-
The Next President is...
@Lord Ratner and @M2 want to believe in the “convenient” conspiracy that no one other than Epstein was involved (such a bizarre take). I ask you, is there no evidence of trafficking? Or is there evidence that there is a coverup of who they were trafficked to (what has been alleged all along)? https://www.justice.gov/multimedia/Court%20Records/Matter%20of%20the%20Estate%20of%20Jeffrey%20E.%20Epstein,%20Deceased,%20No.%20ST-21-RV-00005%20(V.I.%20Super.%20Ct.%202021)/2022.03.17-1%20Exhibit%201.pdf “A 15-year old victim was forced into sexual acts with Epstein and others and then attempted to escape by swimming off the Little St. James Island. Epstein and others organized a search party that located her and kept her captive by, among other things, confiscating her passport. Another victim, who was first engaged in provide massages to Epstein, was then forced to perform sexual acts at Little St. James in the Virgin Islands. When she attempted to escape the "private island," Epstein and a search party found her, returned her to his house, and suggested physical restraint or harm if she failed to cooperate.” “Associates in the Epstein Enterprise recruited both victims and abusers into the Epstein Enterprise, participated in sexual acts of rape and abuse of minors and witnessed Epstein and others engage in sexual acts with children.”
-
The Next President is...
Why did they redact Donald Trumps name in this release? Seems by the definition of the law to be illegal. Before: Now:
-
The Next President is...
You guys enjoying the Epstein files coverup?
-
Trump's Cabinet
Certainly that’s the other narrative, although it’s hard to see what’s giving you confidence in it over the alternative. The legislator was quoted saying that the boat was already a “destroyed vessel” and that they didn’t have any “means of locomotion.” I guess if that were true, would it then be problematic in your eyes?
-
Trump's Cabinet
Rep Hines after viewing today said “You have two individuals in clear distress without any means of locomotion, with a destroyed vessel, who are killed by the United States.” If true, seems like that’d be pretty cut and dry based on the DoW law of war manual:
lmaolol
Registered User
-
Joined
-
Last visited