Jump to content

Aviation Continuation Pay (ACP - The Bonus)


Toro

Recommended Posts


I was down range with some Marine fighter guys and I started complaining about the USAF pilot issues. Once they told me about Marine flying I felt bad for complaining in the first place. Not sure how/why they put up with it.


Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums


I had the same experience. My opinion only, but the marine aviators had more pride in their service. I'm staying at a marine corps installation right now. The small differences are very noticeable.

For instance- I called the gym on a Sunday just to see if they were open (AF gyms are usually closed on weekends unless you fill out this stupid form to gain entry with your CAC), and the very polite attendant was apologetic when she said "sir, I'm sorry to inform you that on sundays we are only open from 0500 to 2300". So I got to the gym on a Sunday, and it was packed with the corps' weapon systems training to be hard to kill.

Compare that with any silly AF gym and the gaggles of people on "profile" for shin splints.

Just one of many differences. I won't derail this thread with a discussion on the differences in officer/enlisted relations.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It might be because aviation is such a small part of the Marine Corps, but I'm fairly certain it's just as bad, if not worse. At least for the fighter community - I can't really speak to the others. USMC F/A-18 squadrons are at, or just slightly below 50% required manning at the Captain level, and the vast majority, i.e., 80% of the Capts I know, are planning on leaving after their commitment is complete.


Why is that? Everyone is happier on AW ;)

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, caseylf said:

 

 


Why is that? Everyone is happier on AW ;)

Sent from my Moto G (4) using Tapatalk
 

 

They're just happy to be off the boat with a reliable internet connection.

Link to comment
Share on other sites


http://federalnewsradio.com/air-force/2017/03/air-force-meeting-airlines-pilot-shortage-may/

Home » Defense » Air Force » UPDATED: Air Force meeting…
EXCLUSIVE
UPDATED: Air Force meeting with airlines on pilot shortage in May

By Scott Maucione | @smaucioneWFED
March 27, 2017 3:04 pm
5 min read
The Air Force is preparing to meet with commercial flight companies in hopes it can find a way to stop the bleeding of experienced pilots leaving the force.

“Our senior leaders are going to start collaborating with the airlines in May to see if we can get a public private partnership and what that might look like, so I think that’s where you’ll see we are going,” Lt. Gen. Gina Grosso, the Air Force deputy chief of staff for Manpower, Personnel and Services, told Federal News Radio.

During a March 29 House Armed Services Personnel Subcommittee hearing, Grosso said that the Air Force is exploring an intermission program that would allow pilots to fly certain seasons with an airline company and then come back to the Air Force.

Sponsored Content: Why Governance, Risk and Compliance is Everyone’s Business - Download the Executive Brief Today.

The program would give pilots seniority in the commercial airline world, while still filling much needed pilot spots in the military service.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We are also starting to look at [allowing] aviators to fly part time on their on their own. I think those are just two ideas, and there are many more,” Grosso said.

Grosso said the partnership would look for a “win-win” situation for both the airlines and the Air Force.

“How can we get stability for defending and protecting the United States and how can [the airlines] get stability in having a pipeline for their aviators? We think there are some possibilities there, especially when we look to our allies,” Grosso said. “Our allies have national airlines, so it makes it a little easier, but there are definitely some models out there that we are hoping that we can take advantage of.”

The Air Force alone is dealing with a shortage of more than 600 pilots. The service is having trouble competing with airlines that can pay pilots more. The trouble comes when pilots are up for reenlistment.

Military pilots have training and hours required to qualify to fly for the major airlines without having to work for smaller regional airlines first.

“Because major airlines work on a seniority system, the best opportunity for salary growth in the major airlines occurs for military pilots leaving after their initial service obligation,” a July 2016 RAND report stated. Another factor that is appealing to military pilots is the Federal Aviation Administration increased the mandatory retirement age for pilots from 60 to 65 in 2007, giving pilots longer to cash in on their talents.

The military services tried using reenlistment bonuses to keep pilots in the force, but their appeal is dropping.

The Navy saw a 3.7 percent drop in new retention bonus contracts in 2015, dropping from almost 59 percent to 55 percent, stated a 2016 report to Congress.

The Air Force is seeing even bigger declines. In 2013, 68 percent of eligible pilots signed on for incentive pay contracts with the Air Force. That number dropped to 59 percent in 2014 and further to 55 percent in 2015. Only 410 out of 745 pilots eligible for bonuses actually took them in 2015. Only 42 percent of pilots offered early bonus contracts took the bait.

That’s especially troubling when the Air Force estimates that the cost to train one F-22 fighter pilot, for example, is $12.5 million.

One reason the report states for the pilots’ lack of interest in bonuses is the size of the incentive pay. Pilots are allowed a maximum $25,000 bonus per year, a number that has not changed since 1999.

That incentive pay may have worked five or 10 years ago when commercial airlines weren’t paying as well, but the RAND study states commercial airline pay has rebounded to mid-1990s peak salaries of $200,000.

“We have no trouble recruiting pilots. We have more people who want to be pilots than we have spaces to train them. For us the issue is … we are not retaining enough,” Grosso said.

Grosso added that as pilots reach their 11th year in the service the Air Force needs to keep around 65 percent. Over the years, that number has slowly declined.

“We have gaps in the force and we are very, very concerned about this and our chief has called this a crisis,” Grosso said.

Grosso told Congress the new blended retirement system may provide less of an incentive for pilots to stay in the service for a full 20 years as well.

Part of the Air Force’s attempt to become more appealing to pilots involves bettering their quality of life.

“What we found in the past — and we’ve been through this before because airlines have hired before — is quality of service is as important as quality of life. And quality of service is making sure that you’re given the opportunity to be the best you can be in your design, in your chosen occupation. Pilots who don’t fly, maintainers who’s don’t maintain, controllers who don’t control, will walk. And there’s not enough money in the Treasury to keep them in if we don’t need to give them the resources to be the best they can be. In my mind, readiness and morale are inexplicably linked. Where we have high readiness, we tend to have high moral because they’re given the opportunities to compete. Where we have low readiness, we have our lowest morale,” Air Force Chief of Staff David Goldfein told the Senate Armed Services Committee last September.

To make up for that the Air Force reduced additional training and extra duties for airmen, so they can have more free time. The service is currently looking for additional areas to cut in order to better quality of life.

Rep. Martha McSally (R-Ariz.) suggested the military services try to contact pilots who left the service, but did not join an airline to see if they may be interested in flying again.

“Maybe they went to start a business of their own or tried some other ‘grass is always greener’ thing and now they are realizing they miss the camaraderie, they miss the mission … it’s challenging to try and find these people it’s challenging to find the experienced pilots that have left. Maybe they are two, three, five years out, it doesn’t matter. Retraining them with the experience they’ve had and bringing them back even for just one assignment is worth the investment,” McSally said.


Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.marinecorpstimes.com/articles/marines-to-offer-retention-bonuses-to-pilots-again

 

I'd almost be willing to bet it'll be $10,000/year or less.

For 6-7 hours a month? No thanks.

 

I'd be somewhat interested in the deal where you could fly for the airlines "for seasons... building seniority," like you posted Duck. But wouldnt that be similar to the Guard or Reserves?

Link to comment
Share on other sites


http://federalnewsradio.com/air-force/2017/03/air-force-meeting-airlines-pilot-shortage-may/

Home » Defense » Air Force » UPDATED: Air Force meeting…
EXCLUSIVE
UPDATED: Air Force meeting with airlines on pilot shortage in May

By Scott Maucione | @smaucioneWFED
March 27, 2017 3:04 pm
5 min read
The Air Force is preparing to meet with commercial flight companies in hopes it can find a way to stop the bleeding of experienced pilots leaving the force.

“Our senior leaders are going to start collaborating with the airlines in May to see if we can get a public private partnership and what that might look like, so I think that’s where you’ll see we are going,” Lt. Gen. Gina Grosso, the Air Force deputy chief of staff for Manpower, Personnel and Services, told Federal News Radio.

During a March 29 House Armed Services Personnel Subcommittee hearing, Grosso said that the Air Force is exploring an intermission program that would allow pilots to fly certain seasons with an airline company and then come back to the Air Force.

Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums


This is called the ANG and AFRC Gina.... Stop screwing the ARC by treating us like AD on the cheap and learn something from us. Give us more people and more funding. Give us more full-time AGR manning with a $35k+ bonus. Give our leaders REAL leadership positions. Stop trying to push us out of the picture while harping the "Total Force" bullshit... it's gotten old.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not an airline guy but once a commercial pilot and member of a union, putting on my working pilot cap...

what the shit would this "season" working thing look like?  would these guy just come in the "busy" season, work up to the legal limit a few months at a time?  how the hell does that fit into the PBS with their line numbers?  was a pilot rep at this "great" meeting?

i swear the af is hell bent on doing everything but admit they actually have a institutional problem and will look for any gd thing that looks like it can keep the shoe clerk machine lurching just a few more miles down the line...

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Duck said:


http://federalnewsradio.com/air-force/2017/03/air-force-meeting-airlines-pilot-shortage-may/

Home » Defense » Air Force » UPDATED: Air Force meeting…
EXCLUSIVE
UPDATED: Air Force meeting with airlines on pilot shortage in May

By Scott Maucione | @smaucioneWFED
March 27, 2017 3:04 pm
5 min read
The Air Force is preparing to meet with commercial flight companies in hopes it can find a way to stop the bleeding of experienced pilots leaving the force.

“Our senior leaders are going to start collaborating with the airlines in May to see if we can get a public private partnership and what that might look like, so I think that’s where you’ll see we are going,” Lt. Gen. Gina Grosso, the Air Force deputy chief of staff for Manpower, Personnel and Services, told Federal News Radio.

During a March 29 House Armed Services Personnel Subcommittee hearing, Grosso said that the Air Force is exploring an intermission program that would allow pilots to fly certain seasons with an airline company and then come back to the Air Force.

Sponsored Content: Why Governance, Risk and Compliance is Everyone’s Business - Download the Executive Brief Today.

The program would give pilots seniority in the commercial airline world, while still filling much needed pilot spots in the military service.

ADVERTISEMENT

“We are also starting to look at [allowing] aviators to fly part time on their on their own. I think those are just two ideas, and there are many more,” Grosso said.

Grosso said the partnership would look for a “win-win” situation for both the airlines and the Air Force.

“How can we get stability for defending and protecting the United States and how can [the airlines] get stability in having a pipeline for their aviators? We think there are some possibilities there, especially when we look to our allies,” Grosso said. “Our allies have national airlines, so it makes it a little easier, but there are definitely some models out there that we are hoping that we can take advantage of.”

The Air Force alone is dealing with a shortage of more than 600 pilots. The service is having trouble competing with airlines that can pay pilots more. The trouble comes when pilots are up for reenlistment.

Military pilots have training and hours required to qualify to fly for the major airlines without having to work for smaller regional airlines first.

“Because major airlines work on a seniority system, the best opportunity for salary growth in the major airlines occurs for military pilots leaving after their initial service obligation,” a July 2016 RAND report stated. Another factor that is appealing to military pilots is the Federal Aviation Administration increased the mandatory retirement age for pilots from 60 to 65 in 2007, giving pilots longer to cash in on their talents.

The military services tried using reenlistment bonuses to keep pilots in the force, but their appeal is dropping.

The Navy saw a 3.7 percent drop in new retention bonus contracts in 2015, dropping from almost 59 percent to 55 percent, stated a 2016 report to Congress.

The Air Force is seeing even bigger declines. In 2013, 68 percent of eligible pilots signed on for incentive pay contracts with the Air Force. That number dropped to 59 percent in 2014 and further to 55 percent in 2015. Only 410 out of 745 pilots eligible for bonuses actually took them in 2015. Only 42 percent of pilots offered early bonus contracts took the bait.

That’s especially troubling when the Air Force estimates that the cost to train one F-22 fighter pilot, for example, is $12.5 million.

One reason the report states for the pilots’ lack of interest in bonuses is the size of the incentive pay. Pilots are allowed a maximum $25,000 bonus per year, a number that has not changed since 1999.

That incentive pay may have worked five or 10 years ago when commercial airlines weren’t paying as well, but the RAND study states commercial airline pay has rebounded to mid-1990s peak salaries of $200,000.

“We have no trouble recruiting pilots. We have more people who want to be pilots than we have spaces to train them. For us the issue is … we are not retaining enough,” Grosso said.

Grosso added that as pilots reach their 11th year in the service the Air Force needs to keep around 65 percent. Over the years, that number has slowly declined.

“We have gaps in the force and we are very, very concerned about this and our chief has called this a crisis,” Grosso said.

Grosso told Congress the new blended retirement system may provide less of an incentive for pilots to stay in the service for a full 20 years as well.

Part of the Air Force’s attempt to become more appealing to pilots involves bettering their quality of life.

“What we found in the past — and we’ve been through this before because airlines have hired before — is quality of service is as important as quality of life. And quality of service is making sure that you’re given the opportunity to be the best you can be in your design, in your chosen occupation. Pilots who don’t fly, maintainers who’s don’t maintain, controllers who don’t control, will walk. And there’s not enough money in the Treasury to keep them in if we don’t need to give them the resources to be the best they can be. In my mind, readiness and morale are inexplicably linked. Where we have high readiness, we tend to have high moral because they’re given the opportunities to compete. Where we have low readiness, we have our lowest morale,” Air Force Chief of Staff David Goldfein told the Senate Armed Services Committee last September.

To make up for that the Air Force reduced additional training and extra duties for airmen, so they can have more free time. The service is currently looking for additional areas to cut in order to better quality of life.

Rep. Martha McSally (R-Ariz.) suggested the military services try to contact pilots who left the service, but did not join an airline to see if they may be interested in flying again.

“Maybe they went to start a business of their own or tried some other ‘grass is always greener’ thing and now they are realizing they miss the camaraderie, they miss the mission … it’s challenging to try and find these people it’s challenging to find the experienced pilots that have left. Maybe they are two, three, five years out, it doesn’t matter. Retraining them with the experience they’ve had and bringing them back even for just one assignment is worth the investment,” McSally said.


Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums

If I'm an airline CEO I'm just laughing at this. How would any of that above benefit them? They are REAPING the benefits of the Air Force losing pilots.  Why would they even come to the table to talk about stuff like this?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The airlines provided all the information to the AF leadership long ago, and Big Blue ignored it all. Even going so far as paying people to get out early, or telling the quitters to get out as they will be replaced. Now these brilliant ideals from the AF leadership are too little to late to truly solve the problems. It will most likely just negatively affect those close to the end of their commitment. This is kind of like watching a slow motion accident.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/17/2017 at 8:44 PM, the g-man said:

Can we re-visit the fact that the ACIP has not been revised since 1989?

$650 then is worth about double that now.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I'm on exchange with the RAF and I'm TDY, so, let's just say I've got the time to look this up. Straight from the 2017 NDAA:

SEC. 616. AVIATION INCENTIVE PAY AND BONUS MATTERS.

(a) MAXIMUM INCENTIVE PAY AND BONUS AMOUNTS.—Paragraph (1) of section 334(c) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting the following new subparagraphs:

‘‘(A) aviation incentive pay under subsection (a) shall be paid at a monthly rate not to exceed $1,000 per month; and

‘‘(B) an aviation bonus under subsection (b) may not exceed $35,000 for each 12-month period of obligated service agreed to under subsection (d).’’. 

 

Flight pay is going up too. 

If ya'll want me to post the NDAA too, holler at me.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Sprkt69 said:

The airlines provided all the information to the AF leadership long ago, and Big Blue ignored it all. Even going so far as paying people to get out early, or telling the quitters to get out as they will be replaced. Now these brilliant ideals from the AF leadership are too little to late to truly solve the problems. It will most likely just negatively affect those close to the end of their commitment. This is kind of like watching a slow motion accident.

I was one of those 11F's paid to get out, turns out the jokes on me.  DONT TAKE THE MONEY!  I will explain in a large wall of words soon.  And why don't you have an airline job yet??

Edited by matmacwc
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Duck said:

“We have no trouble recruiting pilots. We have more people who want to be pilots than we have spaces to train them. For us the issue is … we are not retaining enough,” Grosso said.

Grosso added that as pilots reach their 11th year in the service the Air Force needs to keep around 65 percent. Over the years, that number has slowly declined.

“We have gaps in the force and we are very, very concerned about this and our chief has called this a crisis,” Grosso said.

Grosso told Congress the new blended retirement system may provide less of an incentive for pilots to stay in the service for a full 20 years as well.

 

This is the BGen Grosso who, as the Director of Force Management and Policy at the Pentagon, certainly oversaw and endorsed all of the nonsensical force shaping that occurred under her watch.  Lots of manpower resources were paid well to leave.  Sad that she was promoted to MGen, then went on to be the Director of the USAF SAPR office, which produced another star.

Now as a LtGen she is back to clean up the mess she oversaw, which will certainly produce another star.

People like this in leadership positions combined with the complete lack of accountability for failed decisions and policies are at the heart of what is wrong with the USAF today.

  • Upvote 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Tone deaf said:

This is the BGen Grosso who, as the Director of Force Management and Policy at the Pentagon, certainly oversaw and endorsed all of the nonsensical force shaping that occurred under her watch.  Lots of manpower resources were paid well to leave.  Sad that she was promoted to MGen, then went on to be the Director of the USAF SAPR office, which produced another star.

Now as a LtGen she is back to clean up the mess she oversaw, which will certainly produce another star.

People like this in leadership positions combined with the complete lack of accountability for failed decisions and policies are at the heart of what is wrong with the USAF today.

It's been going on way longer than that - the track record goes back further than BGen. Much like another 3-button in the HAF hierarchy right now, there's sometimes decisions made based on demographics... if you catch my meaning. But they're not the only problem.

Dont worry (yet), there were far more qualified personnelists that didn't get a fourth star.

My prediction is we get laughed out of the meeting, but it won't be the gut check it needs to be. Had many interesting conversations about this lately, with people asking what they should tell their squadrons. There's only one answer: the truth, because anything else is bullshit and results in a further loss of credibility. Pilots have more opportunity and leverage than at any time I've seen in my short career in the service. If they walk, they win; if they stay, dice roll. Guys are turning down incredible opportunities to walk and go get a line number. So the service is going to have to get on its knees to keep people from walking, or stop loss and slit its own throat.

i wouldn't hold my breath for either,

Chuck

Edited by Chuck17
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, MetroF16 said:

I'm on exchange with the RAF and I'm TDY, so, let's just say I've got the time to look this up. Straight from the 2017 NDAA:

SEC. 616. AVIATION INCENTIVE PAY AND BONUS MATTERS.

(a) MAXIMUM INCENTIVE PAY AND BONUS AMOUNTS.—Paragraph (1) of section 334(c) of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting the following new subparagraphs:

‘‘(A) aviation incentive pay under subsection (a) shall be paid at a monthly rate not to exceed $1,000 per month; and

‘‘(B) an aviation bonus under subsection (b) may not exceed $35,000 for each 12-month period of obligated service agreed to under subsection (d).’’. 

 

Flight pay is going up too. 

If ya'll want me to post the NDAA too, holler at me.

The NDAA authorized flight pay to go up.  So far, no sign that the Air Force is actually going to increase it.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The NDAA authorized flight pay to go up.  So far, no sign that the Air Force is actually going to increase it.

The AF strategy is to retain people at the 12 year point, when in actuality they need to start retaining people at the 2 year point. It's too late to try and make people change their minds when you have beat them for 10 years.


Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums
  • Upvote 20
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm on exchange with the RAF and I'm TDY, so, let's just say I've got the time to look this up. Straight from the 2017 NDAA:
SEC. 616. AVIATION INCENTIVE PAY AND BONUS MATTERS.
(a) MAXIMUM INCENTIVE PAY AND BONUS AMOUNTS.—Paragraph (1) of section 334© of title 37, United States Code, is amended by striking subparagraphs (A) and (B) and inserting the following new subparagraphs:
‘‘(A) aviation incentive pay under subsection (a) shall be paid at a monthly rate not to exceed $1,000 per month; and
‘‘(B) an aviation bonus under subsection (b) may not exceed $35,000 for each 12-month period of obligated service agreed to under subsection (d).’’. 
 
Flight pay is going up too. 
If ya'll want me to post the NDAA too, holler at me.

Where have you seen anything pointing to an actual increases in AIP? Keep in mind $1k max....assuming they apply that to the already $840 per month pilots, I'm betting the other lower tiers get a $69 increase which is sh-t in the scheme of things vs inflation.






Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites


The AF strategy is to retain people at the 12 year point, when in actuality they need to start retaining people at the 2 year point. It's too late to try and make people change their minds when you have beat them for 10 years.


Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums


Exactly, but the Air Force has relied on FNG's coming out of UPT with a boner to fly something that burns Jet A++ (almost typed JP8) and make a lot of noise. It's usually your 6-8 yr Captains and young Majors who've been around the flag pole enough times to say, "F$ck this shit. I'm going to the airlines.".

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Chuck17 said:

Pilots have more opportunity and leverage than at any time I've seen in my short career in the service. If they walk, they win; if they stay, dice roll. Guys are turning down incredible opportunities to walk and go get a line number. 

Valid.  For those on the fence as I was a few years ago: I took the money because I weighed the pros and cons of my first decade and decided I wanted more of what I'd done.  However, they sent me to school and staff with no return path to the fight.  Basically, I rolled the dice and lost.  For now.  If I could do it over, fully grasping that AD ultimately is a dice roll no matter your strats or checked boxes, I probably would still roll.     

Maybe you'll get lucky and land a cool job if you stay AD.  Maybe your timing is good. But if you're a fence-sitter don't be deceived into thinking there is a "plan" other than feed human flesh into the assignment grinder and spread it wherever seems good at the moment to whoever happens to be spreading that day.  Buyer beware; stay long enough and you'll roll snake eyes.  On the other hand, if you have a combat itch that can only be scratched in AD, roll those dice and good luck to you!

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Gazmo said:

 


Exactly, but the Air Force has relied on FNG's coming out of UPT with a boner to fly something that burns Jet A++ (almost typed JP8) and make a lot of noise. It's usually your 6-8 yr Captains and young Majors who've been around the flag pole enough times to say, "F$ck this shit. I'm going to the airlines.".

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
 

 

Exactly my point. They expect the honeymoon phase to last a full 10 years while beating their wife with 6 month non flying deployments, 365s and telling people who can't leave that they should leave if they don't like it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, tac airlifter said:

Valid.  For those on the fence as I was a few years ago: I took the money because I weighed the pros and cons of my first decade and decided I wanted more of what I'd done.  However, they sent me to school and staff with no return path to the fight.  Basically, I rolled the dice and lost.  For now.  If I could do it over, fully grasping that AD ultimately is a dice roll no matter your strats or checked boxes, I probably would still roll.     

Maybe you'll get lucky and land a cool job if you stay AD.  Maybe your timing is good. But if you're a fence-sitter don't be deceived into thinking there is a "plan" other than feed human flesh into the assignment grinder and spread it wherever seems good at the moment to whoever happens to be spreading that day.  Buyer beware; stay long enough and you'll roll snake eyes.  On the other hand, if you have a combat itch that can only be scratched in AD, roll those dice and good luck to you!

Don't kid yourself, the Guard and Reserves see plenty of combat too and are arguably the best option for fence sitters. All the mil flying without the AD BS and getting your line number is still an option. If you want to break out your golden knee pads and be somebody, there is that option too. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Sprkt69 said:

Don't kid yourself, the Guard and Reserves see plenty of combat too and are arguably the best option for fence sitters. All the mil flying without the AD BS and getting your line number is still an option. If you want to break out your golden knee pads and be somebody, there is that option too. 

Ok?

WRT guard/reserve: in my platform, they don't.  So that world wasn't part of my calculus.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Don't kid yourself, the Guard and Reserves see plenty of combat too and are arguably the best option for fence sitters. All the mil flying without the AD BS and getting your line number is still an option. If you want to break out your golden knee pads and be somebody, there is that option too. 

Except for tfi units. They bow down to AD. They don't realize AD needs to treat guard/res good or else dudes leave the next day.


Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...