Jump to content

The Next President is...


disgruntledemployee

Recommended Posts

33 minutes ago, FLEA said:

https://www.econlib.org/is-there-politics-after-polarization/

 

Very short read but I think it captures the current predicament well. The quote captured it well. 

 

Good article.  I recently watched this video which hits on some similar points related to unifying the country.  I certainly don’t agree with all of Hedges views, but he has some very interesting observations.  He is critical of the right and the left in this piece as well as the media/big tech.  It’s definitely worth the watch if have an hour or so.  
 

 

Edited by lloyd christmas
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ClearedHot said:

I hate to ask but why do you so specifically hate Jen Psaki? IMHO being a spokesperson is a hard and thankless job and FFS she’s a 100% improvement on the empty podium we’ve been offered for the last ~6 months or so. 🤷‍♂️ I mean most of us here are cranky old men here (myself included) but this seems like a weird thing to piss you off so specifically. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, nsplayr said:

I hate to ask but why do you so specifically hate Jen Psaki? IMHO being a spokesperson is a hard and thankless job and FFS she’s a 100% improvement on the empty podium we’ve been offered for the last ~6 months or so. 🤷‍♂️ I mean most of us here are cranky old men here (myself included) but this seems like a weird thing to piss you off so specifically. 

Mainly because of the tripe she used to spew at State.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

https://www.dawn.com/news/amp/1604695

Fucking called it. Hope everyone is ready for another round of deployments. It's the gift that keeps giving. 

 

“Conditions have not been met,” he said, on condition of anonymity, because of the sensitivity of the matter. “And with the new US administration, there will be tweaks in the policy, the sense of hasty withdrawal which was prevalent will be addressed and we could see a much more calculated exit strategy.”

Edited by FLEA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/28/2021 at 2:53 PM, Lord Ratner said:

Not sure what you listen to, because Shapiro was all over the riots at the Capitol. I suspect what you're really looking for is someone on the right to criticize the right in the same way that someone on the left would, but that's a silly expectation. Conservatives can only be compared to other conservatives, in this case, and when you compare someone like Shapiro or Weinstein to, say, Fox news, the difference is obvious.

 

It's not like Trump has some sort of endless laundry list of problems. He's immoral in his personal life, uneducated on the issues, bad with his hiring decisions in many cases, and a terrible communicator to most of the electorate. I listen to Shapiro go off on those regularly. 

 

And there's zero comparison between the right and left insofar as defending their extremists. Democratic politicians tied themselves in knots doing everything in their power to minimize criticism of antifa and rioters over the summer. I've seen no such reluctance on the right to criticize white supremacists and rioters on the 6th.

 

But part of this is that if you think government is the solution to many of our problems (leftist), you're going to find fault in any conservative message, and conservatives are going to seem very similar to you. Same goes for the right.

Other than a couple of perfunctory comments, I have not observed Shapiro as ‘all over the riots’. If you have examples, please share. I listen to a wide range of podcasts, primarily because topics are explored in far more depth than current, conventional mass-consumption media.

Can you provide an example of someone on the right who critically examines their own side in the manner of Tulsi?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe this belongs in the WTF thread, but I found this article interesting:

Pause in Corporate PAC Spending Triggers Political Pushback
Lawmakers say companies’ suspension of campaign donations puts business priorities at risk

https://www.wsj.com/articles/pause-in-corporate-pac-spending-triggers-political-pushback-11612175400?st=sul454ilsy205y1&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

Yes, our wonderful congress is actually bitching they aren't getting enough money for their PACs, and they are insinuating that it will hurt legislation beneficial to these businesses.

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Lord Ratner said:

Yikes. There's a whole lot of "I told ya so" that'll come from that clip.

Only for anyone who didn't watch a single clip of him during the campaign.  This is nothing new.  Like, not even a little bit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, pawnman said:

Only for anyone who didn't watch a single clip of him during the campaign.  This is nothing new.  Like, not even a little bit.

I'm pretty sure I heard this before -

"Don't worry about what he says, he'll build a good team around him and get things done."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Homestar said:

Elections have consequences. 

Yes they do and I am sure you and the other folks that voted for Biden are proud of his achievements like some of the following.

- 42 Executive Orders, more than any President in history.  More than Trump and Obama combined.  Even though he said Dictator use EOs.

 

 

- Keystone Pipeline - 10,000 lost jobs and gas prices on the rise up, 9% locally (there are of course other factors as well).  I feel so much safer given there are no other pipelines out there...oh wayment.

9d8dc52dfd3b563ea657ab451171d03c.gif

 

- Paris Climate Accord - No worries John Kerry promised West Virginia Coal miners "Solar Panel manufacturing" jobs even though 73% of that capability resides in China.

regional-distribution-of-solar-pv-module

 

- Stopped withdraw from AFG.  Hurray, endless deployments for all my friends.

 

- Let it slip that  Khalid Sheikh Mohammed will get vaccine before millions of vulnerable Americans he tried to kill.

UFB!

 

 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m on board with your point about Afghanistan and vaccinations 100%.

The Keystone pipeline and the Paris climate accords are both issues primarily related to global warming. Which, many believe, is an existential threat to the world. In my opinion, they are much better solutions than the republican strategy of not doing anything at all. To me, the republican strat for global warming was similar to the COVID strat: say it will go away on its own and put earplugs in.

There are hundreds, probably of thousands, of graphs like these that point to our future trajectory. What’s the plan?

 

D68C392C-98EB-4994-833B-17B7D61D7C98.jpeg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agree we need a plan, but the plan we are signing up for puts an unfair burden on the U.S. ($20,000 per American family), when we are not the biggest emitters of green house gases AND we are already decreasing our emissions.   I am not a climate change denier...It is real, it is a threat and we need to take action NOW.  The problem is the United States should not have to shoulder an unfair burden.

CO2_emission_pie_chart.svg

 

By the way, even though we left the Paris Climate Accord, We have reduced our emissions more than any other industrialized nation...the real threat is China.

AEI-Chart-with-2017-CO2-Emissions.png

 

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/30/2021 at 5:49 PM, ClearedHot said:

Seriously?  So you are saying Jen Psaki is pure as the driven snow and she doesn't lie.  Come on man!

Psaki outright lied as State Department Spokesperson.

Conway and Spice were horrible, I liked Huckabee, she gave what she got...Post Spicer that press room was radioactive and combative from the first day she walked to the podium.  The point of the post was they are sticking to a script and if it isn't on the script they don't know what to do.  She is the White House Press Secretary, she should do better than fumble through a book for a scripted answer and when she can't find it "circle back."

For the record, during my career "I don't know" was usually an acceptable answer especially during my time at the WIC if it was followed up with, but I know how to find the answer.  It was not an acceptable answer on a checkride if we were talking ops limits, it was not an acceptable answer in a TIC if I asked where the friendlies were, and it was not acceptable the night my wife was driving our family to dinner off base and a young asshat Airman was driving so crazy he ran us off the road and into a field. 

Quick story...For two miles this chump tried to pass us in heavy traffic and nearly clipped the back of our SUV both times.  My wife is not a slow driver and we were doing 60 in a 55, and he was still about a foot off our bumper trying to pass.   He tried twice to pass and almost clipped us each time as he jumped back in line.  When he finally did pass there was oncoming traffic and not enough room.  He was was about dead even with us and my wife had to swerve off the road and into a field to avoid a head on collision, he kept on going.  We got back on the road and wouldn't you know it he got caught at the long traffic light so we caught up to him.  I had consumed a few adult beverages at the club and figured it best not to confront someone offbase so I wrote down his tag and called the Mission Support Group Commander to have the SPs run the tag (dude looked military).  Wouldn't you know it came back to Airman Snuffy from Mx Sq... he was standing in my office at 0700 on Monday with his Sq/CC and Grp/CC.  I asked him what were you thinking..."I don't know?"  Did you think about stopping when you ran my wife, my son and my off the road and into that field...."I don't know..."  That was his answer to everything.  Only time I ever really went off on someone for "I don't know."

 

She’s not impressive in that role, which requires one to think on her feet. 
Two observations:

- Blitzer did a decent job pressing her to provide a clear answer.  CNN leans left, but I’m glad to observe at least one reporter trying to be objective.  I can’t recall Fox doing the same with Trump’s press folks. 
- With regard to the aggressive driver; I hope your family was not harmed. It is fortunate that you had recourse due to the somewhat unique circumstances That’s just a standard day on the road in Boston. It is remarkable we don’t have rampant road rage up here. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Swamp Yankee said:

She’s not impressive in that role, which requires one to think on her feet. 
Two observations:

- Blitzer did a decent job pressing her to provide a clear answer.  CNN leans left, but I’m glad to observe at least one reporter trying to be objective.  I can’t recall Fox doing the same with Trump’s press folks. 
- With regard to the aggressive driver; I hope your family was not harmed. It is fortunate that you had recourse due to the somewhat unique circumstances That’s just a standard day on the road in Boston. It is remarkable we don’t have rampant road rage up here. 

I wish ALL networks would press folks regardless of political party...that was the original intent of the press.

I hear you on Boston, my sister lives up there and everytime I visit it is a shitshow.  My brother-in-law is a deputy police chief in the area and he drives like a maniac...and that is saying something considering how fast I drive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ClearedHot said:

Agree we need a plan, but the plan we are signing up for puts an unfair burden on the U.S. ($20,000 per American family), when we are not the biggest emitters of green house gases AND we are already decreasing our emissions.   I am not a climate change denier...It is real, it is a threat and we need to take action NOW.  The problem is the United States should not have to shoulder an unfair burden.

CO2_emission_pie_chart.svg

 

By the way, even though we left the Paris Climate Accord, We have reduced our emissions more than any other industrialized nation...the real threat is China.

AEI-Chart-with-2017-CO2-Emissions.png

 

It’s harder to argue we have some sort of moral high ground when our per capita CO2 expenditure is twice that of China’s. You can’t forget we have 330M and they have 1.4B.

In that framework, what is “fair?”

Link to comment
Share on other sites



Agree we need a plan, but the plan we are signing up for puts an unfair burden on the U.S. ($20,000 per American family), when we are not the biggest emitters of green house gases AND we are already decreasing our emissions.   I am not a climate change denier...It is real, it is a threat and we need to take action NOW.  The problem is the United States should not have to shoulder an unfair burden.
CO2_emission_pie_chart.svg
 
By the way, even though we left the Paris Climate Accord, We have reduced our emissions more than any other industrialized nation...the real threat is China.
AEI-Chart-with-2017-CO2-Emissions.png
 


I generally agree with you on your points (need for action, we've made good progress towards reducing emissions), though with some caveats.

China's the biggest threat, especially if you look at total CO2 produced, and their increasing trend.

While the US has made the most reduction, we were and still are the #2 CO2 producer in the world (2018). So the chart you posted can be misleading, but it does show that we are moving in the right direction.

Total fossil fuel CO2 puts China at #1 , and the US at #2 as of 2018 data.
https://www.investopedia.com/articles/investing/092915/5-countries-produce-most-carbon-dioxide-co2.asp

Per capita we're worse than China, so that does temper some of their CO2 output (with more people you'd expect more total emissions), though they are trending upwards.
https://ourworldindata.org/grapher/consumption-co2-per-capita?stackMode=absolute&time=latest&country=~USA&region=World

We didn't formally leave the Paris Accords until Nov 2020, and it looks like we'll rejoin in March 2021, so I don't think leaving really did anything beyond symbolic.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed that leaving was symbolic, but it was still counterproductive if we don’t have actual solutions or plans to make it “fair.”

The only way to “win” here is using soft power to get everyone on board. You can’t invade China to shut off their manufacturing. And, as the past 4 years have shown, you can’t really impose tariffs nearly as effectively as we would hope.

This is the cost of China becoming a superpower (mainly due to how much shopping I do at Walmart).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, ClearedHot said:

Yes they do and I am sure you and the other folks that voted for Biden are proud of his achievements like some of the following.

- 42 Executive Orders, more than any President in history.  More than Trump and Obama combined.  Even though he said Dictator use EOs.

 

 

- Keystone Pipeline - 10,000 lost jobs and gas prices on the rise up, 9% locally (there are of course other factors as well).  I feel so much safer given there are no other pipelines out there...oh wayment.

9d8dc52dfd3b563ea657ab451171d03c.gif

 

- Paris Climate Accord - No worries John Kerry promised West Virginia Coal miners "Solar Panel manufacturing" jobs even though 73% of that capability resides in China.

regional-distribution-of-solar-pv-module

 

- Stopped withdraw from AFG.  Hurray, endless deployments for all my friends.

 

- Let it slip that  Khalid Sheikh Mohammed will get vaccine before millions of vulnerable Americans he tried to kill.

UFB!

 

 

I voted for Biden because Trump was an immoral option. I couldn’t look my kids in the eye and explain any reasoning for voting for him. I’m a conservative without a home. I’m a proud Never Trumper that actually votes for and encourages actual conservatism. Trump was none of that. Screw that guy. He was horrible for our country in all respects. I seriously don’t care what liberal utopia crap we get in the next two years because it means Trump isn’t in office. Jeez. You guys make it seem that Biden’s EOs are going to ring in the apocalypse. 

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Agreed that leaving was symbolic, but it was still counterproductive if we don’t have actual solutions or plans to make it “fair.”
The only way to “win” here is using soft power to get everyone on board. You can’t invade China to shut off their manufacturing. And, as the past 4 years have shown, you can’t really impose tariffs nearly as effectively as we would hope.
This is the cost of China becoming a superpower (mainly due to how much shopping I do at Walmart).
Whether we are in the Paris Accords or not, being the example like in CH's chart buys us credibility in the world to get others to do the same.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Homestar said:

I voted for Biden because Trump was an immoral option. I couldn’t look my kids in the eye and explain any reasoning for voting for him. I’m a conservative without a home. I’m a proud Never Trumper that actually votes for and encourages actual conservatism. Trump was none of that. Screw that guy. He was horrible for our country in all respects. I seriously don’t care what liberal utopia crap we get in the next two years because it means Trump isn’t in office. Jeez. You guys make it seem that Biden’s EOs are going to ring in the apocalypse. 

Neil Gorsuch.

Brett Kavanaugh.

Amy Barrett.

Kicking Iran's dick in.

Not engaging in any new wars - something no President since Regan? Carter? has been able to do.

Attempting to normalize relations with NK.

Overseeing numerous ME peace deals.

No president is morally perfect. Trump and Biden included. I don't think most conservatives are worried about Biden per se, though...most know that Biden is a place-holder; an empty vessel who is merely the wedge the woke machine needed to use in order to regain the executive branch. Look at the rest of people who were in the race - Kamala, Bernie, Warren, Buttigieg, Beto, etc. There are not moderate people. Biden is the lightly salted mashed potatoes who they had to put foward in order to get moderate democrats motivated to think they had a shot and get out to the polls en masse - that wouldn't have happened with a Bernie.

Personally I think Joe Biden is basically a good man - would probably have been an ok president at some point. That said, this guy is just getting started with probably one of the most stressful jobs in the world, and he's already (waaaaay) past his expiration date. Look at what 8 years did to Bush Jr. and Obama - they came out different men. Does anyone honestly expect this is a guy who's about to be a two-term president?

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, ViperMan said:

Neil Gorsuch.

Brett Kavanaugh.

Amy Barrett.

Kicking Iran's dick in.

Not engaging in any new wars - something no President since Regan? Carter? has been able to do.

Attempting to normalize relations with NK.

Overseeing numerous ME peace deals.

No president is morally perfect. Trump and Biden included. I don't think most conservatives are worried about Biden per se, though...most know that Biden is a place-holder; an empty vessel who is merely the wedge the woke machine needed to use in order to regain the executive branch. Look at the rest of people who were in the race - Kamala, Bernie, Warren, Buttigieg, Beto, etc. There are not moderate people. Biden is the lightly salted mashed potatoes who they had to put foward in order to get moderate democrats motivated to think they had a shot and get out to the polls en masse - that wouldn't have happened with a Bernie.

Personally I think Joe Biden is basically a good man - would probably have been an ok president at some point. That said, this guy is just getting started with probably one of the most stressful jobs in the world, and he's already (waaaaay) past his expiration date. Look at what 8 years did to Bush Jr. and Obama - they came out different men. Does anyone honestly expect this is a guy who's about to be a two-term president?

I can get on board with SCOTUS picks and winding down wars (though I honestly believe he did by straight up neglecting his Commander-in-Chief duties). 
 

But saying nobody is perfect then getting on board with Trump as POTUS is a non starter for me. Nobody is perfect, true. But Trump did actual damage to the American psyche and seriously fractured Republican politics for a generation. This is not something to be proud of just because “he told it like it is”. 
 

Biden an empty vessel placeholder? Fine. Anyone but Trump. I’d prefer an actual conservative, but in the meantime I can put up with the meaningless EOs that don’t affect me in any measurable way day-to-day. In two years maybe the Republicans rediscover what it means to be conservative now that they don’t have to bow and kiss the ring of Trump. 
 

Edit to add: I hope Adam Kinzinger is still reading this forum. He is the future of the Republican Party. If he and Dan Crenshaw could combine forces we could actually return to real conservative leadership. 

Edited by Homestar
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Homestar said:

I can get on board with SCOTUS picks and winding down wars (though I honestly believe he did by straight up neglecting his Commander-in-Chief duties). 

But saying nobody is perfect then getting on board with Trump as POTUS is a non starter for me. Nobody is perfect, true. But Trump did actual damage to the American psyche and seriously fractured Republican politics for a generation. This is not something to be proud of just because “he told it like it is”. 

Biden an empty vessel placeholder? Fine. Anyone but Trump. I’d prefer an actual conservative, but in the meantime I can put up with the meaningless EOs that don’t affect me in any measurable way day-to-day. In two years maybe the Republicans rediscover what it means to be conservative now that they don’t have to bow and kiss the ring of Trump. 

Edit to add: I hope Adam Kinzinger is still reading this forum. He is the future of the Republican Party. If he and Dan Crenshaw could combine forces we could actually return to real conservative leadership. 

Fair enough. I would ask you, though, if he did it by neglect, where else should we currently be at war?

I would go a lot further, however. Modern-day politics has been completely F'd starting in '03 because of our ill-conceived venture into Iraq. I'm glad the rest of the world is waking up to how screwed up our politics is across the board. If it was Trump that woke people up, great, but Trump ain't the root cause. My main concern is that there are people who are only seeking to take advantage of the current situation who don't give one F about the actual future of this country. IMO those people are now in charge and that worries me.

Edited by ViperMan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, ViperMan said:

Modern-day politics has been completely F'd starting in '03 because of our ill-conceived venture into Iraq.

I agree. I voted for Bush in 2000 but not in 2004. 
 

Disagree that the current people in charge don’t care about the country. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...