Jump to content
Guest navobd

Promotion and PRF Information

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Weezer said:

For my 1 BPZ board to O-5, the O-6 for my MAJCOM directorate found out I was "providing well-formatted inputs" into my PRF.  My div chief got chewed out.

So, lesson learned.  For my IPZ board, I merely provided my signed 1 BPZ PRF to my Sq/CC.  He probably added a few things and passed up to the group.  I didn't see it until it came back signed from the Wg/CC (not personally...hand delivered from the Exec) significantly watered down from my 1 BPZ.

Lo and behold, I was passed over.

1 APZ:  moved on to a joint job.  Took my 1 BPZ PRF, updated with some accomplishments from the past two OPRs, made a few adjustments and spoon fed to my Army supervisor.  It made it up the chain nearly unmolested.  No DP, but got picked up anyway (also wrote a letter to the board, but that is another story).

Going forward, If I'm ever in the position to have input into a subordinate's PRF, I, 1) do not intend to make them do their own, and 2), will not do it myself without giving them a heads up on what I'm putting down.

My lesson learned:  write your own stuff.  Make rank.  Fix it when you get there.  But, maybe I'm a bad person.

And you are talking about one subordinate. Try 6-10 officers for one CC. Nobody has all that time in the world to crank out PRFs unless you are a snacko.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, bennynova said:

6 to 10?? 

     Easy.  

Easy to crank out.  Tougher to do the stupid bullet checker in Excel, then edit, then re-edit, then edit the bullet-checker to match the edits to the PRF...

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
And you are talking about one subordinate. Try 6-10 officers for one CC. Nobody has all that time in the world to crank out PRFs unless you are a snacko.


That’s what ADOs are for.
  • Upvote 2

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
20 hours ago, Guardian said:

Let’s hear the other story

Not glamorous.  Got an LOA (the bad kind) on a deployment for some mostly harmless buffoonery, so came home dec-less. My OPR has already closed out and my next assignment was an AAD gig.  I didn’t think to put deployment bullets in my training report, but, due some creative AFI reading, I got it put into my OPR at the following assignment.

The letter delicately explained why there was an out-of-place bullet in my ROP.  I took the opportunity to attach the LOE/Form 77 from the deployment which had a ton of good stuff.

I don’t know if that made a difference, or the better PRF, but here I am.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Guardian said:

Ah. Makes sense. Interesting story. Want to exchange LOA stories over a beer?

Not sure it rates anything more than a Natty Lite.

I was going home early (for a year and a half at a sweet civilian grad school).  I had a bayonet for absolutely no good reason.  After my last convoy, in a fit of joy, I mounted it on my weapon and had people throw water bottles up while I tried to catch them.

Pictures were taken.

After I got on the plane home, some dudes got caught in some buffoonery of their own.  They thought if the turned me in, it would save their stripes.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
48 minutes ago, Weezer said:

Not sure it rates anything more than a Natty Lite.

I was going home early (for a year and a half at a sweet civilian grad school).  I had a bayonet for absolutely no good reason.  After my last convoy, in a fit of joy, I mounted it on my weapon and had people throw water bottles up while I tried to catch them.

Pictures were taken.

After I got on the plane home, some dudes got caught in some buffoonery of their own.  They thought if the turned me in, it would save their stripes.

Holy shit.

LOA club checking in: do you guys have an exclamation point after 'you are hereby admonished'? Always thought that was rather comical.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
25 minutes ago, Day Man said:

Holy shit.

LOA club checking in: do you guys have an exclamation point after 'you are hereby admonished'? Always thought that was rather comical.

Screen shot or it never happened.  I'm sure leadership was more than happy to sink your ass.  I say that with all of the best intentions. If I were to guess, the guys who signed that LOA had minimal experience in the 17. Just a guess based on the WG and OG CC's I had in AMC/AETC.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites


That’s what ADOs are for.

No more ADOs in the CAF.

I’m at a certain PACAF fighter base where every FGO in the OG is either a DO or CC, and we are sub-80% manned.
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
32 minutes ago, Ram said:


No more ADOs in the CAF.

I’m at a certain PACAF fighter base where every FGO in the OG is either a DO or CC, and we are sub-80% manned.

Truth. It’s not just your base, it’s all of the bases. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, Day Man said:

Holy shit.

LOA club checking in: do you guys have an exclamation point after 'you are hereby admonished'? Always thought that was rather comical.

Per the usual.  I think it has to be in there or it doesn’t hold up in court.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Holy shit.
LOA club checking in: do you guys have an exclamation point after 'you are hereby admonished'? Always thought that was rather comical.
My LOC and LOR both had them. Hard to keep a straight face reading it
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, Ram said:


No more ADOs in the CAF.

I’m at a certain PACAF fighter base where every FGO in the OG is either a DO or CC, and we are sub-80% manned.

Checks. Our FTU just sent our last DO to school. He was a major from the '06 year group.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Checks. Our FTU just sent our last DO to school. He was a major from the '06 year group.

 

Wow, well I guess this will hit AFSOC soon enough.

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Well, there are still ADOs.   They're just mid level captains nowadays.  Plus the SQ execs are Lts, so no need to study the jet or tactics. 

  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 minutes ago, snoopyeast said:

Plus the SQ execs are Lts, so no need to study the jet or tactics. 

True story, although when you can’t do a steep turn without stalling because decreasing UPT/FTU syllabus gives us dudes without the simple things like a crosscheck...maybe tactics are a bridge too far. 

 

Anecdote: our weapons shop are all brand new LTs aside from the patch(es). Keeps it interesting. 

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

The other patches are all up exec-ing at the group and wing.    I've been TDY to three wings this year and all of them had a patch as the wing exec.   

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The other patches are all up exec-ing at the group and wing.    I've been TDY to three wings this year and all of them had a patch as the wing exec.   


How does that qualify as their required tiered jobs? What a waste!
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Skitzo said:

 


How does that qualify as their required tiered jobs? What a waste!

 

Definitely doesn’t, but MAJCOM/A3 is apparently more worried about career progression on paper.

C7B15F71-A665-4C99-AB04-801290CF2B01.thumb.png.b90a119a78ba3889ba5ddb27f14b37ed.png

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, SurelySerious said:

True story, although when you can’t do a steep turn without stalling because decreasing UPT/FTU syllabus gives us dudes without the simple things like a crosscheck...maybe tactics are a bridge too far. 

 

Anecdote: our weapons shop are all brand new LTs aside from the patch(es). Keeps it interesting. 

Hell, at least those LTs are learning something.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
8 hours ago, snoopyeast said:

Well, there are still ADOs.   They're just mid level captains nowadays.  Plus the SQ execs are Lts, so no need to study the jet or tactics. 

For the love of god, can the CSAF just come out and straight up ban the use of a pilot as an executive officer and call it fraud, waste and abuse?  Go back to having MPF officers sit exec.  Heck they would do a better job.  

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
49 minutes ago, dream big said:

 Go back to having MPF officers sit exec.  Heck they would do a better job.  

They were all RIF'd 6-9 years ago. True story...our section commander gave the AF the middle finger and became an armor officer in the Army...it worked out pretty well for him.

  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
54 minutes ago, dream big said:

For the love of god, can the CSAF just come out and straight up ban the use of a pilot as an executive officer and call it fraud, waste and abuse?  Go back to having MPF officers sit exec.  Heck they would do a better job.  

I have a buddy at AFPC. Good luck finding officers or enlisted to do anything. We are short on officers period. Maintenance, cyber,  intel, medical, and the list goes on and on of career field shortages for officers. Why are we short? 70% of men and women ages 17-24 are ineligible to join right now because: out of shape; have medical issues; an arrest record; can't pass fitness test; do drugs; just can't pass the required aptitude tests; keep forcing the square peg into the round hole.

Edited by HarleyQuinn
  • Like 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
10 hours ago, Skitzo said:

How does that qualify as their required tiered jobs? What a waste!

 

"WIC is a leadership schoolhouse disguised as a tactics course."

While I agree with that statement, Big Blue, according to how they promote and develop people, appears to believe that leaders come from Exec offices, not cockpits.  Therefore, your best tactical leadership should go to exec offices in order to get promoted.

Epic. Failure.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 1

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



×