Jump to content

Aviation Continuation Pay (ACP - The Bonus)


Toro

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, brabus said:

Also, a common misguidance is “well I just don’t need that much money.” Totally agree, but what you will value for sure is an exceptionally large increase in QOL (with ability to choose whenever you want to give up some off days to make all that money to pay cash for the kitchen remodel your wife wants). I significantly underestimated QOL gains, it’s a real thing that just can’t be realized until you break free of the only work life you’ve known since you were 18-22ish. 

 

This has been a pretty common misconception by many of my squadron mates.  The only ones who come back on orders, are the guys who are within 5 years of their 20.  The rest have gotten a taste of the QOL and are now DSGs for life.  It's funny is seeing the "I'm never going to the airline" types, especially the ones who gave airline guys shit, who are now DSG for life because of how good the QOL is for them.

 

Unfortunately, I had to go on orders in early December and I forgot how bad being full time sucks.  I've worked more in the last two months than I did in the last 5 months of 2022 at Delta...never mind the massive pay hit.  I guess if all I did was show up, fly and go home, it wouldn't be terrible.  But I don't think people realize how much of life in the military is fighting one self-imposed (by the AF) roadblock after another.  It's completely maddening and what makes me dread getting up and going to work almost every day right now.  It's something you don't grasp until you have a job where all you have to do is fly and you're not constantly fighting just to get basic shit done.  Then the huge added benefit is that you don't take work home with you!  The end of these orders can't get here fast enough!

 

16 hours ago, Danger41 said:

Thoughts on having AD retirement safety net instead of hustling ANG?

 

 

I'm nothing close to a weapons officer, but "it depends..."  My recommendation to all our young guys is that if you even think you may to the airlines at some point, I'd get hired ASAP because seniority is everything.  If you're within 5 years of a 20 year retirement, depending on how far you'll go for orders, then I'd imagine it wouldn't be all that hard to get to 20 while out on MLOA.  Lots of orders floating around the system...ask Brabus

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SocialD said:

If you're within 5 years of a 20 year retirement, depending on how far you'll go for orders, then I'd imagine it wouldn't be all that hard to get to 20 while out on MLOA.  Lots of orders floating around the system...ask Brabus

...from a completely different perspective: I punched from AD at 17 years and am about to finish my 3rd good year in the AFRC.  I AM NOT GOING ON ORDERS.  I just rolled into year two at my major airline, and you would have to throw 7-figures+ a year at me to get me to go active for 3 more years.  The BS level is simply not worth it, and the arithmetic is a wash on that active retirement.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites



Do I get joint credit for that?

It’s funny, two of the last sets of orders I took brought me to AOCs (607 and 609) and both of them allowed me to have a beer with people from this community.

Just another reason to put yourself out there and find something out of the ordinary to participate in.







Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

Not to mention great midnight chow friends while “slaving away” at an Osan exercise!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, herkbum said:


Not to mention great midnight chow friends while “slaving away” at an Osan exercise!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dude Checkertails at 2am during exercise weeks is some of the best memories I have in my life. That shit was awesome. 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, BroncoEN said:

Seems that April is the approximate date for the bonus announcement. Is ANG the same? Pondering AGR orders if a nice bonus is associated, just no idea the timeline when the bonus will be announced after this new NDAA

ANG usually is around that time, but never seems to be exactly coincident with AD. Do you have a line number!?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, BroncoEN said:

Seems that April is the approximate date for the bonus announcement. Is ANG the same? Pondering AGR orders if a nice bonus is associated, just no idea the timeline when the bonus will be announced after this new NDAA

 

 

Do yourself a favor and stop pondering...

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, brabus said:

ANG usually is around that time, but never seems to be exactly coincident with AD. Do you have a line number!?

Thanks for the info! Yea I have a line number, AGR might be right due to family circumstances for a bit… TBD 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 1/11/2023 at 11:49 PM, nsplayr said:

Dude this kind of shit infuriates me. Congress passed a law, it's signed by the President, it directs the DoD to do X,Y, or Z. The DoD then fails to take any action, can't update AFIs in a timely fashion, provides vague or no business rule guidance or policy memos, and then just fucking gets away with it sometimes for YEARS. If I were a Congressman I would unscrew heads and start shitting down necks until the law was implemented.

This same thing has happened with the 2021 NDAA expanded baby leave on the Guard side. I've literally been told I (and quite a few other guys in my unit) fall into an "unfortunate Catch-22" that prevents us from taking the leave...it's shenanigans. We had babies (well, our wives did, thanks dear!), we earned the leave, but we can't take it, what kind of fuckery is that? Our local-level commanders are pissed and sympathetic, but they are hamstrung by MAJCOM and NGB nonners who are saying it can't be done.

An officer's job, IMHO, is to receive intent from his/her superiors all the way up to the NCA, and then apply his/her knowledge, skills, leadership, creativity and ingenuity in order to meet that intent with appropriate effects on the battlefield, however that is defined for your career field.

Somehow every single one (ok, to be fair, 99.69%) of our personnelists and finance officers seems to have missed that very important lesson from their commissioning source and subsequent PME. As a group, they are pedantic, lawyerly, miserly bean counter shoe clerks who treat every single dollar as if it's coming out of their own personal wallet and scour every single potentially beneficial personnel policy for loopholes and ways they can fuck people over rather than implementing the intent of the policy as written.

/rant off

Well looks like the Air Force's lap dog agrees with not paying us the full flight pay:

https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA669-1.html

Key Findings

  • The yearly cost increase associated with paying members of the RC risk pay and flight pay at the full monthly rate would range from $46.3 million to $88.5 million annually, or 100 percent to 194 percent over the baseline of $45.7 million annually. Although the cost increase would represent a substantial increase in the S&I pay budget, it would be small relative to the overall RC personnel budget: less than 0.4 percent for fiscal year 2021.
  • RC members serve more periods per month than the stereotypical one weekend per month and two weeks in the summer. The implication is that the cost increase associated with a full-rate S&I pay policy is less than expected because RC members are already paid closer to the full monthly rate than expected.
  • The number of RC members who would qualify or would potentially qualify for either hazardous duty incentive pay or aviation incentive pay in a given month ranges from 17,796 to 379,148 (out of more than 800,000 total members).
  • The full-rate policy could reduce incentives to participate in the RC for more than the minimum required training periods. Thus, the full-rate policy would adversely affect readiness. Furthermore, the full monthly rate policy would be inefficient because it would increase costs while potentially reducing participation—i.e., paying more for less.

From my scientific research (IE asking around the sq) this is not the story I've gathered but I'm sure their simulations are smarter than asking actual people.......I know in my small corner of the woods a lot of our min runners (IE dudes who show up MAYBE once a quarter would actually start flying at least a local once a month....

My guess is will be the BS ammo they try and present Congress to get out of paying us full flight pay....

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, HeyWatchThis said:

Well looks like the Air Force's lap dog agrees with not paying us the full flight pay:

https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA669-1.html

Key Findings

  • The yearly cost increase associated with paying members of the RC risk pay and flight pay at the full monthly rate would range from $46.3 million to $88.5 million annually, or 100 percent to 194 percent over the baseline of $45.7 million annually. Although the cost increase would represent a substantial increase in the S&I pay budget, it would be small relative to the overall RC personnel budget: less than 0.4 percent for fiscal year 2021.
  • RC members serve more periods per month than the stereotypical one weekend per month and two weeks in the summer. The implication is that the cost increase associated with a full-rate S&I pay policy is less than expected because RC members are already paid closer to the full monthly rate than expected.
  • The number of RC members who would qualify or would potentially qualify for either hazardous duty incentive pay or aviation incentive pay in a given month ranges from 17,796 to 379,148 (out of more than 800,000 total members).
  • The full-rate policy could reduce incentives to participate in the RC for more than the minimum required training periods. Thus, the full-rate policy would adversely affect readiness. Furthermore, the full monthly rate policy would be inefficient because it would increase costs while potentially reducing participation—i.e., paying more for less.

From my scientific research (IE asking around the sq) this is not the story I've gathered but I'm sure their simulations are smarter than asking actual people.......I know in my small corner of the woods a lot of our min runners (IE dudes who show up MAYBE once a quarter would actually start flying at least a local once a month....

My guess is will be the BS ammo they try and present Congress to get out of paying us full flight pay....

How the fuck does any person with a general sense of reason and logic come to the bolded conclusion? "If we pay them more they will work less, so don't pay them more!" WTF? 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t see how there is a single correlation between flight pay amount and effort at work. Higher flight pay is one tool to make the overall compensation higher in an attempt to keep guys from jumping to the airlines, that’s all it does. Rand took a massive swing and a miss on this one. 

Edited by brabus
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, brabus said:

I don’t see how there is a single correlation between flight pay amount and effort at work. Higher flight pay is one tool to make the overall compensation higher in an attempt to keep guys from jumping to the airlines, that’s all it does. Rand took a massive swing and a miss on this one. 

They didn’t consider military compensation in the context of folks’ overall compensation.

If they had, RAND would realize that (in the case of AvIP) most folks are making an economically irrational decision to show up at all.

Again, every A1 at every level should have a permanent labor economist on staff… but we’d probably pay just enough to find the worst ones. 

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, FLEA said:

How the does any person with a general sense of reason and logic come to the bolded conclusion? "If we pay them more they will work less, so don't pay them more!" WTF? 

IF the incentive pay were the primary source of income AND human beings were rational actors, this would be a reasonable conclusion. Meet the min, get the pay, do other stuff… but very few are paying the gas bill with special pay from the RC. 
 

BUT human beings are not always rational actors, especially military members who are specifically excluded from most income/compensation studies for exactly that reason. Turns out patriotism/flying with the boys/guilt have a dollar value… that the military insists is a magic power rather than a form of compensation.

 

Edited by jice
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A silver lining might be the fact that the DoD had to prove it would be "detrimental to the force" to justify not paying the full amount.  RAND also hedged their answer by admitting that the increase in flight pay would increase the number of people wanting to join the guard/reserve.  So according to them, individual participation would decrease but recruiting/retention numbers would increase.

The language in the NDAA has bipartisan support so probably just my bias coming out but I don't think this report is the smoking gun the DoD I'm sure was hoping for but still frustrating from our perspective.  I honestly don't get the level of effort the AF/DoD puts into NOT paying us...

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, jice said:

They didn’t consider military compensation in the context of folks’ overall compensation.

If they had, RAND would realize that (in the case of AvIP) most folks are making an economically irrational decision to show up at all.

Again, every A1 at every level should have a permanent labor economist on staff… but we’d probably pay just enough to find the worst ones. 

This is what I'm getting at. Just landed my first post-AD role. It is NOT airlines and I'm still making just about double what I was as a Major. The crazy high pay accessible to officers in the private sector is incredible and the DoD is shooting itself by not doing studies to understand just how much more opportunity people have when they get out. Yes, serving your country is a moral reason to stay but ensuring generational financial security for your family and off spring is also a moral reason to leave. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Danger41 said:

Is this the 1500 a month maxed out flight pay discussion for Reserve component (is that RC)? Any discussions on this for AD?

I think it’s specifically the idea that if you work even one day of orders, or just come to drill, that you would be entitled to the entire month’s worth of flight pay, per the normal brackets for what that pays. So come to drill, earn $1K in flight pay, not 4/30ths of $1K.

Edited by nsplayr
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, nsplayr said:

I think it’s specifically the idea that if you work even one day of orders, or just come to drill, that you would be entitled to the entire month’s worth of flight pay, per the normal brackets for what that pays. So come to drill, earn $1K in flight pay, not 4/30ths of $1K.

Does the NDAA change the concept of prorated incentive pay to one day = full payment?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, brabus said:

Does the NDAA change the concept of prorated incentive pay to one day = full payment?

AFAIK yes, and it was the 2021 NDAA, not even the 2022 one. The DoD has slowrolled a required report the law states was needed before the pay started, and in effect has indefinitely delayed actually implementing the law as written. Members of Congress from both parties are pissed and trying to get it fixed apparently.

https://www.military.com/daily-news/2022/10/26/delay-incentive-pay-boost-guard-and-reserves-draws-rebuke-lawmakers.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/21/2023 at 12:37 PM, Scooter14 said:

 


Who says you can’t have both?

Do your 11-12 years AD.

Join ARC unit.

Get hired by airline.

Drill with unit, go on a deployment or two, sit alert. Upgrade. Go to in residence PME. Whatever to mitigate first year pay and get orders. MEST, whatever.

Fly the line for year two at the airline. Continue to chip away at AD time until you’re close to or over the 15 year AD mark.

Seek out a temp AGR or ADOS tour. Flying, non-flying. Doesn’t matter. There’s a lot out there, especially if you’re willing to move. There’s probably a need at your own unit the way things are going now. If you’re willing to work and you have the qualifications they are willing to give you the chance.

Get to 20 active. It’ll probably take you 25 years of total service to make it happen. Go back to year 6-9 pay at your airline with an AD retirement safety net for the next economic downturn.







Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

 

FWIW this is pretty much exactly what I did.  Wish I could say I actually had the forethought to plan it that way.  It you can pull it off it works great. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/8/2023 at 10:52 AM, Danger41 said:

Is this the 1500 a month maxed out flight pay discussion for Reserve component (is that RC)? Any discussions on this for AD?

Here is the verbiage from the recently signed FY23 NDAA:

(c) SPECIAL AVIATION INCENTIVE PAY AND BONUS AUTHORITIES FOR OFFICERS.—Section 334(c)(1) of title 37, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘$1,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,500’’; and (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘$35,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$75,000’’. (d) SKILL INCENTIVE PAY OR PROFICIENCY BONUS.—Section 353(c)(1)(A) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘$1,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,750’’. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, HeyWatchThis said:

Here is the verbiage from the recently signed FY23 NDAA:

(c) SPECIAL AVIATION INCENTIVE PAY AND BONUS AUTHORITIES FOR OFFICERS.—Section 334(c)(1) of title 37, United States Code, is amended— (1) in subparagraph (A), by striking ‘‘$1,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,500’’; and (2) in subparagraph (B), by striking ‘‘$35,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$75,000’’. (d) SKILL INCENTIVE PAY OR PROFICIENCY BONUS.—Section 353(c)(1)(A) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking ‘‘$1,000’’ and inserting ‘‘$1,750’’. 

Wondering how long it'll take the Air Force to approve the maximum of $1,500 for AD.  From a little digging, it looks like it took a while last time an increase was authorized.  2015 NDAA allowed $1k max, AF didn't pay up until Oct 2017.  

 

https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/1290397/air-force-announces-initiatives-to-lessen-pilot-shortage/

https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/senate-bill/1356/text

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/22/2023 at 10:43 AM, SocialD said:

 

This has been a pretty common misconception by many of my squadron mates.  The only ones who come back on orders, are the guys who are within 5 years of their 20.  The rest have gotten a taste of the QOL and are now DSGs for life.  It's funny is seeing the "I'm never going to the airline" types, especially the ones who gave airline guys shit, who are now DSG for life because of how good the QOL is for them.

 

Unfortunately, I had to go on orders in early December and I forgot how bad being full time sucks.  I've worked more in the last two months than I did in the last 5 months of 2022 at Delta...never mind the massive pay hit.  I guess if all I did was show up, fly and go home, it wouldn't be terrible.  But I don't think people realize how much of life in the military is fighting one self-imposed (by the AF) roadblock after another.  It's completely maddening and what makes me dread getting up and going to work almost every day right now.  It's something you don't grasp until you have a job where all you have to do is fly and you're not constantly fighting just to get basic shit done.  Then the huge added benefit is that you don't take work home with you!  The end of these orders can't get here fast enough!

 

 

 

I'm nothing close to a weapons officer, but "it depends..."  My recommendation to all our young guys is that if you even think you may to the airlines at some point, I'd get hired ASAP because seniority is everything.  If you're within 5 years of a 20 year retirement, depending on how far you'll go for orders, then I'd imagine it wouldn't be all that hard to get to 20 while out on MLOA.  Lots of orders floating around the system...ask Brabus

I’m assuming you’re on a wb living in base?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Polar Bear said:

I’m assuming you’re on a wb living in base?

I say his statement is applicable to everyone, including the NB commuter (like me, for example). Of course I’d love to have the additional benefits of living in base, but even a NB commuter lives a life far exceeding the mil life in several ways (namely compensation and QOL). If one doesn’t find that true, then they’re either doing it wrong or very junior (probably both). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...