Jump to content

Promotion and PRF Information


Guest e3racing

Recommended Posts

On 1/10/2019 at 9:28 AM, Skitzo said:

 


Are they going to bump BTZ DP to 15%?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

I didn't realize DP allocations were separate for BPZ and I/ABZ. 

So what was the DP BPZ allocation this year?  Anyone have an idea historically what percentage of DP BPZs get promoted?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

BPZ DP allocation was 15%.

Last year, BPZ pilots with IDE had a ~44% select rate if I recall correctly.

 

They will fix the glitch in manning by promoting more BPZ.

 

Honestly it is smart you don’t need to be a Lt Col to be a commander. Now because they have to be they will make them sooner.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Last 5 years, DP rate for IPZ was 55%

all of the 55% make it (for the most part) plus the next 15%....  around 70%

DP tate for BPZ was 10%

roughly 25% of the 10% make it

 

there are more BPZ than IPZ, so it end up being 75%

 

these are estimated.  Don’t hold me to it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Check RAW via AFPC secure, but I think it just breaks it down by IDE/no IDE.

In-res is masked. That said, you can bet anyone who makes it BPZ was in-res.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

When it shows on your duty history and you have a TR from the school...it isn’t masked.

It’s masked as far as the official numbers/AFPC static reports indicate. Obviously the board

Is able to see who is in-res between narrative PRF, TR, and student status on their career brief.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ThreeHoler said:

 

 


When it shows on your duty history and you have a TR from the school...it isn’t masked.

 

 

This is technically true.  Also, if the board is specifically instructed not to consider in-res vs non-res then it shouldn't matter (in a perfect world).

Of course, unless Wg/CCs are also instructed to not consider in-res vs non-res in their allocation of DPs, it is still an issue.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Homestar said:

This is technically true.  Also, if the board is specifically instructed not to consider in-res vs non-res then it shouldn't matter (in a perfect world).

Of course, unless Wg/CCs are also instructed to not consider in-res vs non-res in their allocation of DPs, it is still an issue.

Senior raters are instructed to not consider whether someone has completed IDE in corespondence when making nominations for IDE in Res central board and when determining DP allocation for BPZ.  However, I think it’s a pretty safe assumption some, not all, senior raters and/or MLR members ignore this guidance.   One thing is for certain: Completing an in-res IDE program or being en route to an in-res IDE program is a trump card for BPZ consideration and, at a minimum, makes you a lock IPZ.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, celtic020 said:

Senior raters are instructed to not consider whether someone has completed IDE in corespondence when making nominations for IDE in Res central board and when determining DP allocation for BPZ.  However, I think it’s a pretty safe assumption some, not all, senior raters and/or MLR members ignore this guidance.   One thing is for certain: Completing an in-res IDE program or being en route to an in-res IDE program is a trump card for BPZ consideration and, at a minimum, makes you a lock IPZ.  

I had a former OG and WG commander state in no uncertain terms that they absolutely used correspondence as a discriminator for in res after your first look. That WG/CC is now wearing a star. I think it's safe to assume they treated DP the same way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Goddamn all this talk reminds me with shivers what AD goes through...a mystical journey with ever-changing rules shrouded in secrecy where success is mostly a question of luck and timing.

Mercy on your souls for staying with AD. I know not everyone has a choice to exit early. Best of...luck to those who remain. It’s literally the sharpest tool in your bag.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, ImNotARobot said:

Goddamn all this talk reminds me with shivers what AD goes through...a mystical journey with ever-changing rules shrouded in secrecy where success is mostly a question of luck and timing.

Mercy on your souls for staying with AD. I know not everyone has a choice to exit early. Best of...luck to those who remain. It’s literally the sharpest tool in your bag.

And Wing/CCs blatantly ignoring CSAF and SECAF guidance.  Can’t blame fingers for this mess when his minions’ minions run this monkey show. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel fortunate my senior rater (Air Force 2-Star) did not use correspondence as a discriminator for in-res nominations.  I had almost none of it done when I got selected for in-res.  At least some folks are following the guidance, which actually makes sense.  Using correspondence as a discriminator means they actually want you to do IDE twice....which is as dumb as it sounds. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I had almost none of it done when I got selected for in-res.  At least some folks are following the guidance, which actually makes sense.  Using correspondence as a discriminator means they actually want you to do IDE twice....which is as dumb as it sounds. 


Yet, for some reason, you had started doing exactly that?

Bendy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Bender said:

 


Yet, for some reason, you had started doing exactly that?

Bendy

 

Was sort of hedging my bets approaching my last look for IDE in-res in case I was not selected as the window between non-select notification and IPZ board is somewhat tight.  But your point is well-received -- I hope Fingers' intent will come to fruition regarding the IDE selection process because it directly impacted me favorably as a non-shiny penny, slightly above average O-3 turned pretty good O-4  who kept working hard rather than the legacy system where your career track was pre-ordained simply based on whether you were a school select on your O-4 board or not.    

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was sort of hedging my bets approaching my last look for IDE in-res in case I was not selected as the window between non-select notification and IPZ board is somewhat tight.  But your point is well-received -- I hope Fingers' intent will come to fruition regarding the IDE selection process because it directly impacted me favorably as a non-shiny penny, slightly above average O-3 turned pretty good O-4  who kept working hard rather than the legacy system where your career track was pre-ordained simply based on whether you were a school select on your O-4 board or not.    

Dude. It doesn’t matter. The only reason to go to that is if you want to. Don’t do something that you don’t really want to at this stage in your life. If you want what it brings then try to go in res. If you don’t want it or don’t care then it’s gut check time. You have to start thinking about what you want to do and if you are ok separating or retiring as a major. If you are then why all of the stress over something you don’t even want?
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, pawnman said:

Here I thought you guys were talking about using the method of completion as a discriminator, not doing it by correspondence first to get picked up in residence.

How it should be...

If the boss wants a guy to be a CC then offer an in res.

Min running an online course just to get a promotion/show you care/being a company man clearly falls under “what’s wrong with the AF”

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...