Jump to content

Army PR push: 'Average-looking women'


HeloDude

Recommended Posts

http://www.politico.com/story/2013/11/army-pr-push-average-looking-women-100065.html?hp=f3

Army PR push: 'Average-looking women'

“In general, ugly women are perceived as competent while pretty women are perceived as having used their looks to get ahead,” wrote Col. Lynette Arnhart, who is leading a team of analysts studying how best to integrate women into combat roles that have previously been closed off to them.

“There is a general tendency to select nice looking women when we select a photo to go with an article (where the article does not reference a specific person). It might behoove us to select more average looking women for our comms strategy.

I'm sure this will solve all the Army's problems.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Average women in a military setting quickly become hot, and therefore are not acceptable. The average army woman is less than average by civilian average standards which means ugly women will have to be hired in order to meet the average category of Army standards. If all women are civilian ugly, and therefore Army average, the new average will contain ugly women who are now Army standard hot. Conclusion, women can't serve in combat.

  • Upvote 8
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This whole discussion is going to lead to rape. I just know it.

LOL. THIS^

Who the fu*ck is running this circus? The Army can't be serious about preventing sexual assault or sexism when they are launching an entire PR campaign based on a woman's "looks." Why are they looking for "average looking" women when they can just look for the "average infantry chick" and put her on a poster...who gives a f*ck what she looks like if she can do the job. This just reemphasizes how the military just cares more about image rather than how good someone really is at their job. If anything, they just made it worse for hot chicks in the military who really are good at their jobs. Unless they look average, they couldn't have possibly made it to the top without "chowing some hog".

We'll do well in the next war...all of the Air Force posters have dudes with 32 inch waists....yeah, we're that good!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We only work in the binary scale, I thought?

Sort of, I think you could use this but with dollar bills. Get volunteers to be judges, give dollar bills to those deemed attractive and at the end of the day, the chicks with the fewest dollars win as the average women the Army wants, the chicks with the most dollars also win and are allowed to keep the cash. A win-win.

Edited by TreeA10
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sort of, I think you could use this but with dollar bills. Get volunteers to be judges, give dollar bills to those deemed attractive and at the end of the day, the chicks with the fewest dollars win as the average women the Army wants, the chicks with the most dollars also win and are allowed to keep the cash. A win-win.

This sounds like a survey that I've helped judge a few times. I also got two free drinks with my entry fee.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From what I usually heard, I was donating to a college fund. I'm good with that.

You can write that off on your taxes as charity right?....

If there is anything we don't need to be doing in the Army it's showing off our "average" female soldiers....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Col. Lynette Arnhart, who is leading a team of analysts studying how best to integrate women into combat roles that have previously been closed off to them.

I am honestly confused by this. Isn't training them properly and sending them to their jobs once competent the best way to integrate them into combat roles? I feel it is going to cause more of a stir being so public about it because you are drawing that much more attention to it. What are you going to do about attractive women in combat? Make everyone wear a mask until they're "part of the team" and then allow then to remove it?

how they should tell the press and public about the Army’s integration of women.

Not make a big deal out of it. Just let it happen.

For example, the attached article shows a pretty woman, wearing make-up while on deployed duty. Such photos undermine the rest of the message (and may even make people ask if breaking a nail is considered hazardous duty),” Arnhart said.

LMAO. So terrible jokes are a reason to pour money into researching how people react to stories about attractive/average women in military-related media stories? I cannot think of anything more detrimental to our progress and integration into the military than being so superficial and concerned about appearance. These women are not models flown out to remote locations for a PR campaign, they're military personnel doing their job. If Halle Berry fireman-carried a wounded soldier all the way back to base, would they select a picture of the average looking woman standing in the background instead? This makes no sense to me.

After POLITICO first reported on the e-mail in Tuesday’s Morning Defense, critics seized upon Arnhart’s guidance as proof that today’s Army culture has a long way to go before women will be treated as equals.

It might have something to do with fishing through pictures worrying whether or not the woman you want to display in your story is too attractive.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"... What are you going to do about attractive women in combat? Make everyone wear a mask until they're "part of the team" and then allow then to remove it? "

female-stormtrooper-costume.jpg

That'd be ok with me, but being a bunch of rapists and all, it'd just be a matter of time before...

6127040630_890a498781_z.jpg

And oh... Beep Boop

perfect-female-c-3po-waterproof2.jpg

Edited by F-15E WSO
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This just in...

http://www.armytimes.com/article/20131122/NEWS/311220041/One-officer-steps-down-second-suspended-over-pretty-soldiers-email

"Two colonels involved in a controversy over showing “pretty” female soldiers in Army communications no longer have their jobs, the Army confirmed Nov. 22. Col. Lynette Arnhart stepped down from her position heading the Army’s study on the integration of women into combat arms, and Col. Christian Kubik, who was the Training and Doctrine Command public affairs officer, was suspended."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


×
×
  • Create New...