Jump to content

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

Complete and utter malarkey. ONE mainstream network went after Obama, Foxnews, some of it unwarranted Political tripe, some of it valid.  Meanwhile ALL of the remaining mainstream networks suppor

Want to slash American carbon?  Build nuclear power plants.  

When MSNBC announced Trump's win in Iowa, there was an audible grunt from Rachel Madow. By the sound of it, she apparently sat on her sack wrong. Happens to the best of us.

Posted Images

https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/11/13/1012115/senior-us-election-official-trumps-misinformation-is-insulting/

 

This guy is the Trump nominee, unanimously confirmed by both sides of the aisle.  He calls the presidents false claims of voter fraud and "stealing the election" laughable, insulting, dangerous and an embarrassment.  Trump needs to do a better job picking his cronies if he's gonna make it in 2024.  Not official, but pretty dang close...  I'm sure this, too, is a communist thing to say...  Right out of the playbook, right?

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
19 minutes ago, Sua Sponte said:

What’s the over/under Trump pardons himself before leaving office?

Actually there was a lot of discussion earlier this year about what he can/can't do with a pardon.  I believe it was on lawfare.  Their podcast dug into the past, and if Nixon could pardon himself.  Think this was it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is zero evidence!!!!! Just shut up and accept it and don’t employ our constitution. Isn’t that a form of an ism? Accept what I say you should accept and don’t investigate.

https://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/opinion-columns/victor-joecks/victor-joecks-clark-county-election-officials-accepted-my-signature-on-8-ballot-envelopes-2182390/amp/

  • Downvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
14 minutes ago, 17D_guy said:

Actually there was a lot of discussion earlier this year about what he can/can't do with a pardon.  I believe it was on lawfare.  Their podcast dug into the past, and if Nixon could pardon himself.  Think this was it.

The only time he can’t is over his own impeachment charges, per the Constitution. And it was held you can pardon people of potential crimes when Ford pardoned Nixon.

Link to post
Share on other sites
5 minutes ago, Guardian said:

There is zero evidence!!!!! Just shut up and accept it and don’t employ our constitution. Isn’t that a form of an ism? Accept what I say you should accept and don’t investigate.

https://www.reviewjournal.com/opinion/opinion-columns/victor-joecks/victor-joecks-clark-county-election-officials-accepted-my-signature-on-8-ballot-envelopes-2182390/amp/

Better tell the authorities then.

Link to post
Share on other sites
35 minutes ago, Guardian said:

Thoughts on daily wire?
 

https://www.newsguardtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Daily-Wire-NewsGuard-Nutrition-Label.pdf 

Thoughts on Daily Wire? Garbage, untrustworthy stuff.  Don't take my word for it, look at the people that rate all the websites out there.  

Here, use this as a guide: https://www.newsguardtech.com/election-misinformation-tracker/

Before you complain newsguardtech.com is evil MSM, here's their list of financial contributors: https://www.newsguardtech.com/about/our-investors/

Edited by slackline
Link to post
Share on other sites

Thinking someone is a POS is a lot different than being a criminal. I think the evidence supports that Biden and his family are indeed a crime family. But he seems like a really nice guy that I would have a beer with unless you trigger himself his mentally reduced state. Then he gets scary.

Edited for lack of mastery of the English language.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
https://www.newsguardtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Daily-Wire-NewsGuard-Nutrition-Label.pdf 
Thoughts on Daily Wire? Garbage, untrustworthy stuff.  Don't take my word for it, look at the people that rate all the websites out there.  

I’ll read it. But I’d like your word for it. And why what he says isn’t correct or wrong or why daily wire is wrong. Haven’t seen too much that they have said that doesn’t fact check true.
Link to post
Share on other sites
https://www.newsguardtech.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/Daily-Wire-NewsGuard-Nutrition-Label.pdf 
Thoughts on Daily Wire? Garbage, untrustworthy stuff.  Don't take my word for it, look at the people that rate all the websites out there.  
Here, use this as a guide: https://www.newsguardtech.com/election-misinformation-tracker/
Before you complain newsguardtech.com is evil MSM, here's their list of financial contributors: https://www.newsguardtech.com/about/our-investors/

Didn’t see news guard tech say daily wire is bad anywhere. Your second added link to be clear.

But it was a pretty substantial document so I might have missed it.
Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Guardian said:


I’ll read it. But I’d like your word for it. And why what he says isn’t correct or wrong or why daily wire is wrong. Haven’t seen too much that they have said that doesn’t fact check true.

I made it easy for you.  Based on their score of 34.5/100, it's not worth taking the time to watch his videos.  I tried, but he has an awful lot of something you deride in his voice, emotion.  Couldn't finish it.  

Screen Shot 2020-11-13 at 8.05.44 PM.png

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Guardian said:


Didn’t see news guard tech say daily wire is bad anywhere.

But it was a pretty substantial document so I might have missed it.

It was really hard to miss...  Took up the entire right side of the screen.

All jokes aside, I miss easy stuff too from time to time.  Yesterday, I didn't know seadog's /s thing meant sarcasm...  We all miss stuff, no biggie, but I helped you out and pasted a pic of the rating...

Link to post
Share on other sites

I’m not on a computer. I’m on a phone. That doesn’t appear on my phone. Which is why I stated I don’t see it.

So you will make emotional arguments but when someone is using emotion to make their arguments you won’t listen and critique? Just use another source to say they are bad thus ignore it all together? Not saying that’s good or bad. Just trying to unemotionally Ascertain your position.

Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Guardian said:

She said "I'm going to release the kraken" and "this is a new American Revolution". Almost beyond parody levels of cringe.

I wrote a post here recently on the 'millions of shifted votes' from Dominion and how to debunk it yourself. Believing this means you would even have to believe that DHS cyber security agency is corrupt at all levels as well. If you're past that point I don't think much can be said to change your mind but you can respond to what I posted earlier if you're open to discussing it seriously. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah. That was cringe worthy! Regardless of which side your on. Made me laugh in a pitiful way. I missed your post. I wish I didn’t post ever 5 seconds because then I might be able to find it. If it’s not to much trouble I’m open to pm if you don’t want to repost. Very open to the discussion and thought exercise.

As for my wife going to Harvard.....what wife? No way son. No thanks.

  • Upvote 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.




×
×
  • Create New...