Jump to content

FlightTime

Registered User
  • Posts

    5
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by FlightTime

  1. On 7/17/2016 at 3:54 PM, innovator said:

    Whenever I have asked someone about their experience in an airframe, I have always heard nothing but positive things. I am sure most of all airframes are a blast to fly, but like anything else there has to be cons as well. Most students tend to decide on what they want to fly based on what they see at an airshow or a tv show, but there is always more to it when you get into the thick of things.   

    If you are currently flying one of these airframes or have flown them in the past, could you provide current feedback and opinion on the following subjects? Honest rants and praise on these platforms much appreciated.

    1.  Ops Tempo/Deployment

          2.  Lifestyle/ Family Stability

          3. Community morale

          4. Advancements & Future of the airframe

          5. Preferred PCS locations 

     

    I'm a little late to the fight here but dude, your engrish is f'ing terrible. 

    Seriously guys? 

    • Downvote 21
  2. A guy I know faced the standard ADSC shennanigans from AFPC for AFT a year or so ago and decided to just fill out his own ADSC form (FM 63 or whatever it is) and put "00 (zero) years" in the commitment duration spot and then put the verbiage about referencing note 1b right next to it.  He signed it and sent it off and said it worked like a charm.  A bit like a guy I read about who put down a 0% APR on his credit card application and had it approved.  I thought it was a pretty crafty way to limit the headache of fighting with AFPC down the road.  It sounded like AFPC primarily cares about having a signed copy of that form to complete whatever "checklist" they have and the folks doing it obviously dont QC what is on the form versus what should be on the form.  I'll buy a case of beer for anyone that puts down "e^i*pi + 1". 

    • Upvote 6
×
×
  • Create New...