Jump to content

Aviation Continuation Pay (ACP - The Bonus)


Toro

Recommended Posts

My bro at a Reserve Viper squadron said they were having a hard time filling some full time spots. May be due to the fact that ARTs can't take mil leave.

You are talking about Hill, I have heard it as well. The reserves already have the part timers bonus, the guard is just around the corner, or so we are told. Time to get back in the saddle Beaver!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What I mean to say is, in the immortal words of George Clooney, "Damn! We're in a tight spot!"

- Due to AFPC and/or AF/A1M buffoonery, we used to just have shortages of 11Fs, 11Hs, 11Ss and 11Us--due to underproduction and/or community growth--but a surplus of 11Ms (which could backfill other communities in AETC, on staffs, etc.)

- Now, we have a circumstance wherein--as I perceive it--we don't (or soon won't) have any excess 11Ms to provide those backfills. Don't forget that the 12M community has also taken it in the shorts recently--so all the mobility aviator billets they might otherwise fill will also keep 11Ms in mobility jobs

- If the AFSOC situation described in an earlier post is accurate--nobody going to staff/MAJCOM staffers still flying the line--this might indicate how it is going/will go in other MAJCOMs

How a bill becomes a law:

1) Not enough 11Fs/11Ss/etc. to fill ops cockpits and staffs, so ops units get filled and staffs get shortfalled

2) 11M functionals refuse to give up bodies to backfill, because various force management initiatives have carrot-and-sticked any excess out of the service. Long-term trends aren’t much cause for optimism

3) ACC/AFSOC functionals are now on the horns of a dilemma: continue to shortfall staffs, which means they have even fewer people to advocate for their relative positions and/or build viable plans, or shortchange ops units and thus make it even harder to meet operational requirements?

4) My guess is that folks in the ops units will see even worse decisions come out of higher headquarters, while experiencing the same or worse ops tempo due to manning shortages. Folks in higher headquarters staffs will be all the more frustrated, because not only will they be overworked by virtue of being undermanned, but they’ll have to deal with even louder griping from the ops units, since they’ll be forced to push work down to wings/groups/squadrons that used to be done by MAJCOM staffs

Will opportunities to be released to staff improve? I dunno. I’m not sure you’ll want to go to staff, however, if the above dynamic is truly at work. The “good” news in such a scenario would be that, by process of elimination, your chances of making O-5 should be pretty good.

The Air Force appears to have taken a tough problem and made it intractable.

Edit: fixed ridiculously large font.

On the other hand, the more that gets pushed from the MAJCOM to the Wing, the more control the WG/CC has over mission execution. In theory, anyway.

Just curious, how does 12F/12B manning look? I know the 12Fs were undermanned, hence the bonus for them...but 12Bs were part of the last RIF (we lost three at my wing alone). What specific knowledge does an 11F/11B have that a 12F/12B doesn't have, from a functional perspective?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On the other hand, the more that gets pushed from the MAJCOM to the Wing, the more control the WG/CC has over mission execution. In theory, anyway.

Just curious, how does 12F/12B manning look? I know the 12Fs were undermanned, hence the bonus for them...but 12Bs were part of the last RIF (we lost three at my wing alone). What specific knowledge does an 11F/11B have that a 12F/12B doesn't have, from a functional perspective?

That dynamic can certainly hold true--perhaps, because the MAJCOM is too busy to meddle, they'll give the ops wings a bit more control. Having been in an overseas assignment where my unit was the only flying my MDS, I can say it was nice to have more input into MAJCOM Supps & such than would have happened in AMC, because those at the MAJCOM were too busy with other taskers. That said, it also meant that, because the MAJCOM and NAF were undermanned, the Wing got the "opportunity" to give folks in flying squadrons the unique experience of working in the CAOC, being the lead MDS rep for large theater exercises, and individual deployments to . . . well, everywhere. Will you get the chance to do some unique things, while still assigned at the Wing/below level? Sure. Will you be doing MAJCOM/NAF staffers' jobs for them, while your SURF only shows duties at the Squadron/Group level? Yep. Will it also further increase an already-painful ops tempo? Absolutely.

- I view it as unlikely that CAOC billets will get shortfalled, so I don't see how Wg/CCs will have any more control over combat mission execution than they did before. Perhaps Wings will be given more control over their training programs. I imagine they'll be given wide latitude in finding creative ways to use Sim's to accomplish training requirements

If you want specifics on 12B/12F manning, I suggest you talk to your Sq/CC or AFPC functional. I'm just trying to help folks follow the logical bouncing ball with regard to the second- and third-order effects of enticing/pushing 11 & 12Ms out the door. The last time I saw anything official on 12X manning was a few years ago. At the time--according to AFPC metrics--12Ms were overmanned, 12Bs & 12Rs were just about right, and 12Fs & 12Ss were significantly undermanned.

- From what I've read on this forum, it appears that the Air Force has "fixed the glitch" WRT 12Ms

- I would assume that CAF functionals would want to backfill 11F staff billets with 11 & 12Bs, 11 & 12Rs before taking 11 & 12Ms . . . which means that you go/have gone from being "right-sized" to being effectively undermanned

- The net effect of the Air Force apparently refusing to acknowledge the extent to which 11 & 12Ms have been backfilling other communities' billets is that the CAF community's net effective manning shortfall is/will be even worse

For the AFSOC community, again based on old data, both the 11 & 12S communities were hurting badly. Doesn't look like the CAF community is gonna be much help. The mobility side is or soon will be out of Schlitz.

I'd love to hear from General Chang, rtgators or anyone else with a clearer picture of current aviator manning. I'll willingly admit that I might be wrong in my outlook. Thus far, the silence from them/other senior leaders on this forum is deafening.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

You mean besides how to fly an airplane?

Is that a necessary skill at a MAJCOM headquarters? That's my point...WSOs can be mission leads, they act as flight commanders, shop chiefs, execs, directors of staff, even squadron and group commanders within the wings that ACC has control over. What special knowledge does the stick-and-rudder skills impart when it comes to staff jobs?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is that a necessary skill at a MAJCOM headquarters? That's my point...WSOs can be mission leads, they act as flight commanders, shop chiefs, execs, directors of staff, even squadron and group commanders within the wings that ACC has control over. What special knowledge does the stick-and-rudder skills impart when it comes to staff jobs?

A quick google search shows that we haven't had a CSAF who was a nav since...well, never. Gen McNabb (acting CSAF after Mosely) started as a nav and then several years later became a pilot. I'm just saying that at certain levels it must matter to somebody, though I'm sure it really depends on the job. The previous AFSOC CC was a nav.

Keep in mind that I'm a rotorhead (red-headed stepchildren) and we'll never have one of our own running the big show, so don't feel bad. Some of the best guys I have worked with and for have been navs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A quick google search shows that we haven't had a CSAF who was a nav since...well, never. Gen McNabb (acting CSAF after Mosely) started as a nav and then several years later became a pilot. I'm just saying that at certain levels it must matter to somebody, though I'm sure it really depends on the job. The previous AFSOC CC was a nav.

Keep in mind that I'm a rotorhead (red-headed stepchildren) and we'll never have one of our own running the big show, so don't feel bad. Some of the best guys I have worked with and for have been navs.

Oh, I have no aspirations to be CSAF...hell, even SQ/CC is likely out of reach, unless I end up as the FSS/CC or something. No, my question is that, with all the 11Ms currently filling 11F billets about to be pulled back to their cockpits/staff jobs within their own MAJCOM, why would ACC not bridge that gap with 12F/12Bs who have been there, done that, and have a pretty good grasp on daily flying operations and weapon employment?

Although TnkrToad hit the high points...we already don't have enough 12Fs to fill cockpits, hence the bonus, and 12Bs aren't much better, with just enough to fill cockpits. Can't say I'm looking forward to doing extra work for zero credit. I keep hearing leadership tell us that we won't be able to keep doing everything with our lack of resources...but I have yet to hear a task that I'm allowed to drop due to my lack of resources.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That dynamic can certainly hold true--perhaps, because the MAJCOM is too busy to meddle, they'll give the ops wings a bit more control. Having been in an overseas assignment where my unit was the only flying my MDS, I can say it was nice to have more input into MAJCOM Supps & such than would have happened in AMC, because those at the MAJCOM were too busy with other taskers. That said, it also meant that, because the MAJCOM and NAF were undermanned, the Wing got the "opportunity" to give folks in flying squadrons the unique experience of working in the CAOC, being the lead MDS rep for large theater exercises, and individual deployments to . . . well, everywhere. Will you get the chance to do some unique things, while still assigned at the Wing/below level? Sure. Will you be doing MAJCOM/NAF staffers' jobs for them, while your SURF only shows duties at the Squadron/Group level? Yep. Will it also further increase an already-painful ops tempo? Absolutely.

- I view it as unlikely that CAOC billets will get shortfalled, so I don't see how Wg/CCs will have any more control over combat mission execution than they did before. Perhaps Wings will be given more control over their training programs. I imagine they'll be given wide latitude in finding creative ways to use Sim's to accomplish training requirements

If you want specifics on 12B/12F manning, I suggest you talk to your Sq/CC or AFPC functional. I'm just trying to help folks follow the logical bouncing ball with regard to the second- and third-order effects of enticing/pushing 11 & 12Ms out the door. The last time I saw anything official on 12X manning was a few years ago. At the time--according to AFPC metrics--12Ms were overmanned, 12Bs & 12Rs were just about right, and 12Fs & 12Ss were significantly undermanned.

- From what I've read on this forum, it appears that the Air Force has "fixed the glitch" WRT 12Ms

- I would assume that CAF functionals would want to backfill 11F staff billets with 11 & 12Bs, 11 & 12Rs before taking 11 & 12Ms . . . which means that you go/have gone from being "right-sized" to being effectively undermanned

- The net effect of the Air Force apparently refusing to acknowledge the extent to which 11 & 12Ms have been backfilling other communities' billets is that the CAF community's net effective manning shortfall is/will be even worse

For the AFSOC community, again based on old data, both the 11 & 12S communities were hurting badly. Doesn't look like the CAF community is gonna be much help. The mobility side is or soon will be out of Schlitz.

I'd love to hear from General Chang, rtgators or anyone else with a clearer picture of current aviator manning. I'll willingly admit that I might be wrong in my outlook. Thus far, the silence from them/other senior leaders on this forum is deafening.

Tnkr,

Reserving judgment until final bonus take rates are posted. There are several ways to tackle the aviator staff issue, to include using a much greater percentage of non-rated officers in rated staff billets. This would be particularly effective at the higher staff levels (HAF, CCMD, JCS), where rated positions are "over coded" as such. As a result, flyers with HHQ/Joint staff positions will have it made come board time...it will become an even bigger distinguisher.

  • Downvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Oh Chang you are back and as transparent as ever hoping a " greater percentage of non rated officers [will be] in rated staff billets".

I admit it's not the most elegant solution, but if the determination is made this FY to drastically cut back on 11Ms in staff positions (and all other flyers, to boot) in order to avoid cutting back on readiness for the required missions, then yes, it's a workable solution. Not all flyers will lose opportunities...the cream will still rise to the top.

  • Downvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tnkr,

Reserving judgment until final bonus take rates are posted. There are several ways to tackle the aviator staff issue, to include using a much greater percentage of non-rated officers in rated staff billets. This would be particularly effective at the higher staff levels (HAF, CCMD, JCS), where rated positions are "over coded" as such. As a result, flyers with HHQ/Joint staff positions will have it made come board time...it will become an even bigger distinguisher.

...but the final bonus take rate is posted: per the FY14 Final Report posted on the AFPC website. 53% doesn't seem like cause for celebration.

-- Do you know something we don't? Is the final report not in fact final?

The AF has been doing its darnedest since at least the mid-90s to recategorize staff billets from 11X/12X to 16G, etc. Having been an 11M filling a billet that should have been an 11S, I am all to familiar with the notion of "better to have a marginally-qualified dude who is willing to learn than leave the seat vacant" philosophy. I have difficulty, however, seeing how further recategorizations which allow non rated folks to fill rated billets will be a net positive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...but the final bonus take rate is posted: per the FY14 Final Report posted on the AFPC website. 53% doesn't seem like cause for celebration.

-- Do you know something we don't? Is the final report not in fact final?

The AF has been doing its darnedest since at least the mid-90s to recategorize staff billets from 11X/12X to 16G, etc. Having been an 11M filling a billet that should have been an 11S, I am all to familiar with the notion of "better to have a marginally-qualified dude who is willing to learn than leave the seat vacant" philosophy. I have difficulty, however, seeing how further recategorizations which allow non rated folks to fill rated billets will be a net positive.

Not sure 53% will end up the final number...TBD...

Certainly, we dilute the diversity pool when we transfer more and more -11X/-12X billets to -16G...however, at the O-4 and O-5 levels, the majority of those individuals are mere action officers (very few branch chiefs, no div chiefs), so from a strategic perspective, the damage to the staff resulting from a lack of action officer diversity is very, very minimal. This will push more rated guys back into the cockpits, which is what most of you want anyway, if this BODN sample is representative of the whole.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I admit it's not the most elegant solution, but if the determination is made this FY to drastically cut back on 11Ms in staff positions (and all other flyers, to boot) in order to avoid cutting back on readiness for the required missions, then yes, it's a workable solution. Not all flyers will lose opportunities...the cream will still rise to the top.

1. "Opportunities" and "cream". Funny.

2. Can't wait for folks who have never seen the inside of a cockpit to start tinkering with my RAP tasking memo, 11-202 evaluation criteria, hours requirements for upgrade, or a host of other flying-related guidance that comes out of these staff positions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. "Opportunities" and "cream". Funny.

2. Can't wait for folks who have never seen the inside of a cockpit to start tinkering with my RAP tasking memo, 11-202 evaluation criteria, hours requirements for upgrade, or a host of other flying-related guidance that comes out of these staff positions.

Don't feed the troll brother.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure 53% will end up the final number...TBD...

Certainly, we dilute the diversity pool when we transfer more and more -11X/-12X billets to -16G...however, at the O-4 and O-5 levels, the majority of those individuals are mere action officers (very few branch chiefs, no div chiefs), so from a strategic perspective, the damage to the staff resulting from a lack of action officer diversity is very, very minimal. This will push more rated guys back into the cockpits, which is what most of you want anyway, if this BODN sample is representative of the whole.

Curious, then--from which non rated, yet operationally-minded career fields would these staff officers hail? Since you have much better insight, please do tell. Not trying be snarky--I just don't get how you see this working out in reality.

Force management programs skinnied down non rated career fields, too. If my Intel friends are to be believed, they have no excess capacity, either. The Space and Cyber communities don't exactly seem flushed with excess bodies. So, when AFRICOM has a Noncombatant Evacuation Operation to execute, can we expect that a Maintenance Officer is going to be the mobility/AFSOF subject matter expert? When EUCOM or PACOM plans its annual live/virtual/constructed theater exercises, is a loggie going to be the fighter SME in the white cell? If so, good luck with that. It seems more likely to me that, every time a EUCOM or AFRICOM contingency comes up, dudes at Mildenhall/Lakenheath/etc. will end up getting tasked with planning ops & exercises that should be done at the MAJCOM or NAF . . . and some poor schmuck from Kadena/Misawa/wherever will split his time between trying to fly the line/remain tactically competent, while doing double duty as the fighter SME for whatever PACOM calls its theater exercise(s). I guess the good news, in that case, is at least the guy in the PACOM example will rack up some good air miles and get to go to Hawaii a lot. Not a great formula, though, for tactical competence or a healthy family life.

As noted before, I don't see how, in the scenario you're describing, one avoids having the crap roll downhill in a big way to the Wings.

WRT to take rate, I'm still curious to hear how the FY 14 take rate can/will magically change. Even if it does, I assume it will have more to do with creative accounting than meaningfully different data. It seems more important to note that total pilot inventory decreased by 764. Any thoughts on how manning (and more importantly overall health of the force) is going to improve, given that airline hiring is up, take rates are decreasing, and (as far as I can tell) any excess pilot inventory exists in year groups that have yet to reach bonus eligibility?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You're asking for answers from a guy that didn't even know the take rate this year. He's not I the know; stop feeding the troll.

I hear what you're saying. While I'm interested to hear GC's response, the purpose of my previous post is as much/more to show folks on this forum how this really works. If GC provides value-added information, we'll all be the better for it. If not, it's still a whole lot better to address him with facts and logic than name-calling.

For what it's worth, I don't think folks should be terribly concerned about non flyers screwing with 11-2 series pubs. I'm pretty confident MAJCOM & NAF Stan/Eval & Training billets will be filled by qualified folks. The RAP issue shouldn't be something that's impacted by this dynamic . . . but given that I'm tanker dude, take this bit of my advice for what it's worth; I can't even spell RAP. What does concern me is Joint/HAF/COCOM/Theater SOC staffs being filled by folks who don't know what they're doing. The idea that we might not have a critical mass of operationally-savvy folks influencing policy decisions at the Joint & HAF level scares the crap out me. Bad tactical & operational decisions can lead to ugly consequences, but they're usually recoverable. Bad strategy and messed-up acquisitions, however, are awfully hard to unscrew. At the theater level and below, the Air Force can (and does) make up for staff inexperience/low manning by pushing crap downhill to Wings/Groups/Squadrons. Maybe this will help younger folks on this forum understand how/why some of their taskings come about. If you're an active flyer, better get used to doing HHQ staffs' jobs for them--even more so than you already do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you're an active flyer, better get used to doing HHQ staffs' jobs for them--even more so than you already do.

No thanks.

Task me all you want. Luckily, there's this thing called a "back burner."

Edited by Champ Kind
Link to comment
Share on other sites

No thanks.

Task me all you want. Luckily, there's this thing called a "back burner."

I hear ya', brother. Just to be clear--I'm not on staff, and I'm in no position to task any aviators on this forum. Just offering insight as one of those who the crap has rolled downhill onto at the unit level more times than I can count, and who has spent some time on HHQ staffs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

however, at the O-4 and O-5 levels, the majority of those individuals are mere action officers (very few branch chiefs, no div chiefs), so from a strategic perspective, the damage to the staff resulting from a lack of action officer diversity is very, very minimal.

Short sighted....

When a tasker comes down who do you think does the back ground research (including reaching out to bros) to present things to the decision makers? If an action officer doesn't remotely understand the problem, he won't even know where to begin asking questions. I'm a staff bitch major (finally understand what Rainman meant: brown rank is brown rank), but I know for a fact that if what I'm currently working on was tasked to a mobility dude someone at the WIC/A-10 FAM/A3J would end up doing a lion's share of the work. It's not a knock on AMC, those guys just don't have the perspective to understand the problem let alone know how to structure the possible solutions for the actual decision makers.

There are certainly plenty of action officer jobs that just need a motivated body, but many need someone with a back ground and/or connections to get up to date info and provide perspective. I understand that A1 has almost no options and hands are being tied at multiple levels, we're at rob Peter to pay Paul but don't down play the damage being done to Peter. Eventually robbing from Peter will fuck Paul.

  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...