Jump to content

Leaderboard

Popular Content

Showing content with the highest reputation on 07/19/2025 in all areas

  1. Am I bad for laughing? 604740-0a42fbf187827f66e69b80b818b0f66a.mp4
    2 points
  2. Where the f are you buying eggs lol
    2 points
  3. Hey look, SIG is having a sale...https://www.sigsauer.com/
    2 points
  4. So. I'm kind of on both sides of the fence on this one. I think if Epstein was running an espionage operation, officially or unofficially, then Trump, Clinton, Bill Gates, and others who went to the island are almost certainly implicated. However. There does not seem to be any evidence that this was anything other than a guy who liked to rape little girls and, completely separately, hang out with other rich and famous people. With that many girls involved you would have more than one or two named witnesses. You would have people closely associated, even if they couldn't corroborate, with more than just "it happened." There would be something. And right now it looks like there is nothing. If Epstein had a list of compromised clients, I believe it's completely possible that list was kept in physical form and could be destroyed. But that doesn't erase the dozens or hundreds of associated parties that just aren't turning up. Like I said, if it was more than a pervert and his girlfriend raping girls on an island, then I think it is more likely than not that Trump is implicated. But it is increasingly looking like there's no one else
    1 point
  5. That's what they deserve for attending a Cold Play concert!
    1 point
  6. Agreed, if guilty, fry him along with all of the others involved!
    1 point
  7. If there was any evidence that the Donald had sexually abused kids the dems would have used it/published it. The WSJ piece was another big hyped up nothing burger.
    1 point
  8. 1 point
  9. I guess rape is cool. If Trump raped tweens and had a man murdered, then he can put all of those cheap eggs into his ass.
    1 point
  10. Yup Never gonna happen but the need for a light inexpensive (in airplane money) to operate aircraft capable of the mission demanded by the light attack armed reconnaissance mission has overlap with primary / intermediate military flight training, seems like the AT-6 could have been not just an answer to LAAR but also an evolution over the T-6 without as much disruption to that part of the UPT enterprise. Rugged & reliable for high use rate / repetitive sorties. Benign flight characteristics for student pilots, inexperienced foreign pilots in training but capable of acro / defensive maneuvers for missions. Economical costs in acquisition and sustainment. A simple training sortie would cost as much as much as a complex sortie, in flight hour cost, normalizing over a syllabus. In your intermediate phase of training, it would give you a wider syllabus before you tracked and specialized. Just my opinion Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    1 point
  11. Gavin Newsom is not going to make the US any better, look at California. He's bay area royalty. He may not have been to Epstein's rape island, but he's still a shady politician. I'm so tired of only having pieces of human excrement as the choices to "lead" the land of the free. I wouldn't trust Newsom with the popcorn maker.
    1 point
×
×
  • Create New...