-
Posts
734 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
8
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Downloads
Wiki
Posts posted by LookieRookie
-
-
1 hour ago, brabus said:
With "standard locality" I'd have to be a step 9 to break even with Maj AGR, even with the 25% bonus. You must be figuring in a hell of a locality pay (which I'm not saying isn't possible, but by definition location dependent). And that doesn't include all the ridiculous asspain that goes along with being a technician that doesn't exist as an AGR. So I'd say you need to be a step 10 to start getting ahead of a Maj AGR...how many O-4s on here who are 13 step 10s? Bottom line, moving to AGR is the right move...the better move is laughing your way to your next fill-in-the-blank airline trip.
With the new SSR pilots get 25%(or whatever the multiplier is) + locality and then the 25% bonus is separate.
So the people who were in high locality areas aren't being shafted anymore.
-
29 minutes ago, donkey said:
That's crazy. I wonder what the CVR has on it.
Malfunction or suicide.
FLCS malf pushed them to 49 NL and they only cut 29 degrees before impact.
OR
Max power dive into the ground with the other pilot pulling the yolk back to 20 NL prior to impact.
-
It's official. The USAF requested 8 F-15EXs.
-
KC-46 selection board v3.0 results were released. Best part was the comment about selectees should feel free to apply to other assignments.
- 1
-
Is SewerRat one of the new AIs that make posts to sound human or is he really semi-literate? The world may never know.
- 1
- 1
-
That's a lot of words from the Chief and talking to SNC and Textron about how he "cannot thank the two companies that joined us enough for their partnership."
Meanwhile, other sources are saying industry may not trust Big Blue on future partnerships unless there's money upfront.
-
Put that location and desire in talent marketplace. Let your commander know in a year or so and he can keep trying to extend you.
Are you in a Gucci location? If so, it's going to be unlikely.
Volunteer for a 365 before you get orders and then ask for a follow-on back to the same location.
-
10 hours ago, stract said:
what defines a "certified" sim? Certified in the eyes of the FAA? Level D only? ? ? ? In my MDS, our sims were not Level D, not certified by the FAA, even though two of the three have motion.
I'd assume if it has a 781 and is logged into ARMS it counts.
-
PWC 1 pilots in the T-38C and T-6A are still legal to shoot the (100-¼) PAR into NAS Corpus.
Good luck explaining why you went there though if TOP 3 finds out.
-
10 hours ago, HuggyU2 said:
Back in the 80's, I'm not so sure. As a 2Lt FAIP in 1987, I recall shooting T-38A PAR approaches in to Corpus when it was 100' and 3/4 one day. Legally.
The real question is: did you break out and land or have to go missed?
-
3 hours ago, Tank said:
So then the 81 FS got a new customer?
-
13 hours ago, Guardian said:
Again I ask, according to who? Article doesn’t definitively say that it wasn’t a pilot or numbered angel.
“but the removed person does not appear to be a “numbered” pilot.”
Doesn’t appear isn’t confirmation.Edited because I read it wrong.
-
3 minutes ago, dream big said:
That PR stunt is what is wrong with the Air Force and society. If women are equal to and as capable as men, then why does this warrant celebration?
It's important to have role models. A young girl can see it's possible to be an Air Force pilot when she thinks it's a male only career field.
- 5
-
12 minutes ago, Guardian said:
Says who? That article doesn’t say who it was or wasn’t definitively.It wasn't a flyer because it's not a numbered member. If it's like the tbirds all the support officers have a number too. That would mean enlisted
-
14 hours ago, Magnum said:
Go on...
A member on the Blue Angels was suspended.
https://www.navytimes.com/news/your-navy/2019/02/13/navy-confirms-mysterious-blue-angel-suspension/
-
I took the argument more of, the T-X is going to be very easy to fly and we'll cut over half the T-38 syllabus when it transitions to the T-X because you don't have to worry about stubby wings, underpowered compressor stalling engines, and a shitty turn radius.
Therefore, it makes more sense to give the T-X to Fighter Training Squadrons to have wingman learn how to employ it as a weapon right after an IQ check.
-
New Words: Could be turboprop, turbojet, rotary, unmanned, system of systems
Cliffs: We don't really want it.
-
Seems like the AETC/CC wants another star.
- 1
-
55 minutes ago, brabus said:
"There was an "incredible convergence of stimuli," Col. Thomas Sherman, commander of the 88th Air Base Wing, told reporters Wednesday. "Sounds, yells, sights. All of those things that are really testing the senses."
Hahaha, oh wait, you're serious? This is one, rare time where I think some leadership deserves to get fired. Unbelievable clown show.
Strange too since he's a career cop. I'd assume he's trying to provide a scapegoat to mitigate the fallout.
-
On 12/14/2018 at 8:18 PM, Type3gunonly said:
Thanks. I was one of the last guys to fly the mighty T34C before it was sundowned, I know that's a rather specific question but do you think there would be any heartache not having flown a T6?
Nope. Same Same as long as you did primary fixed wing. Caveat, I'm not the 19 AF/DOU so they would have final say.
-
1 hour ago, Type3gunonly said:
Thanks dude, I figured as much re: pointy nose, but it's good to know that pipeline is an option. Appreciate the response!
If you flew T-6s you'd do the T-38 T-X course then IFF at Randolph before b course.
- 1
-
6 minutes ago, ThreeHoler said:
I have no idea how you made it this far...or you’re still trolling.
MLR.Pile on since he probably doesnt know: aggregate DPs and checking wings to see if they are speeding
-
22 minutes ago, di1630 said:
I’m gonna guess it’s a U-2 just because I’m not sure what else it could be that lands tough.
Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile appU-2s wouldn't gain a newly winged pilot that just washed out of IFF. Odds are he was in E-3/E-8/RC-135 or a U-28
-
1 hour ago, Majestik Møøse said:
War machines. I wonder how today’s perfect-on-paper Air Force leadership would handle those kinds of losses.
The service in general could not handle it because airframes are no longer replaceable
- 2
Palace Chase info
in Air National Guard / Air Force Reserves
Posted
Are you an out of hide billet? If so, maybe check with your sq/cc billet owner.