Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Complete and utter malarkey. ONE mainstream network went after Obama, Foxnews, some of it unwarranted Political tripe, some of it valid.  Meanwhile ALL of the remaining mainstream networks suppor

Want to slash American carbon?  Build nuclear power plants.  

When MSNBC announced Trump's win in Iowa, there was an audible grunt from Rachel Madow. By the sound of it, she apparently sat on her sack wrong. Happens to the best of us.

Posted Images

On 2/17/2019 at 6:24 PM, Seadogs said:

If a leftist NBC says illegal immigration costs the U.S. $54 billion per year and Trump is asking about $5 billion for a wall, I don't think you can make an economic argument against the wall being a "waste of money and resources". 

The $5B isn't for the entire wall. It's for about 215 miles of wall. There's just under 2000 miles of border between Mexico and the U.S. 

 

It amazes me that people believe the $5B he asked for was for the entire wall. It's not even close.

  • Downvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, brickhistory said:

No Jussie Smollet talk?  Odd.

No Steven Hatfield talk?  Odd.

No Samantha Powers talk?  Odd.

No Chicago corruption talk even for something as simple as a library?  Odd.

https://www.chicagotribune.com/news/obamacenter/ct-met-obama-presidential-library-chicago-lawsuit-20190214-story.html

I was unaware these people were all Presidents of the United States... Since the topic of this thread is, ya know, "The Next President is..."

  • Downvote 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
I was unaware these people were all Presidents of the United States... Since the topic of this thread is, ya know, "The Next President is..."


Oh I don’t know. Seemed the “This Is MAGA country” attack and selective outrage by his critics was pretty relatable to the President... Until it turned out to be complete BS and those same people are walking back the narrative.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Vertigo said:

The $5B isn't for the entire wall. It's for about 215 miles of wall. There's just under 2000 miles of border between Mexico and the U.S. 

 

It amazes me that people believe the $5B he asked for was for the entire wall. It's not even close.

Cool, 👍 so the whole wall will be $50 billion. To curtail the amount that illegal immigration costs, I think that is reasonable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Vertigo said:

I was unaware these people were all Presidents of the United States... Since the topic of this thread is, ya know, "The Next President is..."

I was unaware that Roger Stone was the President of the United States.  Must have missed that...

But, please, can you continue the brilliant intellectual discussion of how walls are really not necessary.  I've got some stock in Home Depot that I might want to shed if your premise is valid.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • 2 weeks later...
  • 2 weeks later...

I’ve never seen so many demo’s rushing to defend military spending, part of me wishes that was his intent, cause he definitely got a bunch of commercials and quotes for 2020.  Might be an epic troll, might be giving him too much credit, either way, I don’t think military spending will be cut anytime soon.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Mueller Report delivered; no further indictments (and just to remind, the ones handed out were for unrelated and/or fibbing to the FBI, not "muh Russia" charges) to be filed.  Will be interesting to see what the thing actually says so it's too early for a "wah, wah" yet.

 

Little reported in 'Merica is Ukraine has opened an investigation in the Ukrainian government trying to interfere in the US election for Hillary.  To include some shenanigans from her State Department and those suspected bits of the Ukrainian government.

Still, at least it doesn't involve uranium...

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
40 minutes ago, brickhistory said:

Mueller Report delivered; no further indictments (and just to remind, the ones handed out were for unrelated and/or fibbing to the FBI, not "muh Russia" charges) to be filed.  Will be interesting to see what the thing actually says so it's too early for a "wah, wah" yet.

 

Little reported in 'Merica is Ukraine has opened an investigation in the Ukrainian government trying to interfere in the US election for Hillary.  To include some shenanigans from her State Department and those suspected bits of the Ukrainian government.

Still, at least it doesn't involve uranium...

Got it from a birdie

https://www.scribd.com/document/402800029/Report-from-the-Special-Counsel-Investigation-into-Russian-Interference-During-and-Before-the-2016-Presidential-Election?fbclid=IwAR1XxltpbI9NWDXurIeW69-cOun1tVGQjR-WC9ct_9DjYxOUHzKcgyxc75A

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
12 hours ago, brickhistory said:

 

Little reported in 'Merica is Ukraine has opened an investigation in the Ukrainian government trying to interfere in the US election for Hillary.  To include some shenanigans from her State Department and those suspected bits of the Ukrainian government.

Still, at least it doesn't involve uranium...

  Demos got all hot and bothered with the 2016 election then lost their minds when H lost.  I’ve seen the same emotion over the last 2 years in regards to this report, if it is what I think it is, they gonna lose their minds again.  I think certain news media outlets whip up these emotions and when they move on, approximately 65 million Americans cannot.  I've been warning my liberal friends since this started, they don't listen, crow taste horrible, ask how I know.

I think it will be interesting to see how broad or narrow his scope, and if H, Comey or any other Demo shows up negatively in the report.  It could totally backfire wanting public release.  Then again, it's Washington, they probably all know what's in it.u

Legally, they don’t have to release much, we are hearing from both sides to realease the whole thing.  Whoever postures to keep it hidden first, will be really telling.

Edited by matmacwc
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, matmacwc said:

  

I think it will be interesting to see how broad or narrow his scope, and if H, Comey or any other Demo shows up negatively in the report.  It could totally backfire wanting public release.  Then again, it's Washington, they probably all know what's in it.u

 

https://lawandcrime.com/high-profile/obamas-former-white-house-counsel-lawyers-up-after-mueller-probe-referral/

Link to post
Share on other sites
On 3/22/2019 at 5:51 PM, brickhistory said:

Mueller Report delivered; no further indictments (and just to remind, the ones handed out were for unrelated and/or fibbing to the FBI, not "muh Russia" charges) to be filed.  Will be interesting to see what the thing actually says so it's too early for a "wah, wah" yet.

Huh?

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/read-muellers-full-indictment-against-12-russian-officers-for-election-interference

Pretty sure most of the people on that indictment didn’t talk to Mueller’s Special Counsel or are in the U.S.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's not pointing out what's been done, but what's expected, and specifically, what Obamas people expect.  It make more sense if the date on the article was in the last few weeks vs. 6 months ago.

Edited by matmacwc
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, matmacwc said:

He's not pointing out what's been done, but what's expected, and specifically, what Obamas people expect.  It make more sense if the date on the article was in the last few weeks vs. 6 months ago.

A lot of it is grand standing. It’s still gray area if a president can pardon himself while in office. And as most everyone knows the president has wide discretion to issue a pardon to whoever he wants. Which is really the catalyst why the NY AG/DA indicted Manafort and possibly more of Trump’s family knowing he has no pardon jurisdiction in state proceedings.

I expect the Mueller Report to blow up in the face of the Dems much like the pitchfork raising Republicans had the Starr Report/Impeachment blow up in theirs, specifically Newt Gingrich in the 90’s.

If it does, it’ll be a landslide re-election of Trump for another four years.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...