the COIN/LIC mission)...

    trr2.jpg

    trr3.jpg

    Methinks the exhaust should've been routed to the tail but whatever, it's vaporware...

    The purpose of the exhaust location here, just like on the Piper Enforcer, is to hide it from any low-aspect IR-SAM or MANPAD with the wing.

    There is also a secondary "blown wing" effect by putting the exhaust over the top and increasing lift.

    On a different subject, the reason this thing is a non-starter is that long-assed nose.  It is the same problem the Piper Enforcer had, lookdown angle needed for dropping gravity ordnance.

    Most fighters have a lookdown angle of about 15 degrees...and this pig doesn't.  The PA-48 Enforcer had a lookdown over the nose of about 5 degrees.  So, you can't see the target through a HUD at the moment of pickle.  Kind of a bummer for a dedicated ground attack airplane.

    That's one of the main reasons the PA-48 was a bust in the 70s and 80s (it was tested out by the AF twice, and rejected twice).

    And it is the big reason for the short nose and jacked-up cockpit angle on the A-29.

    • Like 1
    • Upvote 1
×
×
  • Create New...