Jump to content

What's wrong with the Air Force?


Catbox

Recommended Posts

On 4/10/2020 at 5:41 PM, joe1234 said:

Is it really a cancer, though? I mean, if your concerns are clearly and logically valid, then you should have no trouble getting the currency requirements increased. Go and raise the minimum standard by which the pilots are expected to maintain. Ah, but then that's the trick, because now you're making it harder for squadrons to send people on the road to fill taskings coming down from the dudes wearing stars. Which means your priorities are in direct conflict of the other 25 agencies who all think their priorities are the most important thing in the world, too.

 

It’s not about raising currency requirements or beans.  Those will be pencil whipped anyways! It’s about training to proficiency when you’re home / not off station.  Now, I’m mainly speaking to tactical airlift; those same generals you allude to have asked us to prepare for the next fight- whatever that looks like, it won’t be shooting an ILS to a full stop or beating feet to the Hilton.  
 

That culture, of training to proficiency in our tactical competencies, starts with the senior IP core, enabled by good DOs / CCs who eliminate the queep so we can focus on our jobs. 
 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dream big said:

That culture, of training to proficiency in our tactical competencies, starts with the senior IP core, enabled by good DOs / CCs who eliminate the queep so we can focus on our jobs. 

The "senior IP core" is a slick wing captain that has no desire to do much other than shoot an ILS to a full stop.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Orbit said:

The "senior IP core" is a slick wing captain that has no desire to do much other than shoot an ILS to a full stop.  

Yes, and that’s what I’m saying is the problem. I’m sure it varies by community or squadron in the MAF, but that is the problem.  Again, zero qualms against those who want to serve their commitment and head to Delta, I’m 50/50 and don’t blame a soul for heading off to greener pastures.  But while we are here in the Air Force, we have a professional duty to be better than the “vectors to an ILS.”  Oh btw, I place 100% of the blame on big AMC and the years of queep and careerism that’s fostered this culture, not my bros. 

  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like a lack of passion, lack of duty, lack of responsibility, ok a whole bunch of lackey that needs to be driven out by leadership top to the bottom and Instructors are where the rubber meets the road. As a former instructor I relished the responsibility given to us to motivate and propagate that passion, etc above to maximize training events with vigor and realism with imaginative “what if” moments to our crews and not so much if, but when you find yourself needing to push the flight envelope/long duty periods during crisis/wartime events. (Nice run on sentence) Granted it was a lot easier right after 9/11 broadcasting this sh*t is for real and folks are counting on us - better yet you need to count on each other to stay alive. This is only from a former 141, but mostly my C17 perspective. Went from lackadaisical 2+ hour locals maybe some tanker time, etc. to 4,5,6+ and 8.3 being the longest which was definitely excessive and thought I could have been to Germany by now eating Schnitzel dammit; nevertheless we did double of everything (Tanker run, LLevel, Day Assaults, Grd Ops, pattern work, LLevel, back 2 tankers (dusk), NVG Assaults, Grd Ops, night pattern work dog tired) Definitely pinged the Higher Risk levels and we didn’t do it often, but it’s something when you prove everyone can do it and we weren’t even doing airdrop - kudos to you guys. Learned a lot from former SOLL II guys who pushed us on those extra parameters (legal for them/not for us) which was quite impressive and just more tricks in the bag. 
 

So much queep/extra duty/filling squares/CBTs, etc. pushed to the forefront when it needs to be sidelined for your pilot skills which need to be honed/sharpened. It’s not airline flying, you are the tip of the spear when something does rear it’s ugly head and lazy instructors are giving you the shaft. Judas Preist it’s not good when currency is overvalued and not proficiency which has been a cyclic issue. Commanders do your job, IP’s pass your skills, AC’s demand proficiency beyond up and downs, co-pilots push to fly. It’s sad when a few folks become seagulls and you gotta throw rocks at them to fly. I even see that in long haul in the commercial sector which is dumbfounding. Screw it, I want to fly and will steal legs when hesitation presents itself. I want to be up front, that is where the wizardry resides and I want more.

“Always play a better tennis player when given the chance.”  Apologies, it truly sucks when I hear Instructors don’t give a $h*t. No cents given, just common sense as you all understand. Thanks for the time.

Edited by AirGuardianC141747
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dream big said:

But while we are here in the Air Force, we have a professional duty to be better than the “vectors to an ILS.”

In the words of The Dude, "yeah well, that's just, like, your opinion, man". I appreciate that you have your opinions on what our professional duty consists of, but so does stan eval, safety, the DO, the commander, the wing king, the MAJCOM, and so forth. And that battle has already been fought, the result being the MDS vol 1/2. Anything above that is technique, and I hope you're making that clear to the guys you're instructing after preaching about professional duty.

Personally I like instructing, and I'll advocate for going above the minimum, but if a guy wants to get vectors for the ILS and then speed off to the airlines, that's entirely their prerogative and there's absolutely nothing wrong with it.

Edited by joe1234
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Speeding off to the airlines (already having been hired on the line) as a Reserve/Guard type, totally get it based upon you gotta feed your family and you are after all part of the Reserve component and normally there is a warm up period/sometimes not, prior to activation - kind of depends on what your currency requirements are. Not all MDS’s are created equal. But just lying in wait not doing your part (it’s obvious to that individual there is no doubt) and speeding off to the airlines when the call comes.... Well....

Nothing to say, cuz they ain’t no speeding off now. That door is almost shut (bar the cargo gigs for the most part) and if hired now or fairly recently the jeopardy is well understood. This isn’t a get above the bottom 15% and no issues anymore. There is no speeding anywhere.

“Fate IsThe Hunter”, is not just a memoir...

Edited by AirGuardianC141747
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’m trying to think of a time in my tanker career when a combat sortie didn’t end with vectors to the ILS at the Deid.....

I specifically remember being taught that rolling wings level and bracing for impact was the best, most reliable tactic I could implement though. 

Plenty of non-ILS landings in the Caravan in Afghanistan, but I digress..

Link to comment
Share on other sites


Plenty of non-ILS landings in the Caravan in Afghanistan, but I digress..”

But Homestar, I am pretty dang sure you could TLAR pretty much anything without a magenta line or even DME necessarily. You probably hand flew your gas can more than most while we hooked up. 141 specialized crews were spit out far more than the Barrel Body Globetrotter slipstream/ bow wave and all, . Stick and Rudder ain’t a bad skill to have at all. Heck we’ve been doing non-ILS into Bagram lately in a 74. It’s not as fun like it was on NVGs playing supposed tactical games, but we have our moments Whale riding.

No pilot shortage now or for awhile, so might as well enjoy the fun flying before you get some more pay to be boring neck-tie and all.

Edited by AirGuardianC141747
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Homestar said:

I’m trying to think of a time in my tanker career when a combat sortie didn’t end with vectors to the ILS at the Deid.....

I specifically remember being taught that rolling wings level and bracing for impact was the best, most reliable tactic I could implement though. 

Yeah, tankers ain’t fighters ain’t bombers ain’t airlift ain’t U-2s. Vectors to an ILS is an example that makes sense for jets that sometimes need to land in an unsanitized area. His point is that every community can mail it in and get lazy in their own way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the biggest challenges is getting quality training time. When the schedulers load up the jet for currency beans, that local isn't going to be the greatest for tactical training, especially low levels.

There's something to be said for having your butt in the seat for the entire tactical sortie, from preflight to departure to tanker to low level to the objective (airdrop or assault landing) and the egress home. Especially as a basic crew (with an IP over the shoulder running the scenario). But that's a been rarity.

Heck, even in the sim guys short themselves. Lots of stuff you can learn and try (flying in mountainous terrain, challenging weather, etc), but a lot of guys are willing to do the bare minimum and get out early.

Through with a busy ops tempo where 99% of your mission is RNAV coupled departure to vectors to an AP coupled ILS, I can see why it's easy to get into the airline mindset.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SurelySerious said:

Are we really arguing whether getting vectors to final or not makes you a good IP? Forget that whole mission part in the middle...

No dude, it’s anecdotal.  We are arguing whether it’s okay to be mediocre and just shoot for Vol 1/2 minimums like Joe1234 suggests or be the professional combat aviators that our country demands of us.  I have zero doubt as to why our CAF bros scoff at us MAF dudes.  

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dream big said:

No dude, it’s anecdotal.  We are arguing whether it’s okay to be mediocre and just shoot for Vol 1/2 minimums like Joe1234 suggests or be the professional combat aviators that our country demands of us.  I have zero doubt as to why our CAF bros scoff at us MAF dudes.  

Agree DB. If you look like Superman, be Superman rather than Mystery Men. Both Good movies though serious and not so serious.

Although with all the mentioned queep, it’s easy to be “The Shoveler!” At least he’s trying.

Edited by AirGuardianC141747
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, dream big said:

No dude, it’s anecdotal.  We are arguing whether it’s okay to be mediocre and just shoot for Vol 1/2 minimums like Joe1234 suggests or be the professional combat aviators that our country demands of us.  I have zero doubt as to why our CAF bros scoff at us MAF dudes.  

No shit. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, joe1234 said:

In the words of The Dude, "yeah well, that's just, like, your opinion, man". I appreciate that you have your opinions on what our professional duty consists of, but so does stan eval, safety, the DO, the commander, the wing king, the MAJCOM, and so forth. And that battle has already been fought, the result being the MDS vol 1/2. Anything above that is technique, and I hope you're making that clear to the guys you're instructing after preaching about professional duty.

Personally I like instructing, and I'll advocate for going above the minimum, but if a guy wants to get vectors for the ILS and then speed off to the airlines, that's entirely their prerogative and there's absolutely nothing wrong with it.

I get the whole "If the minimum wasn't good enough, it wouldn't be the minimum" attitude...but that's usually what you tell yourself when you don't do very well.
Personally, I don't want to fly with aviators that want to do the bare minimum at flying.  (CBTs, queep, etc?---sure min/max perform that and get back to your real job!...but your actual job?  Shouldn't you be really damn good at that?)

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, raimius said:

I get the whole "If the minimum wasn't good enough, it wouldn't be the minimum" attitude...but that's usually what you tell yourself when you don't do very well.
Personally, I don't want to fly with aviators that want to do the bare minimum at flying.  (CBTs, queep, etc?---sure min/max perform that and get back to your real job!...but your actual job?  Shouldn't you be really damn good at that?)

When you're flying with a student, how do you define your expectations? How do you ensure they meet them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, SurelySerious said:

Are we really arguing whether getting vectors to final or not makes you a good IP? Forget that whole mission part in the middle...

Bingo.  The point wasn't "don't shoot the ILS".  The point was "training should be more challenging than take-off, fly around the flag pole, shoot the ILS".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, pawnman said:

Bingo.  The point wasn't "don't shoot the ILS".  The point was "training should be more challenging than take-off, fly around the flag pole, shoot the ILS".

Yeah, I’m well aware of what the actual discussion was, I was just expressing my incredulousness at the vehicle with which the argument was being made. 
 

If I had to start over on that, I would have just dropped the, “yeah, but who’s getting the ATIS” grenade. 

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, dream big said:

No dude, it’s anecdotal.  We are arguing whether it’s okay to be mediocre and just shoot for Vol 1/2 minimums like Joe1234 suggests or be the professional combat aviators that our country demands of us.  I have zero doubt as to why our CAF bros scoff at us MAF dudes.  

I didn't "suggest" anything, I'm just stating the facts. The vol 1/2 minimums ARE what our country demands of us. That's what is required of a professional combat aviator. And going above those minimums is purely technique. If you want to advocate your techniques and opinions, then fine, make a persuasive argument to pilots you fly with. But, it's bullshit to imply that meeting the standard isn't acceptable, when it actually is. And even more bullshit to get pissed off at other pilots for not meeting whatever arbitrary standard of professionalism you've cooked up in your mind.

  • Like 1
  • Downvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, joe1234 said:

...The vol 1/2 minimums ARE what our country demands of us. That's what is required of a professional combat aviator...

Don’t act like those documents, or any others, are perfect stone tablets handed down from God. It takes continuous improvement from all players to make us all better.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I never said that they were perfect. If you want to advocate beyond those documents, feel free. I certainly do it. But I always make sure, loud and clear, that they understand the fine line of what is actually required of them, and what is simply my personal opinion. But you can't go instruct techniques and enforce subjective standards, and then get pissed off when people don't follow them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I didn't "suggest" anything, I'm just stating the facts. The vol 1/2 minimums ARE what our country demands of us. That's what is required of a professional combat aviator. And going above those minimums is purely technique.


Negative. Those documents are what your MAJCOM demands of you, and the distinction is important. Are we to seriously believe that AMC is on the cutting edge of organizing, equipping, and...to the point, training its people? There is significant empirical data that shows AMC crews are not up to standard. Performance in exercises and downrange for one, or the MAJCOM’s love affair with the Q-3 another. I think it’s quite apparent we do have a training problem in the MAF, despite “meeting the minimums.”

As IPs, we have the choice. Accept what the bobs have written down as gospel. Or we can look at it, acknowledge the rules are for what they are, and still make the choice to be better. I’d also argue that pursuing excellence is procedure and not a technique, as you seem to imply. But i’ll spare the philosophical for now.


Sent from my iPhone using Baseops Network mobile app
  • Like 2
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, torqued said:

When you're flying with a student, how do you define your expectations? How do you ensure they meet them?

I grade to the syllabus, but that doesn't mean I stop there and call it good.  A "G" or "3" or whatever the MIF calls passing is enough to pass, but I don't want people whose goal is to barely pass to be my coworkers.  I don't expect perfection, but being better than you were yesterday should be the dominant attitude in a healthy organization.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Dapper Dan Man said:

Negative. Those documents are what your MAJCOM demands of you, and the distinction is important.

The idea that they are not the same is objectively untrue. You know full well how a military chain of command works.

But honestly, I've dragged this on long enough, and my original point keeps getting strawmanned and twisted, so I'll throw in the towel now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...