FourFans Posted October 13, 2022 Share Posted October 13, 2022 On 10/10/2022 at 5:20 PM, ClearedHot said: A big ole FU to CAA community! If you ever wondered how senior USAF leadership views your contributions, now you have it in writing. Pretty sure you owe beer for posting that ass-hat's name. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LookieRookie Posted October 14, 2022 Share Posted October 14, 2022 So I thought Slife was going to be the HAF/A3 to replace Gus, did something derail that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clark Griswold Posted January 6, 2023 Share Posted January 6, 2023 Meanwhile in Mexico... Light attack in action: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/mexican-light-attack-plane-strafes-cartel-forces-after-arrest-of-el-chapos-son 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slapticles Posted September 7, 2023 Share Posted September 7, 2023 Any updates on the AO stuff? Heard some rumors about the Air Tractors design problems. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawman Posted September 7, 2023 Share Posted September 7, 2023 Meanwhile in Mexico... Light attack in action: https://www.thedrive.com/the-war-zone/mexican-light-attack-plane-strafes-cartel-forces-after-arrest-of-el-chapos-sonIm not sure if I could be less impressed with the weight of fire for its guns….M3P was a bandaid fix because the M2s were literally falling apart and the GAU wasn’t really giving the range necessary to justify its ammo consumption. Yeah it’s a .50 just like the M2, but it barely out ranges a 7.62 and it was putting some level of throw weight on an aircraft that was never intended to be armed in the first place, so something better than nothing. It’s a defensive suppression system masquerading as an offensive piece of firepower and it would have been a bigger gun if the overgrown news helicopter it was designed to support could have held it. Don’t limit yourselves. You are going into a fight with less throw weight than a WWII/Korea era aircraft, in a profile that forces you to live in a wez you lack the redundant Survivability to successfully negotiate when compared to those older aircraft. Sexy < Stand-off/survivable. I’m curious how many majors were gonna lose flying these profiles before we relearn something we knew with the A-1 Skyraider. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Clark Griswold Posted September 7, 2023 Share Posted September 7, 2023 Im not sure if I could be less impressed with the weight of fire for its guns…. M3P was a bandaid fix because the M2s were literally falling apart and the GAU wasn’t really giving the range necessary to justify its ammo consumption. Yeah it’s a .50 just like the M2, but it barely out ranges a 7.62 and it was putting some level of throw weight on an aircraft that was never intended to be armed in the first place, so something better than nothing. It’s a defensive suppression system masquerading as an offensive piece of firepower and it would have been a bigger gun if the overgrown news helicopter it was designed to support could have held it. Don’t limit yourselves. You are going into a fight with less throw weight than a WWII/Korea era aircraft, in a profile that forces you to live in a wez you lack the redundant Survivability to successfully negotiate when compared to those older aircraft. Sexy < Stand-off/survivable. I’m curious how many majors were gonna lose flying these profiles before we relearn something we knew with the A-1 Skyraider. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk Concur Shoot them with a sniper rifle when they have a pistol and win with less risk to you. The economics of direct fire weapon utilization are outweighed ultimately in the risk of loss of platforms, not saying take the guns off jets but in the long run it's better TTPs to just use the 100k Hellfire and shoot from 5 NM out. Gratuitous vapor plane porn for your morning and what fills a hole (sts) in the air to mud requirements. Scorpion like render with additional features that might make it more palatable to the Bobs as it could be incorporated into O-plans as a supporting platform (arsenal platform, jammer, comm node, anti-uav, etc..). Give it range to be a low or no draw on AR resources, ACE capabilities and some reasonable self-defensive capabilities. Now you have the manned platform for SOF support and the gap filler for the big fight, profit. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KState_Poke22 Posted November 18, 2023 Share Posted November 18, 2023 On 9/6/2023 at 11:06 PM, slapticles said: Any updates on the AO stuff? Heard some rumors about the Air Tractors design problems. From what I’ve heard it’s not anything that will affect end state timelines. It’s delays trying to get it IFR certified. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClearedHot Posted November 18, 2023 Share Posted November 18, 2023 On 10/13/2022 at 9:17 PM, LookieRookie said: So I thought Slife was going to be the HAF/A3 to replace Gus, did something derail that? He currently is the HAF/A3....BUT has been nominated to be VCSAF. Waiting on Tuberville and the Sentate. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LookieRookie Posted November 18, 2023 Share Posted November 18, 2023 8 hours ago, ClearedHot said: He currently is the HAF/A3....BUT has been nominated to be VCSAF. Waiting on Tuberville and the Sentate. Blast from the past. I posted that a year ago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skitzo Posted December 16, 2023 Share Posted December 16, 2023 https://www.airandspaceforces.com/slow-down-armed-overwatch-until-socom-justifies-fleet-gao-says/Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brabus Posted December 16, 2023 Share Posted December 16, 2023 For the SOC guys, is 75 too many? It seems high, given the nature of the mission, and I understand max number is always better given a perfect world, but we’re far from a perfect world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger41 Posted December 16, 2023 Share Posted December 16, 2023 What isn’t addressed in that article but I’m convinced is really happening is that other entities with SOCOM didn’t do their due diligence when initial requirements went out, didn’t like the requirements that were set (bell had already been rung), went to the hill and all their fanboys in congress to get their way, and here we are. This program is not a U-28 replacement and they don’t want to lose that capability and gain what OA-1K offers. BL - SOCOM money avalanche from GWOT is done and now the knives are coming out. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Danger41 Posted December 16, 2023 Share Posted December 16, 2023 5 minutes ago, brabus said: For the SOC guys, is 75 too many? It seems high, given the nature of the mission, and I understand max number is always better given a perfect world, but we’re far from a perfect world. At least in the U-28, the fleet was shared between at home units and deployed sites so squadrons never really owned iron in a traditional sense (to include FTU/OT/DT/WIC…all shared). I may have old data but they were actually assigning aircraft more traditionally and the 75 made sense. That probably also assumes GWOT commitment levels so may be a logical fallacy given current time. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raimius Posted December 18, 2023 Share Posted December 18, 2023 Well, the AF never buys too few aircraft... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Biff_T Posted December 19, 2023 Share Posted December 19, 2023 On 12/17/2023 at 6:43 PM, raimius said: Well, the AF never buys too few aircraft... Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nsplayr Posted December 19, 2023 Share Posted December 19, 2023 Congress: Best I can do is 25 and a couple slicks for pilot pro 😆 2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now