Jump to content

What's wrong with the Air Force?


Catbox

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Biff_T said:

I got Chiefed for cutting the chin string off of my boonie hat.  This was in 2003 as we were invading Iraq.  I saw another dude get Cheifed for not wearing his ID on his arm as he was eating at the chow hall.  He had just finished flying in Iraq.  This was around March - April 2003 time frame as well.   We were literally invading Iraq and all the Chief cared about was an ID card on an arm.  We were flying every day with min ground time.  Barely had time eat.   I've always wanted to thank that Chief for keeping us safe in the chow hall during those crazy times.  

During that time period lots of E-8's and 7's who made sure to go class C for dental or carpal tunnel when it was their turn to deploy. Then they got directed they will deploy or get out and marked down on their board scores for never been deployed in their 20 year career. That is when we saw the rash of guys who brought nothing to the fight but making themselves a pain in ass. Spent their time being uniform haircut police and writing each other bronze stars so they can make E-9.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

E-9 Stories?

Manas in January: I deployed with no winter outer gear. I'd load up on thermals with just my flight suit. Best thing I eventually got was a summer weight green nomex jacket that they had to mail out to me.

Shockingly, never get E-9'd for that...but I would normally layer up my PTs since it was warmer. I had the recently outdated grey PT sweatshirt that said "Air Force" instead of the new one with the AF logo. I wasn't in the chow hall for more than 60 seconds before I got told I couldn't wear that. Yeap, young LT me wasn't having any of that. Surprised I never got talked to later for basically telling the dude to go ef himself since it was -15*F outside and I wasn't taking off the only warm freaking thing I had on the deployment.

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/26/2022 at 7:48 AM, SocialD said:

AF:  Here is your issued Boonie hat.  You have to bring it because it's on the mandatory packing list.

 

Also AF (in country):  You can not wear that Boonie hat...here is the memo stating so.  

 

True story.  

 

DOD:  No PT gear in your deployed location, just duty uniforms or civies...don't even bring PT gear.

 

*Guard unit gets moved to new location in AOR to stand up AOG, things are going great...then AD shows up*

 

AD Chief:  why are your people in civies and not AF PT gear?  AFI blah blah blah says duty uniform or pt gear...no civies.

 

Also true story.  

Please tell me the guard leadership told said AD Zebra Douche to pound sand?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/26/2022 at 11:00 AM, ATIS said:

Early days of DRACO ('06-'07)...Type 2 for sure.  Saw that start to switch over ~2008.

ATIS

DRACO definitely had many type 2 commanders.  Great Americans; the plank holders built a mission focused culture, so well done.  You’d be crazy proud of how the younger teammates made it better.  

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, tac airlifter said:

DRACO definitely had many type 2 commanders.  Great Americans; the plank holders built a mission focused culture, so well done.  You’d be crazy proud of how the younger teammates made it better.  

In complete contrast, the MC-12 program was a shit show. I'd pay a king's ransom to have that year of my life back. 

Edited by HuggyU2
  • Like 4
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 hours ago, dream big said:

Please tell me the guard leadership told said AD Zebra Douche to pound sand?

 

 

The response was pretty much, "get over it dude, we didn't bring any issued PT gear with us."  Now lets move on to real issues that are actually important, like half the force having the shits because the shitters are leaking into the water that is used to wash/cook our food...  


They also tried to take our rooftop "fanta drink 🥃" and cigar hide out.  MFers....just point the radar dishes the other way! 😂  I think it was Rainman that said war is only fun for the first year.  In our case, it was only fun for about 3 weeks...

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Down vote bro...lol?  Come on you know that shit was funny. 

BTW my community has had its share of people like that guy.

For the record, I have mad respect for the DRACO community.  Many of those plank holders are close friends.  I am well aware of the sacrifices they made and the quality of leadership that stood up that program.   Also, getting them in the WIC was one of the best things we ever did (I fought hard for it).  It is awesome to see the all the DRACOs spreading into leadership positions and having so much an impact in the community.

 

Screen Shot 2022-10-28 at 4.15.20 PM.png

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, viper154 said:

Must have been nice. Draco has gone full opposite from that, and honestly most of AFSOC for that matter. 

I’m surprised to hear that. I’m good friends with 2 of the 4 sitting ops squadron commanders and they are fantastic dudes. I guess YMMV and I’m not there anymore myself, so perhaps things change…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, nsplayr said:

I’m surprised to hear that. I’m good friends with 2 of the 4 sitting ops squadron commanders and they are fantastic dudes. I guess YMMV and I’m not there anymore myself, so perhaps things change…

With some of the recent change of commands things are expected to and seem to be improving. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 months later...

Revisiting the AF Mortuary Affairs emblem debacle of a few years ago...

It appears they didn't go with the draft that had the F-16 silhouettes replacing the Flankers.  They simply got rid of all airplanes on the emblem. 
32427D42-7D0C-4847-B670-7FFF6C077AA2.thumb.png.e50433a0edacc42c03bb12f5cbf0ff98.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Revisiting the AF Mortuary Affairs emblem debacle of a few years ago...
It appears they didn't go with the draft that had the F-16 silhouettes replacing the Flankers.  They simply got rid of all airplanes on the emblem. 
32427D42-7D0C-4847-B670-7FFF6C077AA2.thumb.png.e50433a0edacc42c03bb12f5cbf0ff98.png


I might be wrong, but I don’t think you’re supposed to have a specific aircraft type on any sort of organizational insignia.

I don’t know why, maybe if your unit goes into conversion or starts flying a different airplane… I don’t know but, I do remember that as being a thing.

Maybe the patch Nazis at the heritage center called them out on their F-16s after the aviation community called them out on their SU 27s?


Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/26/2022 at 2:07 PM, StoleIt said:

E-9 Stories?

My opinion, which is going to be surprise surprise highly unpopular - is that we should not have E-9s or E-8s in the Air Force.  In the AF officers do the fighting.  Sure, there are some exceptions but by and large the officers (aircrew) are what the exord is providing to meet the wartime requirement.  

So we need support to meet the demands of the aircrew, just like infantry needs support.  But the difference is, in the AF, the infantry is all officers (exceptions noted).  So unlike the Army, we don't need high ranking enlisted to support the requirement (aircrew).  In the Army and Marines, you have a boatload of enlisted in the fight.  Actually fighting.  So it makes sense that you have high ranking enlisted guiding those troops.  Not so in the AF.  I flew in combat and called in a few airstrikes on the ground in the AF while supporting Armies, and I never once, in any of those situations, needed an E-8/9 who had not only not done what I did and the Armies were doing, but didn't even understand it.

I think this is why we have the Leadership in the Deid thread.  AF officers just accept that we are just like every other branch and need some senior Es to look like the other services.  In my experience that has gone horribly wrong.  On the ground side if you ever wanted to ID someone who was not in the fight and therefore more concerned about reflective belts and other nonsense, you just pointed to an E8/9.  Same was true in garrison.  My anecdotal experience.  I've had an awful lot of non aircrew officers disagree with me on this and maintain that MSgt/CMSgts are gold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, filthy_liar said:

My opinion, which is going to be surprise surprise highly unpopular - is that we should not have E-9s or E-8s in the Air Force.  In the AF officers do the fighting.  Sure, there are some exceptions but by and large the officers (aircrew) are what the exord is providing to meet the wartime requirement.  

So we need support to meet the demands of the aircrew, just like infantry needs support.  But the difference is, in the AF, the infantry is all officers (exceptions noted).  So unlike the Army, we don't need high ranking enlisted to support the requirement (aircrew).  In the Army and Marines, you have a boatload of enlisted in the fight.  Actually fighting.  So it makes sense that you have high ranking enlisted guiding those troops.  Not so in the AF.  I flew in combat and called in a few airstrikes on the ground in the AF while supporting Armies, and I never once, in any of those situations, needed an E-8/9 who had not only not done what I did and the Armies were doing, but didn't even understand it.

I think this is why we have the Leadership in the Deid thread.  AF officers just accept that we are just like every other branch and need some senior Es to look like the other services.  In my experience that has gone horribly wrong.  On the ground side if you ever wanted to ID someone who was not in the fight and therefore more concerned about reflective belts and other nonsense, you just pointed to an E8/9.  Same was true in garrison.  My anecdotal experience.  I've had an awful lot of non aircrew officers disagree with me on this and maintain that MSgt/CMSgts are gold. 

I spoke at an ROTC career night recently. I got dropped jaws from the cadre when I told the cadets that I would never recommend a 2Lt "just trust" their SNCO's. I know SOOOOOO many Lt's that got burned because they "trusted the SNCO's." That advice is given under the pretense that you are going to put a Lt in an organization that is baseline successful and not dysfunctional. I know a 1Lt 13M who was given a flight command in a flight that was in a separate facility from the rest of the squadron and completely lacked discipline and decorum. Her flight chief convinced her it was "ok, that it "wasn't a training environment anymore" and things didn't have to be "exact." Not how her commander felt when they failed a surprise SAV for multiple safety related violations. She was fired and issued discipline for dereliction. No one cared that her E-8 or whatever mentored her to do that. 

Edited by FLEA
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, you brought up a lot of good points there. My ex was personnel/services.  Her perspective on senior NCOs is 180 from mine.  Unlike me she was dropped into some kind of an enormous flight as a 2lLt.  And her first sq command as a major was at Kunsan where they dealt with all kinds of crap that I didn't have to deal with when I sat in the seat.  But even then after the earloads of here's what happened today, it was always "My chief advised me to do this." And when I got in the seat I figured - this isn't that hard, here's what we're going to do.  I didn't need a chief or a SMSgt.  Didn't need any sergeant.

In case I don't log in tomorrow, I've been murdered by ProSuper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, filthy_liar said:

Yea, you brought up a lot of good points there. My ex was personnel/services.  Her perspective on senior NCOs is 180 from mine.  Unlike me she was dropped into some kind of an enormous flight as a 2lLt.  And her first sq command as a major was at Kunsan where they dealt with all kinds of crap that I didn't have to deal with when I sat in the seat.  But even then after the earloads of here's what happened today, it was always "My chief advised me to do this." And when I got in the seat I figured - this isn't that hard, here's what we're going to do.  I didn't need a chief or a SMSgt.  Didn't need any sergeant.

In case I don't log in tomorrow, I've been murdered by ProSuper.

I'm confused was Prosuper your wife or your chief?

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe you’ve just interacted with a lot of bad ones 🤷‍♂️

I’ve seen a few great ones, a lot of good ones, and some bad ones. Not unlike officers. YMMV.

I, like you, have never needed a SNCO to advise me on much as an aircrew member unless they are part of the crew (FE/Boom/Load/Sensor/etc.), but that changes quite a bit when/if you take Command or are otherwise in charge of a large group of enlisted airmen. In those cases I 100% want a great SNCO by my side.

My biggest WTF in this general area was the need for a First Shirt in an ops squadron that was  96.9% officers. Our only enlisted were CSS and ARMS. The shirt literally did nothing relevant AFAIK and any issues I had as an LT or Capt needed to be taken to my flt/cc, the DO or CC to be solved, not the random one-off MSgt with a triangle on his sleeve…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, nsplayr said:

I’ve seen a few great ones, a lot of good ones, and some bad ones. Not unlike officers. YMMV.

Fair one.  My moves did vary, but I acknowledge that in some circumstances E8s and 9s might be valuable.  But I'm under duress. The ProSuper thing.  He actually might kill me.  And that's another thing about SNCOs,,,

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, filthy_liar said:

My opinion, which is going to be surprise surprise highly unpopular - is that we should not have E-9s or E-8s in the Air Force.  In the AF officers do the fighting.  Sure, there are some exceptions but by and large the officers (aircrew) are what the exord is providing to meet the wartime requirement.  

So we need support to meet the demands of the aircrew, just like infantry needs support.  But the difference is, in the AF, the infantry is all officers (exceptions noted).  So unlike the Army, we don't need high ranking enlisted to support the requirement (aircrew).  In the Army and Marines, you have a boatload of enlisted in the fight.  Actually fighting.  So it makes sense that you have high ranking enlisted guiding those troops.  Not so in the AF.  I flew in combat and called in a few airstrikes on the ground in the AF while supporting Armies, and I never once, in any of those situations, needed an E-8/9 who had not only not done what I did and the Armies were doing, but didn't even understand it.

I think this is why we have the Leadership in the Deid thread.  AF officers just accept that we are just like every other branch and need some senior Es to look like the other services.  In my experience that has gone horribly wrong.  On the ground side if you ever wanted to ID someone who was not in the fight and therefore more concerned about reflective belts and other nonsense, you just pointed to an E8/9.  Same was true in garrison.  My anecdotal experience.  I've had an awful lot of non aircrew officers disagree with me on this and maintain that MSgt/CMSgts are gold. 

I get your point but a good E-8 or E-9 can be worth their weight in gold if: the unit has a lot of enlisted personnel which most units above the squadron level and above do, the associated officer is not a giant pussy and utilizes them correctly, and the E-8 or E-9 is a good dude/gal that mentors and looks after the young people and doesn’t care about mustache length and ball caps.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...