F.T.

The "Early Analysis" of Mr McSpadden (AOPA) on YouTube was my first source on the topic. Now, after the release of the Preliminary Report of the NTSB it appears to me as an one-sided, sublime and refined blaming of Mr. Hutain, the fighter pilot. In this highly praised analysis he puts forward one thesis, which assumptions does not match with the facts which were revealed shortly after. The lack of an update and the tendency of the posts highlighted on YouTube, this all combined leaves more than a stale after-taste. And then there is this article on the AOPA-page from December 7, 2022 by Alyssa J. Cobb, which reads like an justification of the airboss. Quote: "In this case, the aircraft had sequential separation with the fighter formation instructed to fly in front of the bomber formation and lateral separation with the two different show lines." Completely disregarding the decisive question about crossing flight-paths at the same altitude. How is that seen by the experts? (Sorry for mistakes - no native-speaker)