Dogs-N-Guns Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 They were supposed to post the list to myPers by 1400 yesterday and I still haven't seen it, so I wouldn't expect to see vMPF updates anytime soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Vandall Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 From AF Portal: "Public release of the CY17A Colonel (MSC), Lt Col (LAF/MSC) and Major (MSC) Central Selection Boards will be Tuesday, 23 May, 1400Z (0900 CDT). AFPC will post the select lists on myPers by 1200 CDT on 24 May." They've given themselves until Noon Central time to post the list on myPers. The myPers site doesn't seem to want to load up at the moment though. It's being overwhelmed with the MSgt promotion release list. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dogs-N-Guns Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 ... and it was just posted. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Vandall Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 13 minutes ago, Dogs-N-Guns said: ... and it was just posted. Speak of the devil! Checking it out now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matmacwc Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 Heard Seymour Johnson was a bloodbath, any truth to it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrizzell Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 (edited) 23 hours ago, jrizzell said: Two pilots at my location; both 1APZ, neither promoted are both being involuntarily separated...Makes sense seeing as how we have a pilot shortage Gents, Update, I shit you not. I guess at the HAF whomever was in charge of creating the involuntarily separated notification memos went through the promotion spreadsheet and created them for anyone whom was passed over 1APZ. Our CC called yesterday and did some digging and helped discover the complete breakdown in process. They should be getting their continuation letter shortly...Unbelievable Edited May 24, 2017 by jrizzell Clarification 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClearedHot Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 7 minutes ago, jrizzell said: Gents, Update, I shit you not. I guess at the HAF whomever was in charge of creating the involuntarily separated notification memos went through the promotion spreadsheet and created them for anyone whom was passed over APZ. Our CC called yesterday and did some digging and helped discover the complete breakdown in process. They should be getting their continuation letter shortly...Unbelievable Completely believable given the absolute dysfunction we see today...I wonder what the Shoe promotion rate was... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFM this Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, jrizzell said: Gents, Update, I shit you not. I guess at the HAF whomever was in charge of creating the involuntarily separated notification memos went through the promotion spreadsheet and created them for anyone whom was passed over 1APZ. Our CC called yesterday and did some digging and helped discover the complete breakdown in process. They should be getting their continuation letter shortly...Unbelievable Buuuuullllsshiiit I would take that non-continuation letter, frame it in carbonite, send copies to an attorney, the Washington Post, and an unnamed trusted agent in case I were to befall "an unfortunate event", and demand my separation pay under threat of contacting all 535 congresscritters. Their fuckup. They own it. #PayUp Edited May 24, 2017 by BFM this 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Vandall Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 I think anyone forced out through the continuation board process is actually entitled to TERA. I had created a previous post about it, but because I had included a link in the post it required moderator approval. So, here's the info: Under Title 10 Code 632, Paragraph (2), Section (a), if a member is forced to separate due to being twiced passed over for promotion (and not continued as under Code 637 of Title 10), then the member: if he is eligible for retirement under any provision of law, be retired under that law on the date requested by him and approved by the Secretary concerned, which date shall be not later than the first day of the seventh calendar month beginning after the month in which the President approves the report of the board which considered him for the second time; You can look it up yourself by searching for Title 10 Code 632. Cornell University is a good site for it. As the results of the board were reported in May, then members are required to leave service by 01 December of this year. As TERA is enacted by Congress (and therefore a law), then anyone separated after their 15 point is entitled to TERA. ALSO, big update. According to the DFAS website TERA is extended through 01 December 2025. I'd post the link, but just search for "temporary early retirement authority DFAS" in Google. The DFAS page was updated on May 15th. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skitzo Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 Completely believable given the absolute dysfunction we see today...I wonder what the Shoe promotion rate was...If that is true, I would think that this person should get some paperwork. But they won't. Fail a PFT however, that's serious business. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
schokie Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 1 hour ago, The_Vandall said: I think anyone forced out through the continuation board process is actually entitled to TERA. Anyone going to press to test on this one? Sounds like some barracks lawyer story that Big Blue will be quick to crush. But it would be sweet justice to see someone out-shoe the shoes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blahblah Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 FNG Here, good gouge and just wanted to contribute.... I was 2 BPZ w/DP and a #1/5 eligible from a 2 star, did not make it.... not a rated guy, 6X type. I do have a 2 APZ guy that works with me, rx'd his continuation letter with no issues. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jrizzell Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 2 hours ago, The_Vandall said: I think anyone forced out through the continuation board process is actually entitled to TERA. I had created a previous post about it, but because I had included a link in the post it required moderator approval. All I can speak to is my experience, when I was offered continuation, that was it. I had no choice between that or TERA. You could be correct; however it seems like the AF essentially tells you what your option is. You can take it or leave without anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LookieRookie Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 (edited) 2 minutes ago, jrizzell said: All I can speak to is my experience, when I was offered continuation, that was it. I had no choice between that or TERA. You could be correct; however it seems like the AF essentially tells you what your option is. You can take it or leave without anything. He's saying if you're denied continuation you can TERA. Edited May 24, 2017 by LookieRookie Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Vandall Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 He's saying if you're denied continuation you can TERA.Thanks! I guess I wasn't very clear. Yeah, what I meant was that if you are not offered continuation then you may be allowed to opt for TERA. Sent from my R1 HD using Baseops Network Forums mobile app Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennynova Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 This mess up sounds like it is 100%the fault of the personnel department at the senior raters location. They are given the spreadsheet with the results. Another document lays out what continuations are offered and gives 7 or 8 templates. It all a hodge podge of a mess. But it's. It really big AFs fault that the personnelist couldn't take the time to do their job correctly some people were further comtinued (to 24 years) some were continued to 20. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BashiChuni Posted May 24, 2017 Share Posted May 24, 2017 god damn i can't wait to be done with my ADSC... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaded Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 6 hours ago, BFM this said: Buuuuullllsshiiit I would take that non-continuation letter, frame it in carbonite, send copies to an attorney, the Washington Post, and an unnamed trusted agent in case I were to befall "an unfortunate event", and demand my separation pay under threat of contacting all 535 congresscritters. Their fuckup. They own it. #PayUp This is the best. I hope someone (everyone) does this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The_Vandall Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Simply incredible. Reminds me of the movie "Inception". With that letter, the Air Force created an idea, even in the minds of people who might have stayed in, that "The AF is done with me and I am done with the AF." I wonder how many came to accept that idea before the reversal.Having survived through cuts beginning back in 2006...I think a lot of folks have been keeping "options" warmed up on the back burner. An officer would have to be pretty thick-skulled and naive to not be ready with an alternative or two in regard to their service in the AF.Sent from my R1 HD using Baseops Network Forums mobile app 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dream big Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Apparently this was a blood path for rated eligibles in many bases...wtf. Is this some big conspiracy to force people out who might have stayed thus fluffing their arguement for stop loss?! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matmacwc Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 If you have been passed over, get the F out and find something else. It's like holding on to a high school girlfriend that breaks up with you when you go to college, its all good in the end. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bender Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Looked like 122 BTZ, all selects; 59 I/APZ selects out of 1101 I/APZ promotes. Feels like we're short on pilot Generals, not just pilots.Gotta get them to that pole year,BendySent from my iPhone using Baseops Network Forums Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bennynova Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Most bpz are usually 11s and 12s which would minimize the IPZ the following year. Makes sense to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pawnman Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 So, just saw elsewhere that the overall rate to Lt Col was 72.1%. (unofficial, of course). But what was disheartening to me, personally, was that the rate for 12B was about 50% (56% for B-52, 47% for B-1). This, despite the fact that every B-52 and B-1 squadron is short more 12Bs than 11Bs. I guess they're already starting to phase us out for the B-21. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panchbarnes Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 At least one non-rated select on the list is toxic and unqualified. Very disappointing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now