Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 12/02/2010 in all areas

  1. OK, mr player, if you feel a bunch of our military don't deserve a retirement because they don't work as hard as you, or their job isn't as dangerous as yours, or you feel their job is insignificant to military operations, fine. Lets fix it this way. 1. If their job is so simple and doesn't warrant a 20-year military retirement, then convert it to a GS-6/7/8/9. The shit gets done, there's continuity, you don't have to keep training a bunch of newbies, and you could probably cut a few positions. 2. If the job requires someone to deploy every once in a while, keep just enough military such that their ops tempo is the same as everyone elses. Thus they can have a retirement because they are now working as hard as you. Now for you congresspeople. You want to cut military retirement, cut yours too. I say lead by example. Start with no retirement unless you serve 20 years. OUT
    1 point
  2. Yeah, that would really kill retention...I know it would make me think twice...365 remote...bite me! Why don't they kill some of the freaking social welfare programs. Son of a bitch dead beats with their hands out, not working for an honest pay check a day in their pathetic lives. I was once on food stamps, embarrassing as hell and I only did it for the absolute shortest length of time. That is the way the programs were designed. They weren't intended to benefit you for the rest of your damned life. I do realize that there are plenty of cases where people need welfare for the long haul, but McDonald's, Burger King, and KFC are almost ALWAYS hiring.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...