ViperMan
-
Posts
638 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
6
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Gallery
Blogs
Downloads
Wiki
Posts posted by ViperMan
-
-
On 12/4/2023 at 12:49 PM, dream big said:
It’s an Air Force run by nonners for nonners.
It's hard to write a statement as short as this but which contains as much truth as it does...
-
2
-
-
9 hours ago, TreeA10 said:
The level of woke stupidity knows no bounds. My son is an engineer for Texas Instruments. He does validations on chips produced and then writes spec sheets and user manuals for TI customers to use. After he writes these things, various departments review them for accuracy, etc. and make comments. So, he fires off his latest documents and the HR department makes the comment "can not use the term "disable" as it is not inclusive."
In other woke news, the Daily Wire is releasing "Lady Ballers" tomorrow.
I saw a side-by-side of Dylan Mulvaney's first day as a chick alongside this movie's spoof of that day...let's just say it's tough to tell which one is satire and/or intentionally degrading.
-
1 hour ago, slc said:
I thought BLACKFACE was considered "offensive" and should not be used in normal diatribe.....oh wait oops
Blackface is. BLACKRED face is something new. We're not sure if it's offensive yet. We'll have to wait for the left to tell us.
-
2
-
-
1 hour ago, ClearedHot said:
Some partisan race-baiter who poses as a journalist at Deadspin (whatever that is) concocts a story about some kid wearing blackface at a Chief's game and tries to shame the kid on social media. Epic Fail...turns out the kid is wearing Chief's colors and the headdress? Also, turns out the kid is bona fide and registered Native American.
Many Chiefs fans are planning to wear black and red face paint to the next game in a show of support for this kid, who has been getting attacked by the woke left.
UFB...err, wait...I meant totally believable. Par for the left.
-
1
-
-
On 11/28/2023 at 12:59 AM, ClearedHot said:
Completely agree. Also think a well organized group of federal law enforcement officers would have ended that situation very quickly.
It also would have made for absolutely fantastic YouTube clips - like, on the order of the Kyle Rittenhouse show.
-
1 hour ago, ClearedHot said:
The federal government certainly has a responsibility to protect the citizens and federal property but even hinting at employing the military is 3rd world banana republic type stuff. If they didn't have enough Marshalls, FBI, ATF and other federal officers perhaps they could use the Guard under Title 32 but even hinting at the active duty military is complete an utter non-sense.
Not disagreeing with you, but in fairness, CHOP/CHAZ and what it represented - i.e. a government in name only / chaos - is third-world-type shit too...
-
2
-
-
4 hours ago, Lord Ratner said:
They were not promoted in the field due to battle competence.
Especially that one.
-
7 hours ago, Biff_T said:
Most Non Flying AF SNCOs are turds (I will never spell it with an u, those are for pussies lol), prove me wrong.
Well, you do put the 'u' in 'turd' - no one can argue that...
-
3 hours ago, skibum said:
Yeah, but it's modified so you can turn the heat off fro the back seat.
"Turn the GD temperature DOWN!!! Jesus Christ." --- "What?"
-
I hope they do the second one.
-
12 hours ago, Negatory said:
Oh, a brain dead take on political issues on base ops. Who would have guessed.
You saying this unironically is peak you.
Overturning Roe was a good thing, though it may have bought some R losses for a while, it was a shitty legal fiction that needed to go, and it's after-effects will subside in time. You are right about one thing, though, most Americans agree that there should be some restrictions on abortion. You construing this as being anti-republican, however, is confusing. If most people are ok with some abortion but not unrestricted, then why is it still such an issue for the left? I'm not sure your characterization that the left doesn't want abortion on demand is actually true. Most on the left use such notions as "life of the mother", rape, incest, etc (i.e. some other extreme justification) to serve as the justification when the know good and well that it's really about getting it approved because they consider it a family planning tool - which is the justification you quoted in your post. So sure, there's some elections to be lost for a while. I'm fine with that. This is merely the first step in getting back to a rational basis for abortion. The next step is defining the issue more clearly so it rules out the real crime, which is abortion "because I want one."
The "life of the mother" trope is precisely that: a trope. It was never illegal in this country for a woman to get an abortion if her life was in danger. Don't take my word for it, though, here's the Texas law that Roe overturned (https://www.sll.texas.gov/assets/pdf/historical-statutes/1925/1925-3-penal-code-of-the-state-of-texas.pdf#page=278). Read it yourself if you don't believe me, but it's your side that has been propagandized and spouts non-starters as if they're informed on the issue or historical context. In reality, your lack of SA is on blast.
So yeah, the left wants abortion because they believe it's a family planning tool, or a "bodily autonomy" issue, or some other such nonsense, but they use the above tropes as emotional wedges because it's easier to sell it that way. You know that and so does everyone else. So let's not avoid the issue by saying it's all about the "health of the mother" because it isn't, and it never was. Eliminating abortion at any point for frivolous reasons is what this is all about and most Americans agree that it shouldn't be used as birth control. That's all I get from the poll you posted.
-
1
-
3
-
-
3 hours ago, Biff_T said:
Do these "lib" demonstrators understand that abortion is a lib thing. What about women's rights? They seem to not care about those anymore, especially in Palestine. Try being gay or trans in Palestine. That is definitely not "cool" overthere. Fuck, draw a picture of Muhammad. You will be killed. A fucking picture. Art will get you killed. Freedom of speech is very limited as well.
It makes no sense to support Hamas as a lib. None.
Democrat and Republican are just words. Teams that people pick because they can't think for themselves. The words Democrat and Republican dont mean shit anymore.
"I just wanna get mad at someone too, so I support Hamas." - American Hamas supporters also known as retards.
One tenet helps me dive into issues like this that are so baffling (not saying you're confused). Namely, that there is no such thing as a contradiction in nature. If something like this doesn't fit (which it clearly does not), it's because we misunderstand something.
That "thing" as far as I can tell, is that the left is simply trying to upset the current power dynamic in the world. Whatever their reason - which I don't claim to know - it's the reason for this chaos. It's a tactic in order to create space to allow a different world view, philosophy, or power structure to arise.
-
4
-
-
2 hours ago, Biff_T said:
Fill the tunnels with human excrement.
Too late...
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
5
-
-
My take: you're waaaaaaaaay overthinking this.
-
1
-
1
-
1
-
-
11 hours ago, Biff_T said:
Limit Federal Government. We have individual states for a reason. Quit making laws that affect the entire country and let the states have more control. The system is already in place. Use it. We dont need as much Federal government. They have way too much power.
You dont like abortion? Dont live in CA.
You dont like the religious right? Dont live in Alabama.
Dont like overreaching government? Tell the Federal government to fuck off. We have legal cannabis in a lot of states and yet it is Federally illegal.
We have 50 states for reason. We don't all like the same shit.
I don't want some terd from NYC telling me how to live in Cypress CA. I already have enough terds here to deal with.
Dude, not to be pedantic, but turd is spelled with a 'u'.
-
3
-
-
1 hour ago, disgruntledemployee said:
As for the Chiner thing, if it comes to blows, maybe that debt they hold becomes worthless, that is, canceled.
Boom. Roasted. Stroke of a pen.
-
1
-
-
59 minutes ago, HeloDude said:
Unfortunately I’m referring to all administrations and political parties/Congresses, as well many high ranking military brass. Some are just a lot worse/more blatant than others. And yes, this administration doesn’t receive any high marks for defending the Constitution either.
Rog. And I hear you.
I will say though, that I've yet to see such immediate and blatant disregard for the rule of law. Exhibit #1 is the student loan "forgiveness" debacle. Joe Biden loses it in court, and then immediately turns around and says "fuck that." This is dangerously corrosive to the underlying system we have in place.
-
1
-
2
-
-
On 10/15/2023 at 4:08 AM, ClearedHot said:
Its been a while since I've read the entire document, I try to do it every few years
This is a good idea. It makes it very clear what certain things mean (i.e. the 2nd amendment) when you read the document in whole. It always baffles me why people zoom into the microcosm that is an amendment, while discarding the rest of the document. You'd think that the Constitution didn't mention militia anywhere else besides in the 2nd.
When read in whole, there is no question why the phrase "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms" was added.
-
1
-
-
On 10/14/2023 at 6:49 PM, HeloDude said:
Just remember that supporting the Constitution meant that it was ok to imprison American citizens just because of their ethnic background. Also, Milley supposedly supported the Constitution and said he wouldn’t the follow orders of the President and told our (supposed) enemy this as well.
One has to wonder if the Constitution doesn’t mean much anymore when it can be “interpreted” to suit an individual/group when desired.
You're referring to our current administration, right? The guy who loses a case in the Supreme Court and then immediately disregards the decision, turns around, and does the very thing that was just called illegal?
-
10 hours ago, Mark1 said:
While ironically acknowledging my stupidity for bothering to engage you on this...your stupidity is tiresome.
When a person is infected by a SARS virus they have an immune response. In a small number of cases that immune response has collateral impacts on the body.
When a person is vaccinated against a SARS virus they have [functionally] the same immune response. In a small number of cases that immune response has collateral impacts on the body. Sound familiar? The difference being that they are not also under threat of a replicating virus that can overwhelm the body's ability to defend itself.
It's no surprise to thinking people that the same increase in risk of cardiac inflammation that comes with infection also comes with vaccination. It would be surprising if that was not the case given that, from the immune system's perspective, vaccination is indistinguishable from infection (with a few links in the response chain bypassed by mRNA).
The only question then is does the overall reduction in risk through vaccination outweigh that of exposing 'everyone' to the collateral immune response risk when a small portion of them may otherwise avoid ever being exposed to viral infection.
And the answer is yes...by orders of magnitude.Thankfully the people employed to come to these conclusions are typically not exceptionally vulnerable to tribal group-think conspiracy movements, and they base their conclusions on reality.You may now return to wasting your life away by willfully sifting through all the wrong information in order to find the next trump-card that isn't a trump-card.
Most of what you said was true, buuuuuuuut it's also wholly irrelevant. Since the vaccine doesn't stop transmission, it's not anyone's business whether or not you decide to take it. This is a free country, and that means people get to make decisions for themselves, both good and bad.
Think about your logic for 2 seconds dude. The vaccine was forced on all of us, and yet everyone got exposed anyway. Read that last part over and over until it sinks in.
-
1
-
1
-
3
-
-
18 hours ago, ClearedHot said:
F-ing NitWit sold off half of the SPR for politics...what could possibly go wrong when we might have a hot war in the Middle East.
Biden sold off nearly half the U.S. oil reserve. Is it ready for a crisis?Stock up on XOM/BP/USO/SHELL.
Dems never look beyond one dimension when they're making decisions.
-
1
-
-
On 10/8/2023 at 8:57 AM, Lord Ratner said:
Why are people in the military allowed to murder, yet I cannot murder my neighbor for playing loud music?
Ummm, point of order. People in the military are not allowed to murder.
pluralmurders: the crime of unlawfully and unjustifiably killing a person-
1
-
-
On 10/4/2023 at 4:20 PM, HeloDude said:
Ummm, I’m all about hunting animals and then eating them. And I don’t know how many people who like to hunt are trying to kill people and eat them. A little devils advocate here, but I think you need a better argument.
I got no problem with meat (sts) or hunting for food. I do have a problem with intentional disregard for life and causing suffering for the sake of a more powerful entity's pleasure. Surely you can distinguish this. Tell me you can see the difference between these two things. FFS.
On 10/4/2023 at 5:06 PM, HeloDude said:Words matter though. And there are millions of people in this country that do make that argument…PETA members for example. There are even those that are telling us that the Kentucky Derby is cruel to animals. I don’t support what this guy did whatsoever, but if you can kill animals for sport alone, it only goes to show that there is no such thing as “animal rights”.
No animals don't have "rights" in the same sense that humans do. But then again, there is no golden tablet floating out there in the universe that enshrines what rights humans have either. But I also know you know the difference between trophy hunting and torturing an animal to death. Those things are different. I know you know that.
-
2 hours ago, Biff_T said:
Is he a lib or repub, Im not sure if I'm supposed to like him or make up an excuse as to why he strangled dogs with jumper cables? He is black man, so it's probably my fault somehow. Why strangle the dogs when you can shoot them in the head with a 45? Fucking idiot.
Edit: "Macho Man" Ran Savage. The guy has the name to be involved in wrestling whether its humans or dogs lol.
Because he's a bad and evil person. If he thought he could get away with it, he'd be doing it to people. That's how psychopaths operate.
Russian Ukraine shenanigans
in General Discussion
Posted
@BashiChuni, I want Ukraine to win, but that is absolutely absurd statement by Yellen. Up is down.