Instead of playing a game of one-upmanship, I went back and re-read all your posts to make sure I didn't misconstruct anything. Some points have merit...your original question was "what's different this time?" is valid for any operation, and in this one, to paraphrase other posts, it's difficult to bomb someone to the stone age when they're already there.
However, let me ask what you would do if you were the ultimate decider, to stop the Houthis from sending TBMs & OWA drones into an ally's territory, and were attacking innocent ships of all nations traveling through the BAM?
There are three basic options: do nothing, full-scale nuclear war, or something in between.
An oppositional attitude can be useful in the planning process...too many yes-men and there's no critical thought developing the plan.
You're obviously not a fan of the current COA, so what would you do differently? I'm truly interested.