Jump to content

Aviation Continuation Pay (ACP - The Bonus)


Toro

Recommended Posts

Yea I agree in the recent article general everheart talked about "trying" to do some of the things we have been talking about for decades. I read a 1989 ACSC paper about pilot retention that was pretty hilarious. But the things he offered were short of what needs to be done. One example is the shift from 2-3 yrs to 3-4 yrs. That's nothing! How about 5-7 yrs at the same base? That's a real change. I was at my previous base 4 yrs, so how is this a big change?? I truly feel they are not full into the change mindset yet. Because if they were the second Gen grosso told the congressional committee on CSPAN in may that the AF was over 1500 pilots short and getting shorter the other branches generals would have been excused and the rest of the hour would have been spent on real talk not talking points....2019 is my decision year and I'm really amazed of how much talk is happening but nothing in the flying Sqs really are changing. But time will tell. Leadership doesn't need to be stingy right now on any front. More CSS troops, more bonus, more time on station, and less non flying deployments for pilots. Or the exodus will continue. CNN: Airlines are projecting hiring 5800 new pilots per year for the next 20 years.....
5,800? Was that a typo? The number is a hell of a lot larger than 5,800. I had thought it was upwards of 30,000.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Gazmo said:
On 7/30/2017 at 8:51 PM, sling-it-17 said:
 CNN: Airlines are projecting hiring 5800 new pilots per year for the next 20 years.....

5,800? Was that a typo? The number is a hell of a lot larger than 5,800. I had thought it was upwards of 30,000.

Per year?  5,800 might be a little low if you count EVERY airline, but the big 6 are good for around 4k/yr.  Certainly nowhere near 30k/yr.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, sqwatch said:

Why is it so frowned upon to want to be a leader? Why is it assumed that if you do want to go in that path, you're a back stabbing knob bobber?

 

The issue isn't wanting to be a leader, its dudes bending over backwards to check boxes and play the game when they should be studying and becoming lethal in their airframe as Capts. I've seen FAIPs/wingmen burning midnight oil to finish their AAD and people climb all over each other to be the Asian Pacific Islander month POC, no shit. 

We want leaders. We don't want tools who just play the game. The best solution: change the game.

  • Like 2
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/31/2017 at 4:43 PM, Dogs-N-Guns said:

 

Two categories, Long (>5 years) and Short. There are roughly and equal number of both for the FY17 contracts, but those numbers combined are dwarfed by the early-signers. With less than 70 days in FY17, it doesn't appear that the new bonus had any effect, unless people are just waiting for the last minute.

Well, there wasn't a lot of "wow" to it, IMO.  They didn't even correct for inflation from the last time the bonus changed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, matmacwc said:

The CAF porch page on FBook just put an update about dudes who have run out or didn't take can now take it.  Don't.

Yeah, no joke! Don't fall for it gents. Big Blue sure didn't care about the bonus or retention for what? The last 20 or so years. Now they are freaking out and the fact that we are all bailing is not going to make life better for those who stay. It's a trap!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 hours ago, sqwatch said:

Why is it so frowned upon to want to be a leader? Why is it assumed that if you do want to go in that path, you're a back stabbing knob bobber?

 

It's not frowned upon.  However history has shown us in the USAF that being good in your AFSC, especially in the rated world, is sometimes synonymous with being a good leader.  Are there exceptions?  Sure.  However not being good in your AFSC, especially in the rated world, is synonymous with being a terrible leader.

If you want to be a leader as a young punk, go for it, you had just better be great in your AFSC.  It's the "well make sure you only fly once a month so you can be the OG or Wing Exec" type mentality that people are tired of.  People are tired of the less talent getting the promotions and self-describing themselves as "leaders" and Commanders.  The talent right now is leaving the USAF.  The people who are less talented and/or too close to retirement are the ones that stay.  The less talented ones are the ones who are scared to get out, and then try to guilt trip and scare other people to stay in.  They're scared because they know they won't do well in the post-USAF world.   

Want to look at leadership?  Look at Apple.  That company invests a TON of time and energy developing people as leaders.  I've even had a great Wing Commander when I was stationed at Altus who learned a lot about leadership during his fellowship in Cupertino.

http://www.af.mil/About-Us/Biographies/Display/Article/988062/brigadier-general-william-a-spangenthal/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, SnapLock said:

Yeah, no joke! Don't fall for it gents. Big Blue sure didn't care about the bonus or retention for what? The last 20 or so years. Now they are freaking out and the fact that we are all bailing is not going to make life better for those who stay. It's a trap!

We did it to ourselves by telling anyone who would listen that it wasn't about the money.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Azimuth said:

It's not frowned upon.  However history has shown us in the USAF that being good in your AFSC, especially in the rated world, is sometimes synonymous with being a good leader.  Are there exceptions?  Sure.  However not being good in your AFSC, especially in the rated world, is synonymous with being a terrible leader.

If you want to be a leader as a young punk, go for it, you had just better be great in your AFSC.  It's the "well make sure you only fly once a month so you can be the OG or Wing Exec" type mentality that people are tired of.  People are tired of the less talent getting the promotions and self-describing themselves as "leaders" and Commanders.  The talent right now is leaving the USAF.  The people who are less talented and/or too close to retirement are the ones that stay.  The less talented ones are the ones who are scared to get out, and then try to guilt trip and scare other people to stay in.  They're scared because they know they won't do well in the post-USAF world.   

Want to look at leadership?  Look at Apple.  That company invests a TON of time and energy developing people as leaders.  I've even had a great Wing Commander when I was stationed at Altus who learned a lot about leadership during his fellowship in Cupertino.

http://www.af.mil/About-Us/Biographies/Display/Article/988062/brigadier-general-william-a-spangenthal/

I agree and disagree. Yes, we want the best at what they do to be our leaders, but I think we are missing a step. Just because someone is good at what they do doesn't mean they will be a good leader. Frankly, I think this is part of the reason why we are in this mess. From my observations we have ended up three types of leaders in the Air Force. 1. Those who suck in the jet but knew how to play the game and checked the right boxes. These types are often group or wing execs when they hit their promotion board. 2. Highly competent and tactical aviators who look good on paper. However, sometimes these types are arrogant and are climbing the ladder. These are the ones who throw their people under the bus to get where they want to go. These are often the toxic leaders. 3. Competent and tactical aviators and leaders who get it right. In my experience these are the ones I want to follow, but they are becoming more and more rare.

Part of the reason why I punched is because of the leaders. I got really sick of having commanders that thought that their sh!t didn't stink.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The bonus PSDM was corrected again today (change 3) and now includes bonus options for non-contracted and contract-expired aviators. Maybe someone out there is listening finally...

Not sure on the ROE of posing the actual doc here but it's out there on the portal...PSDM 17-39 corrected 4 Aug 17.

New Details

  • Tier 1 (11Fs) who never entered into a bonus contract and UPT ADSC is expired: 5, 9 or up to 24 YAS payments of $35,000 per year
  • Tier 1 previously signed a bonus contract that is expired: contract at min up to 22 YAS and max 24 YAS @ $35K
  • Tier 2 (11B/11S/11M) who never entered and UPT ADSC expired: 5 or 9 years @ $30K
  • Tier 2 previously signed but expired: same as Tier 1 but @ $30K
  • Tier 3 (11R/11H) who never entered and UPT ADSC expired: 5 years @ $28K
  • Tier 3 previously signed but expired: same as Tier 1 but @ $28K
  • Tier 4 (11U/12U/13U/18X): 5 years @ $35K if UPT/URT ADSC expires in FY17
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wish instead of 9, they offered a bonus to 20 years service. As I was casual for a year, 9 would take me to 21. I don't want to stay to 21, but I don't really want to leave 120k on the table by only taking the 5

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ihtfp06 said:

I wish instead of 9, they offered a bonus to 20 years service. As I was casual for a year, 9 would take me to 21. I don't want to stay to 21, but I don't really want to leave 120k on the table by only taking the 5

Hope you had fun during that casual year!  Because it looks like you blew about $10k a month doing it! hahaha.  That's a shitload of hookers and blow.  Or so I've heard.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 3
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hope you had fun during that casual year!  Because it looks like you blew about $10k a month doing it! hahaha.  That's a shitload of hookers and blow.  Or so I've heard.

I hate you.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, nsplayr said:

The bonus PSDM was corrected again today (change 3) and now includes bonus options for non-contracted and contract-expired aviators. Maybe someone out there is listening finally...

Not sure on the ROE of posing the actual doc here but it's out there on the portal...PSDM 17-39 corrected 4 Aug 17.

New Details

  • Tier 1 (11Fs) who never entered into a bonus contract and UPT ADSC is expired: 5, 9 or up to 24 YAS payments of $35,000 per year
  • Tier 1 previously signed a bonus contract that is expired: contract at min up to 22 YAS and max 24 YAS @ $35K
  • Tier 2 (11B/11S/11M) who never entered and UPT ADSC expired: 5 or 9 years @ $30K
  • Tier 2 previously signed but expired: same as Tier 1 but @ $30K
  • Tier 3 (11R/11H) who never entered and UPT ADSC expired: 5 years @ $28K
  • Tier 3 previously signed but expired: same as Tier 1 but @ $28K
  • Tier 4 (11U/12U/13U/18X): 5 years @ $35K if UPT/URT ADSC expires in FY17

12Bs, continue to fuck off.  The bonus they did release this year included exactly 4! people in my airframe.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SurelySerious said:

24?

IIRC it was 24 12Bs overall... Take out two that belong to AFMC, and adjust for the fact that the B-52 community has 133% as many squadrons as B-1s and 150% as many 12Bs per crew, I could easily see there only being 4 bonus-eligible B-1 WSOs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ok, I'll be the dick and ask the question. I get the job that WSOs do in the Mudhen and Buff, but why the outcry for the rest of them?  I know a C-130 nav who openly admits that a tight platform makes their primary job irrelevant. Is there demand for 12X outside the AF?  Is this bonus anger about "fairness" or supply/demand?

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, BashiChuni said:

A good U-28 CSO is worth their weight in gold

 In that case I'll alert my bank to expect an incoming wire of $3,431,764.34 very soon :flag_waving:

2 hours ago, Lord Ratner said:
3 hours ago, BashiChuni said:
A good U-28 CSO is worth their weight in gold

But do we need to financially incentivize then to stay?

There is a 12S bonus, so the AF says yes. My opinion is that all bonuses should have been open to free agents from the start rather than just FY17 UFT-expiring folks, so while I'm glad they're adjusting for some bonus tiers, I'd like to see that apply across the board. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Lord Ratner said:
3 hours ago, BashiChuni said:
A good U-28 CSO is worth their weight in gold

But do we need to financially incentivize then to stay?

People need to realize there is more outside the AF than just the airlines.  I know of several former Nav/WSOs that got out and are working for Fortune 500 companies making more than a commercial pilot ever will, though they do work more than half the month.

The cost to train an F-15E WSO is only different from pilots in UPT vs UNT and a few TR sorties in the B-course.  Everything else is the same, for the millions invested a financial incentive makes sense to retain 12Fs.  Especially the instructor corps that is badly undermanned, but since AFPC doesn't see the difference between an MQ student and an evaluator, they say their manning is fine, undermanned, but fine.  

The real issue here is when people say it isn't about the money, they mean it isn't just about the money.  Now that the AF has decided to use money as a show of relative value, the 12Fs are rightfully feeling extremely undervalued compared to us vaunted 11Fs.  This crisis has a lot of push and pull factors.  The airline pull may not be there, but there is certainly the AF push of 60-hr workweeks, lack of mission focus, endless queep and the joke of mission support.  

I'm frankly surprised we get any WSOs to stay past their initial commitment.  Since most are still under 30 when their commitment is up, I'd bail and go get a top-tier education and kill it in the business world.  

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...