jorfy
Registered User
-
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by jorfy
-
KEND 26-01AF F-16 Holloman F-15E SJ F-35 Luke x2 (1 AD, 1 Reserve) T-38 FAIP T-6 FAIP
-
-
KEND 25-14AU T-38 x7 T-6 FAIP KC-135 Grissom KC-135 KS Guard x2 KC-135 Altus x3 RC-135 Offutt KC-46 Altus x4 C-17 Dover Reserve C-17 Altus x5 C-21 Scott C-130J Little Rock OA-1K Will Rogers
-
KEND 25-13AU: T-38 x7 RC-135 Offutt KC-135 Grissom KC-135 Pittsburgh KC-135 Altus x3 C-17 Altus x4 T-6 FAIP OA-1K Will Rogers C-5 Lackland C-130J Little Rock C-21 Scott C-17 MS Guard
-
Dude did not look very happy! Especially going after the guy who dropped a Raptor!
-
KEND 25-12AF (T-38) F-15E SJ F-22 Langley Eurofighter Germany KC-135 McConnell T-38 FAIP
-
Vance 25-11 AM/AF (T-1/T-38) T-1 XPW: C-17 JBER x2 KC-46 Pease ANGB KC-135 Eielson HC-130J Gabreski ANGB KC-46 McConnell C-130J Ft Worth C-5 Travis C-130H Reno C-130H Rosecrans ANGB C-17 Pittsburgh ARS T-38: T-38 FAIP x2 F-35 Jacksonville Guard F-16 Holloman C-130J Yokota
-
All the drops are out of the T-6. The 5 T-38s are Phase 3 T-38Cs. Heavies are now T-6 direct to FTU with no more T-1.
-
-
with T-6 direct FTU now for heavies their track select is integrated into their drop night I imagine the -38 folks will get another drop night for their actual airframes
-
Vance 25-10 T-38 x5 T-6 FAIP x1 RC-135 x1 C-17 x4 KC-135 x1 Guard KC-135 x1 Reserve KC-135 x1 C-130J x3 Guard C-130J x2 C-146 x1 KC-46 x1 MC-130J x2
-
-
-
Does anyone know if the writer of the recommendation letter matters as much as the content? I got a buddy who is applying this year and said he wants to get the O-5 Sq/CC to write him a letter vs the O-6 Wg/CC who he had write a letter last year where he didn't get selected for pilot. Buddy works closely with Sq/CC so the letter would be more personal than the O-6. Wanted to give him some advice but not sure if an O-5 letter would have enough weight especially when other applicants are getting O-6 and above letters for their packages.
-
-
Do you have a source for this? I'm just curious as to how they are picking which classes to send people to cause the spread of June/July starters and Oct/Nov starters just in this thread doesn't really make sense to me, especially since they said they would be prioritizing people who are closer to the age limit
-
-
-
Just got a training RIP for IFT (not IPT), which is funny cause I already have my PPL. Anyone else get the same thing? I'm assuming that means that I'll be going through the legacy T-6 syllabus at Vance or Laughlin though, which I'm happy about! Yeah I see my MFS date populated in my CDB so I was hoping I could see my UPT class date somewhere easily accessible as well without having to wait the 2 business days or whatever it is for my SURF to update.
-
-
-
Since Columbus is already doing IPT would switching Laughlin and Vance over to the new IPT syllabus require that much overhead? I'm not sure how backed up or not IPT currently is but I wonder if they will add new locations for IPT to absorb the load a bit. I personally put Vance as my #1 UPT base and I'm hoping I get Vance and a class start date before they switch over cause I really would rather do the legacy T-6 syllabus vs the new IPT syllabus.
-
-
-
