Jump to content

nonflyboy

Registered User
  • Posts

    19
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by nonflyboy

  1. 9 hours ago, goboldtigers said:

     

     

    I'll add my $0.02 to this discussion, as  someone that was confused why I'm an alternate but 2 others from my wing were selected. You can look at my comment history in this thread for more details but short story: I had better scores and numbers, stratted  higher from the wing, and had a Wg/CC sign my letter of rec. I'm an alternate but they were selected. The other 2 from the wing had objectively worse applications in every measurable way. Emphasis on objectively. 

    So I emailed the board. I asked about the alternate process and as an after thought at the end of the email, I asked "how I can improve my application for next year's board, specifically anything subjective they noticed". (I didn't complain about the above situation, I knew that wouldn't look good). They replied explaining the board uses an algorithm to help quantify subjective packages. Only 30% of your score comes from PCSM, AFOQT, college GPA, etc. I don't remember what the other 30% and 40% was exactly, but one of them is leadership and experience. They said really good test scores don't mean as much for an otherwise average application. They made sure to tell me my application was above average but this board was very competitive and my chances of being selected next year are good. It helped to read that last bit but still stung haha.

    This coincided with the feedback I received from my Gp/CC. The other 2 from the wing are the same AFSC but have been doing it longer than me. So by default, by doing the job longer, they have had more leadership opportunities and experience to present to the board. Also, their scores were decent too. I've had a  bright start to my career, but I'm "young".

    Anyways, if I've interpreted all of this feedback correctly, what you've done in your career and how well you communicate it to the board is just as important, if not more important, than every number on the AF215 combined. I definitely know how to improve that for next year. Food for thought. 

    Edit: incase it wasn't clear. The things the board probably are looking closely at is the personal letter, letter of recommendation, the 3 bullets from your rater and 3 bullets from your senior rater. Specifically how robust they are. They can tell if it's a bunch of fluff or something meaningful. All of the test scores, PCSM, etc are likely just checking a box for the board. 

    Well said boss

  2. 12 minutes ago, dillonberg92 said:

    By chance, Is anyone now looking at the guard path to UPT? Heavily considering it, with how difficult it seems to get picked up.

    Sent from my SM-G986U using Tapatalk
     

    Yes. But it’s probably just as difficult tbh. I’m willing to put in the work tho. Everyone’s telling me to go guard instead

    • Like 2
  3. 50 minutes ago, AlexLM12 said:

    Also if anyone is able to get a screenshot of the results, could they post it? Not sure if that would be allowed, but it WILL be publically released soon. Only asking because alot of us still don't have access to the PDSM

    I think that's pushing the line since its CUI and this is a public site. but honestly bro, DM me and ill look you up

  4. Just now, AlexLM12 said:

    This does not instill confidence, but I appreciate you sharing so we can all temper our expectations and not be surprised when it seems like we get an unexpected result. There seems to be nothing predictable to how they are selecting. Not that there isn't a system, but it certainly does not seem that methodical

    yeah i still haven't heard anything.  But the only thing i can think of in this situation is whole airman?   So sorry man, best of luck if you decline and reapply

  5. 22 minutes ago, FlyingHog said:

    My Wg/CC had to contact the MPF but I still haven't been informed because my Gp/CC is in a meeting with the Wg/CC. The exec did tell me they have the results though. Just makes the wait worse.

    my wing exec doesn't know where to look.  any help?

  6. On 12/30/2022 at 5:18 PM, goboldtigers said:

    Not to mention when it is time to pass results, they don't even tell you via email or mail or anything direct. They notify your CoC, when your commander eventually tells you. 
     

    I mean, it makes sense the commander should know if he's losing a guy but still...

    What will be worse is when one of you guys find out and everyone else is still in the dark…..

    • Like 3
    • Haha 2
    • Sad 2
  7. On 12/3/2022 at 12:42 PM, Beaux said:

    Unfortunately no. They same source who told me there were 40 slots told me the board was able to find more. But everything is speculation until we get official word. 
    Welcome to the forum. I was a long time lurker before I became a member to post. 

    man looks like a few others also heard this rumor.  Which sucks, because we were being told to expect the same amount as last year (which was 100).  So best of luck to everyone....now we wait.

  8. On 11/22/2022 at 2:09 PM, Beaux said:

    Heard that the board was able to find more slots than originally forecasted but that’s it. No exact numbers.

    man "able to find more slots" i really hope that was based off the projected 100 and not this 40 number that's getting tossed around.  Are you able to elaborate any more?

    And I didn't know this forum existed, i found it via reddit under the 2021 UFT board thread.

×
×
  • Create New...