Jump to content

The Next President is...


disgruntledemployee

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, Lord Ratner said:

Yeah that's social monogamy, though, right? I'm not sure what biological monogamy means. Even within those species there are instances of non-monogamy, so it isn't "biological."

I used biological monogamy to mean sexual monogamy. Science recognizes three forms of monogamy. Social, sexual and genetic. What most people identify as human monogamy is sexual monogamy where it is actually social monogamy. Sexual monogamy is the pairing of mates for life and is found in nature but humans don't fit the bill.  The biggest evidence of this is the preponderance of adultery in society. If we were sexually monogamous this wouldn't be a common behavior. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jrizzell said:

I think we can all agree after watching those interviews that Harris is just remarkably unlikable. Her fake smiling laughter “tick” is odd and off-putting.

She’s a typical arrogant, smug California liberal.  Hasn’t accomplished anything besides blow married men to get hired and put black people behind bars for drug offenses she herself bragged about.  However, that fake laughter ? Not sure anyone sane could deal with that for 4-8 years. Yikes. 

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dream big said:

She’s a typical arrogant, smug California liberal.  Hasn’t accomplished anything besides blow married men to get hired and put black people behind bars for drug offenses she herself bragged about.  However, that fake laughter ? Not sure anyone sane could deal with that for 4-8 years. Yikes. 

You could just have said "typical Californian"

(From a guy suffering life in the Bay Area)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone taking bets on how long Biden will last before Harris takes over if they win?

He’ll serve 12 months; then have the “courage” to step down while his family deals with his newly diagnosed cognitive decline issues. Or they keep his body at the helm, and try and run the country behind the scenes like Cheney did...Either scenario, the most liberal US Senator will be POTUS sooner, rather than never.
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Guardian said:


Synopsis?


I just watched the unedited 60 minutes after watching the actual 60 minutes. Holy crap. What a hit piece 60 minutes did. Man. Amazing liberal editing job. They even had to know the full video was out and they still went out and published their edited junk.

And wow. Biden and K just seething with bold face lies. Never seen anything like it. It was bold in your face flat out lying. With evidence to the contrary already out in public. No fact checking needed. It was as if they were asked what is the most untrue ridiculous way you can answer this. And if K didn’t know the answer, she just awkwardly laughed. Which is her equivalent to Biden’s “come on man”. I’ve never been more sure of who I was voting for then after seeing those two liars tonight.

 

15 hours ago, 17D_guy said:

I wonder if this is one of those things where I'd watch it and come to a completely different interpretation.

It basically lays out all the events that unfolded just prior to and after the 2016 election.  Honestly, I've never been able to put the Steele Dossier, "Russia Gate", General Flynn, Carter Page, Devin Nunes issues into a coherent story.

It's a series of interviews from Trump admin and transition team, DOJ, DIA, CIA, and FBI whistleblowers.

The video presents the entire chain of events and backstories in a way that gives you the nearly complete picture of what happened. Reading the description, I thought it might be a selectively edited and highly spun right-wing propaganda video. Of course, there is a bias, but it seems to be supported by fact after fact after fact. Everything makes sense.

You may watch it and come to a different conclusion, but it'll definitely give you info you didn't have before and make you think little harder about what's going on. If you do find fault in it, I'd be interested to hear it in case I'm being naive.

 

Edited by torqued
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, TreeA10 said:

Anyone taking bets on how long Biden will last before Harris takes over if they win?

There is something going on this week. The media is dialing back rhetoric a little, Biden and Harris aren't campaigning like they should be.

This laptop is un-fucking-believable. Aside from all the Hunter Biden porn on the Gtv.org website, it is said there are tens of thousands of incriminating texts and emails implicating Joe. They are very slowly being released. The Dems are over a barrel. It is starting to seem like they know they have to lose this round. If they don't lose, the revelations will destroy the Presidency and the Party.

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2020/10/forget_the_hunter_biden_sex_tapes_the_real_news_is_much_bigger_than_that.html

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ThreeHoler said:

That story sure seems legit...


Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app

I know, it's not top shelf. But where do you go when nothing is legit? I think we can ignore the details and the unsubstantiated inferences. But there is basic info.

The laptop exists, and the people who have seen it said it contains the Hunter Biden porn/illegal activities as well as compromising financial/corruption information about Joe.

If Chinese-dissident billionaire Guo and Bannon have the contents and release proof of the Hunter claims, it stands to reason that incriminating financial information also exists. If it exists, it is most certainly being used as leverage behind the scenes. Once its out there, it's no longer useful.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know, it's not top shelf. But where do you go when nothing is legit? I think we can ignore the details and the unsubstantiated inferences. But there is basic info.
The laptop exists, and the people who have seen it said it contains the Hunter Biden porn/illegal activities as well as compromising financial/corruption information about Joe.
If Chinese-dissident billionaire Guo and Bannon have the contents and release proof of the Hunter claims, it stands to reason that incriminating financial information also exists. If it exists, it is most certainly being used as leverage behind the scenes. Once its out there, it's no longer useful.
 

So I'm just curious, what happens when the election comes and goes and no one ever substantiates any of this stuff? Not saying that will happen, but I think we can all agree this, or any administration in recent history isn't necessarily trustworthy. We're a week out, and everyone with all this proof, except for the super reputable sources quoted by torqued, are mum.

And who knows, maybe they're going to drop all these bombshells. At this point, nothing is surprising...

What are all of you die-hard Trumpeters going to say? Wait, I know, you'll say #fakenews...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Guardian said:

I just watched the unedited 60 minutes after watching the actual 60 minutes. Holy crap. What a hit piece 60 minutes did. Man. Amazing liberal editing job. They even had to know the full video was out and they still went out and published their edited junk.

And wow. Biden and K just seething with bold face lies. Never seen anything like it. It was bold in your face flat out lying. With evidence to the contrary already out in public. No fact checking needed. It was as if they were asked what is the most untrue ridiculous way you can answer this. And if K didn’t know the answer, she just awkwardly laughed. Which is her equivalent to Biden’s “come on man”. I’ve never been more sure of who I was voting for then after seeing those two liars tonight.

Let me get this straight.  You're turned off by people lying to your face and simultaneously you're sure that your vote is going to a person who, if they played a character in a Hollywood movie meant to be a pathological liar, you'd complain that their rendition was too cartoonish and over-the-top?  Welp, I guess you've got that all sewn up.

Edited by Mark1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, Guardian said:


Synopsis?


I just watched the unedited 60 minutes after watching the actual 60 minutes. Holy crap. What a hit piece 60 minutes did. Man. Amazing liberal editing job. They even had to know the full video was out and they still went out and published their edited junk.

And wow. Biden and K just seething with bold face lies. Never seen anything like it. It was bold in your face flat out lying. With evidence to the contrary already out in public. No fact checking needed. It was as if they were asked what is the most untrue ridiculous way you can answer this. And if K didn’t know the answer, she just awkwardly laughed. Which is her equivalent to Biden’s “come on man”. I’ve never been more sure of who I was voting for then after seeing those two liars tonight.

Do you have links or are they both on Amazon?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, slackline said:


So I'm just curious, what happens when the election comes and goes and no one ever substantiates any of this stuff? Not saying that will happen, but I think we can all agree this, or any administration in recent history isn't necessarily trustworthy. We're a week out, and everyone with all this proof, except for the super reputable sources quoted by torqued, are mum.

And who knows, maybe they're going to drop all these bombshells. At this point, nothing is surprising...

What are all of you die-hard Trumpeters going to say? Wait, I know, you'll say #fakenews...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fuck that, if they don't put it out, it doesn't exist.

 

So far the only interesting part of the story is the dude who is publicly claiming that Joe Biden was aware and a part of Hunter's money-making schemes. That should be pursued. The sexting and other shit is just noise. There's no shortage of screwed up politicians' kids.

 

However I personally think it stretches the imagination to claim that Joe didn't know his kid was using his name and position for personal gain. If there was ever an argument that Joe wasn't fully a swamp creature, and I don't think there was, it should be laid to rest.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, slackline said:

So I'm just curious, what happens when the election comes and goes and no one ever substantiates any of this stuff? Not saying that will happen, but I think we can all agree this, or any administration in recent history isn't necessarily trustworthy. We're a week out, and everyone with all this proof, except for the super reputable sources quoted by torqued, are mum.

And who knows, maybe they're going to drop all these bombshells. At this point, nothing is surprising...

What are all of you die-hard Trumpeters going to say? Wait, I know, you'll say #fakenews...

Ever played poker? If you're a politician and you're sitting on a trove of information detrimental to your opponents, it can be of tremendous value. Once it has been made public, it no longer has value.

My point is: the laptop is real, and it does contain information. Everyone wants to know everything that's on it. I think Trump and his team know how much they need to allude to this information to get public interest, how much proof they need to provide to eek out a win, and how much they can use against their opponents for the next 4 years.

Perhaps, it's a bluff, perhaps it's not. Don't expect to get any more proof than is necessary to lock up the election.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...