Jump to content

Dupe

Supreme User
  • Posts

    642
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by Dupe

  1. Now I am confused... (not hard to do)

    I have my Mil Comp CFI testing done, but I haven't taken it to a FSDO yet. Once I do that and get the rating added, I have to hand-carry a copy of my Form 8 to the FSDO to renew every 12 months?

    Some DPEs (Designated Pilot Examiners - essentially franchised EPs) can do the mil comp for you. I know one guy at Eglin who does it for $200. They charge, but sometimes they are more convenient than getting to a FSDO.

    Go here: http://av-info.faa.gov/DesigneeSearch.asp

    Put "Military Competency / Foreign Pilot Examiner" in the designee tab

  2. what does renew with checkride mean? I can send in a copy of my most recent Form 8 that's less than 12 months old as proof and reset my CFI clock?

    Yes... but you'll have to do it in person vice mail it in.

    61.197 (a) A person who holds a flight instructor certificate that has not expired may renew that flight instructor certificate by—

    (2) Submitting a completed and signed application with the FAA and satisfactorily completing one of the following renewal requirements

    (iv) A record showing that, within the preceding 12 months from the month of application, the flight instructor passed an official U.S. Armed Forces military instructor pilot proficiency check.

  3. I have to read more: I thought AFPAK hands didn't have an ADSC, but the underlying training/PCSs did.

    It may be as simple as 7-day opting when the language school RIP comes around.

    Why the hell do they put flyers in this program? Or Air Force at all?

    Some are legitimately interested in serving in this way. It could lead to work in the Intel community, the State Dept, or NGOs post retirement.

    Of course, it gets F-ed up when the AF picks guys who don't want to do it or who won't be good at it just to pay some perceived higher level manpower bill.

  4. I think what you will find is that once the Gen is removed from the chain of command that his potential "influence" is eliminated. Thus the reason that a GO from outside 19AF is now going to listen to the arguments and make the decision in this case. It preserves the MAJCOM CC ability to act impartially in the future as well.

    The defense would argue that the influence already happened and the publicity behind it all continues to influence any potential panel member. I looked ...I didn't find anything (granted...I'm an armchair lawyer here). There's no case law that I could find that answers "Is the influence removed if the commander is?"

  5. Couldn't the prosecutor counter by saying "and then he got fired for it?" Proving it wasn't appropriate?

    Perhaps. We'll never know. Military law is interesting in that there just isn't much case law behind it. Based on how legal assignments work, there aren't that many experts in the field either.

  6. I am not sure that his decision is irrevocable, but I would bet that the accused and his ADC would be unwilling to roll the dice on the possible consequences. A 15 for an officer is typically limited to half a months pay x2. A federal conviction and much harsher potential penalties are a steep difference. JAGs typically do not support a 15 when they cannot make the case in court.

    I agree... sticking with the Article 15 is probably best as its consequences are limited.

    Can you explain how you think this amounts to UCI?

    Fair warning up front: this gets quickly to arm-chair lawyering, and I'm not a lawyer.

    This isn't UCI as there isn't a court martial, so there is nothing for the commander to influence. That said, here's the definition of UCI:

    No authority convening a general, special, or summary court-martial, nor any other commanding officer, may censure, reprimand, or admonish the court or any member, military judge, or counsel thereof, with respect to the findings or sentence adjudged by the court, or with respect to any other exercises of its or his functions in the conduct of the proceedings. No person subject to this chapter may attempt to coerce or, by any unauthorized means, influence the action of a court-martial or any other military tribunal or any member thereof, in reaching the findings or sentence in any case, or the action of any convening, approving, or reviewing authority with respect to his judicial acts.

    By making his statements, Maj Gen Keltz could be seen as influencing every single member of the 19AF into believing that the accused is guilty. The defense would argue that this is "influence to reaching the findings of the case." If the defendent choses to take this to trial (not very likely), a UCI petition would be the first one filed from the defense.

  7. Except for the fact that by this point the accused has already elected to accept the Article 15 process. Then the accused also asked to make a presentation and that it be made public. Those decisions then get us to this point...

    Back to you regular sport bitching.

    Not that I would in this case, but isn't there a path for the defendant to remove his consent to the Article 15 process?

  8. The problem with that, minus the comment from Maj Gen Keltz, is that if he was found guilty there's much bigger punishment that could be given instead of one handed down from a Art 15. If he had any doubt (or the ADC/Defense) that he would be found guilty in a court martial, he was wise to take the Art 15.

    An ADC could press for a court martial then file to get the whole thing tossed due to undue command influence.

  9. quote-Mark-Twain-never-pick-a-fight-with

    I think this means not to fight the print media as they "guided" public opinion in the 19th century. Not sure I connect the dots here...

    Do tell more please.

    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

    TPS was a really fun year, but its essentially a series of week or two-week long survey courses strung together to form a year. The idea is that, in total, all grads will have a working knowledge of the entirety of the military flight test profession. Each one week block is someone's PhD and 30-year engineering career. TPS is breadth where WIC seeks depth.

    Operational Test and Developmental Test have different goals and different paths to resolve issues found in testing. I found that often my bros in OT had more power than I in the test phase as issues found in DT basically get resolved via committee decision with the program office. Part of TPS is learning how the acquisitions sausage gets made.

    I have found my outside-the-AF career options to be greater since TPS. There simply is no civilian equivalent to being an experienced aviator knowledgable in a wide range fo flight test topics. At various points in the recent past, I have seriously considered flying jobs for Boeing and Garmin.

  10. Hey dudes/dudettes, I have been reading this thread and talking to anyone I could find about getting in to TPS.

    Why do you want to go to TPS?

    I ask because there are test jobs out there that are pretty damn relevant but don't require going to a year of hodge-podge academics and a life in AFMC.

  11. NMCI sucked pus-covered gangrenous donkey balls while I was in the other service; I haven't heard anything in the years since to indicate it's gotten any better.

    The green-ness of the grass on that side is an illusion.

    Edit: spell more gooder

    The problem is that there simply isn't the bodies at the base level to do a good job. Rather than one monster service contract, there will be lots of little ones. It will be happening very soon with email. Base data centers will also be contractor operated soon.

  12. I just 7-day opted an assignment with 19 months remaining on my UPT ADSC. I didn't want to incur the CONUS PCS ADSC of 24 months. My DOS was set the day after my UPT ADSC expires!

    Everyone from the Group/CC on down, to include the assignments guy at AFPC was adamant I couldn't 7-day opt....but I did!

    Assignment cancelled and told to remain in place to finish out my ADSC.

    Funny that the GP/CC was rebuffing you. I see this as ADSC 101. The AF can't extend your commitment without your agreement.

  13. In the investment world, there's the idea of the risk vs return frontier.

    http://www.youngresearch.com/authors/ejsmith/risk-and-reward-an-efficient-frontier/

    In life, there's the bullshit vs benefits frontier. The AF keeps talking about benefits, but leaves the idea of the cost of those benefits (the bullshit) off the table. It's not that the airlines pay more... It's that a low six figure salary for working 12 days a month is a compelling proposition to many.

    This rough arguement is the same in many areas: a shit hot cyber warrior may ask "Why am I working 14-16 hour days to answer data calls? I could just found my own start-up."

    To Gen Welsh's Staff: I know you are reading this. How the AF distributes the bullshit in a BCA environment will be linked to retention in future years.

  14. Oh c'mon, you know I win! TPS grad CSO, sole staff instructor CSO at TPS, qualified on multiple AFSOC platforms including the AC-J (who gave the first ever checkride on the AC-J? This guy!). RIFd.

    And hey look, my AFSC is on the stressed career fields list a few posts back! Oh, and right after I got notified, they assigned one of new grad RC-135 CSOs to a C-130 unit.

    Left hand, meet right hand.

    I think you did win! Escape velocity, a pile of cash, and a fair bit of useful know. Stop that GS shit and go start your own company.

  15. I think you win for the most fucked up personnel story I've ever heard. A1/AFPC are just unbelievably retarded.

    I'm a Test Pilot School graduate F-15E WSO with a current 1042 and IWSO form 8. I have experience in the newest F-15E radar about to hit the street as well as the SDB II.

    I am currently a program manager for IT systems (with no experience in that area what-so ever). I ask myself every day why I am here and why @17D_guy is not.

    Thankfully, this dream ends soon with IDE.

×
×
  • Create New...