Jump to content

The Next President is...


disgruntledemployee

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, pawnman said:

At least Georgia.  But hell, if the dems have the resources to manipulate votes in ONLY tight races...why not Iowa, Maine, Montana, and South Carolina?

They only had to take one additional seat to take control of the Senate.  And yet somehow, with all the "widespread" fraud for president...they weren't able to flip one seat?

Did you happen to look up the results for the states you listed?

It seems like you're suggesting 10% is a "tight" race.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, torqued said:

Did you happen to look up the results for the states you listed?

It seems like you're suggesting 10% is a "tight" race.

Did you happen to look up the numbers for Pennsylvania mail in votes?

It seems like you didn't because you replied by saying it's a "math problem" with no explanation.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DosXX said:

Did you happen to look up the numbers for Pennsylvania mail in votes?

It seems like you didn't because you replied by saying it's a "math problem" with no explanation.

You want a math problem? 😆

What is 300,000 COVID deaths minus 200,000 COVID deaths? Think you can wrap your head around that one, Capt Calculator?

  • Downvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, torqued said:

You want a math problem? 😆

What is 300,000 COVID deaths minus 200,000 COVID deaths? Think you can wrap your head around that one, Capt Calculator?

You get the award for most cringe deflection 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Write up by the guy who wrote the spiderfoot tool that was so widely hailed as "proof" from the failed Trump Campaign.  Guess if he agrees more with COL Cybersecurity Expert, or your lowely, local cyber guy.

https://medium.com/@micallst/misusing-osint-to-claim-election-fraud-cfb89c858c3a

Relevant quote -
 

Quote

"Assuming the author of the affidavit was not intentionally misleading, the affidavit demonstrates a number of knowledge gaps that manifest in the other pitfalls laid out below. Had this fundamental knowledge been present in the author of the affidavit, I doubt it would have ever been written."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, FLEA said:

Ok to be fair, this is sort of a dumb question. If you were going to invest in fraud as a democrat, why would you waste you money on California or New York? You are obviously going to target swing states. 

Furthermore, if you were going to investigate fraud as a Republican, why would you do it in Ohio? A state you won. 

 

You're right I probably wouldn't invest in fraud in New York and Cali.. but I certainly would in Texas and Florida. Both of which trump won narrowly, and since he won, their vote counts were of course super duper perfect and secure. 
 

It sounds stupid because it is stupid. This is my whole point. If you, a sitting president with any integrity whatsoever, were concerned about widespread fraud and our overall election tampering, you would be investigating it everywhere.
 

Crying fraud only in the states where you narrowly lost looks an awful lot like slinging poop and hoping some of it sticks.  And maybe it looks like that because that's exactly what it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Pooter said:

You're right I probably wouldn't invest in fraud in New York and Cali.. but I certainly would in Texas and Florida. Both of which trump won narrowly, and since he won, their vote counts were of course super duper perfect and secure. 
 

It sounds stupid because it is stupid. This is my whole point. If you, a sitting president with any integrity whatsoever, were concerned about widespread fraud and our overall election tampering, you would be investigating it everywhere.
 

Crying fraud only in the states where you narrowly lost looks an awful lot like slinging poop and hoping some of it sticks.  And maybe it looks like that because that's exactly what it is. 

Would you say POTUS was behaving more like this hippo or this gorilla? 

https://tenor.com/view/hippopotamus-hippo-poop-rapid-pooping-gif-16021276image.png

https://tenor.com/view/angry-poop-monkey-throw-mad-gif-17790027image.png

Edited by bfargin
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, pawnman said:

I wonder how many people in Trump's circle have to say it before Trump supporters believe it.

Barr will probably just be the next one in the administration to get canned like the last trump nominee who said the election was generally secure. You know.. as part of the completely normal administration turnover. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, pawnman said:

I wonder how many people in Trump's circle have to say it before Trump supporters believe it.

No reason to disbelieve Barr. Headline is misleading though, left out the "so far" part. The flipside to this is the Dems and MSM have been calling him Trumps personal hack lawyer for well over a year. Now that he said something they can grab on to, he's got credibility?  Politics as usual. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, arg said:

No reason to disbelieve Barr. Headline is misleading though, left out the "so far" part. The flipside to this is the Dems and MSM have been calling him Trumps personal hack lawyer for well over a year. Now that he said something they can grab on to, he's got credibility?  Politics as usual. 

Are you joking?  He doesn't have any credibility, he simply demonstrates how everyone but Trump gets it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You know, you can still be a Trump supporter while also realizing he lost the election due to being very unpopular.

But at some point, you’ll have to let it go. Trump himself will be working “the election was rigged” quibbles into every conversation he has for the rest of his life. Don’t lump yourself into that boat.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, torqued said:

You want a math problem? 😆

What is 300,000 COVID deaths minus 200,000 COVID deaths? Think you can wrap your head around that one, Capt Calculator?

I think you thought this was me lol. By the way, on the order of magnitude means something.

You're kinda goin off the rails, man.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Negatory said:

I think you thought this was me lol. By the way, on the order of magnitude means something.

You're kinda goin off the rails, man.

Ah, shit. LOL. My fault. I got you and DosXX confused. You have the same positions. DosXX, my apologies. Negatory, I meant to insult you with that post. 😆

And I agree. These issues are somewhat important to me, but not enough to make permanent online enemies. I don’t want to go any further down that path. We’re only disagreeing on one or two issues. We’re not solving anything here.  I’m going to try and keep that in perspective.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So, this had to be a thing - https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/12/01/no-kraken-refer-military-intelligence-unit.hmtl

Quote

A retired Air Force three-star general reignited baseless conspiratorial claims about U.S. troops' involvement in clandestine missions in the wake of the presidential election -- claims an Army official said are 100% false.

Also, Flynn (whose twitter handle is @genflynn...douche) is endorsing:

Quote

...declare a limited form of Martial Law, and temporarily suspend the Constitution and civilian control of these federal elections, for the sole purpose of having the military oversee a national re-vote.

So...yea.

Edited by 17D_guy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...