Jump to content

Recommended Posts

49 minutes ago, torqued said:

Perfectly reasonable thing to say. I, too, would have targeted close Senate races. These close races typically occur in swing states.

So, if we were to attempt to manipulate a close senate race in a swing state, which of the below Senate races would you have targeted?

 

Screen Shot 2020-12-01 at 8.17.40 AM.png

 

Georgia?

At least Georgia.  But hell, if the dems have the resources to manipulate votes in ONLY tight races...why not Iowa, Maine, Montana, and South Carolina?

They only had to take one additional seat to take control of the Senate.  And yet somehow, with all the "widespread" fraud for president...they weren't able to flip one seat?

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 5.5k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

When MSNBC announced Trump's win in Iowa, there was an audible grunt from Rachel Madow. By the sound of it, she apparently sat on her sack wrong. Happens to the best of us.

Want to slash American carbon?  Build nuclear power plants.  

Found this entertaining Because screw that bitch and her "it's my turn" mentality. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Posted Images

4 hours ago, torqued said:

It seems to me you spent an inordinate amount of time diminishing his career instead of addressing his specific allegations.

I love it. You're "just asking questions" with some video of a cybersecurity expert for the disaster that is campaign trump, and I try to figure out if he's actually one because his claims are amazing.

I watch the video and tell you it's bullshit, and what he's briefing doesn't make sense.  Also, he's presented zero actual proof for what he claims. There's no information online about his expertise, and his background, as he presented it, sounds mad fishy.

Spent a hour trying to find information on him, and listening to the video.  But I'm just diminishing someone's career.  Well played, troll.  We're done.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
3 hours ago, pawnman said:

At least Georgia.  But hell, if the dems have the resources to manipulate votes in ONLY tight races...why not Iowa, Maine, Montana, and South Carolina?

They only had to take one additional seat to take control of the Senate.  And yet somehow, with all the "widespread" fraud for president...they weren't able to flip one seat?

Did you happen to look up the results for the states you listed?

It seems like you're suggesting 10% is a "tight" race.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, torqued said:

Did you happen to look up the results for the states you listed?

It seems like you're suggesting 10% is a "tight" race.

Did you happen to look up the numbers for Pennsylvania mail in votes?

It seems like you didn't because you replied by saying it's a "math problem" with no explanation.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 minutes ago, DosXX said:

Did you happen to look up the numbers for Pennsylvania mail in votes?

It seems like you didn't because you replied by saying it's a "math problem" with no explanation.

You want a math problem? 😆

What is 300,000 COVID deaths minus 200,000 COVID deaths? Think you can wrap your head around that one, Capt Calculator?

  • Downvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
31 minutes ago, torqued said:

You want a math problem? 😆

What is 300,000 COVID deaths minus 200,000 COVID deaths? Think you can wrap your head around that one, Capt Calculator?

You get the award for most cringe deflection 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Write up by the guy who wrote the spiderfoot tool that was so widely hailed as "proof" from the failed Trump Campaign.  Guess if he agrees more with COL Cybersecurity Expert, or your lowely, local cyber guy.

https://medium.com/@micallst/misusing-osint-to-claim-election-fraud-cfb89c858c3a

Relevant quote -
 

Quote

"Assuming the author of the affidavit was not intentionally misleading, the affidavit demonstrates a number of knowledge gaps that manifest in the other pitfalls laid out below. Had this fundamental knowledge been present in the author of the affidavit, I doubt it would have ever been written."

 

Link to post
Share on other sites
16 hours ago, FLEA said:

Ok to be fair, this is sort of a dumb question. If you were going to invest in fraud as a democrat, why would you waste you money on California or New York? You are obviously going to target swing states. 

Furthermore, if you were going to investigate fraud as a Republican, why would you do it in Ohio? A state you won. 

 

You're right I probably wouldn't invest in fraud in New York and Cali.. but I certainly would in Texas and Florida. Both of which trump won narrowly, and since he won, their vote counts were of course super duper perfect and secure. 
 

It sounds stupid because it is stupid. This is my whole point. If you, a sitting president with any integrity whatsoever, were concerned about widespread fraud and our overall election tampering, you would be investigating it everywhere.
 

Crying fraud only in the states where you narrowly lost looks an awful lot like slinging poop and hoping some of it sticks.  And maybe it looks like that because that's exactly what it is. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
13 minutes ago, Pooter said:

You're right I probably wouldn't invest in fraud in New York and Cali.. but I certainly would in Texas and Florida. Both of which trump won narrowly, and since he won, their vote counts were of course super duper perfect and secure. 
 

It sounds stupid because it is stupid. This is my whole point. If you, a sitting president with any integrity whatsoever, were concerned about widespread fraud and our overall election tampering, you would be investigating it everywhere.
 

Crying fraud only in the states where you narrowly lost looks an awful lot like slinging poop and hoping some of it sticks.  And maybe it looks like that because that's exactly what it is. 

Would you say POTUS was behaving more like this hippo or this gorilla? 

https://tenor.com/view/hippopotamus-hippo-poop-rapid-pooping-gif-16021276image.png

https://tenor.com/view/angry-poop-monkey-throw-mad-gif-17790027image.png

Edited by bfargin
  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
5 hours ago, pawnman said:

I wonder how many people in Trump's circle have to say it before Trump supporters believe it.

Barr will probably just be the next one in the administration to get canned like the last trump nominee who said the election was generally secure. You know.. as part of the completely normal administration turnover. 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
7 hours ago, pawnman said:

I wonder how many people in Trump's circle have to say it before Trump supporters believe it.

No reason to disbelieve Barr. Headline is misleading though, left out the "so far" part. The flipside to this is the Dems and MSM have been calling him Trumps personal hack lawyer for well over a year. Now that he said something they can grab on to, he's got credibility?  Politics as usual. 

Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, arg said:

No reason to disbelieve Barr. Headline is misleading though, left out the "so far" part. The flipside to this is the Dems and MSM have been calling him Trumps personal hack lawyer for well over a year. Now that he said something they can grab on to, he's got credibility?  Politics as usual. 

Are you joking?  He doesn't have any credibility, he simply demonstrates how everyone but Trump gets it...

Link to post
Share on other sites

You know, you can still be a Trump supporter while also realizing he lost the election due to being very unpopular.

But at some point, you’ll have to let it go. Trump himself will be working “the election was rigged” quibbles into every conversation he has for the rest of his life. Don’t lump yourself into that boat.

  • Like 1
  • Upvote 5
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 hours ago, torqued said:

You want a math problem? 😆

What is 300,000 COVID deaths minus 200,000 COVID deaths? Think you can wrap your head around that one, Capt Calculator?

I think you thought this was me lol. By the way, on the order of magnitude means something.

You're kinda goin off the rails, man.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
37 minutes ago, Negatory said:

I think you thought this was me lol. By the way, on the order of magnitude means something.

You're kinda goin off the rails, man.

Ah, shit. LOL. My fault. I got you and DosXX confused. You have the same positions. DosXX, my apologies. Negatory, I meant to insult you with that post. 😆

And I agree. These issues are somewhat important to me, but not enough to make permanent online enemies. I don’t want to go any further down that path. We’re only disagreeing on one or two issues. We’re not solving anything here.  I’m going to try and keep that in perspective.

  • Upvote 3
Link to post
Share on other sites

So, this had to be a thing - https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/12/01/no-kraken-refer-military-intelligence-unit.hmtl

Quote

A retired Air Force three-star general reignited baseless conspiratorial claims about U.S. troops' involvement in clandestine missions in the wake of the presidential election -- claims an Army official said are 100% false.

Also, Flynn (whose twitter handle is @genflynn...douche) is endorsing:

Quote

...declare a limited form of Martial Law, and temporarily suspend the Constitution and civilian control of these federal elections, for the sole purpose of having the military oversee a national re-vote.

So...yea.

Edited by 17D_guy
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...