Jump to content

FY 14 Force Management Program (RIF, VSP, TERA)


AOF_ATC

Recommended Posts

Anyone applying for the Palace Chase program? Is it running parallel with VSP? I'm curious if they will only be releasing the estimated overage per the matrix for the all the programs (PC, VSP, RIF) combined. Seems like a good deal with 1/1 payback.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyone applying for the Palace Chase program? Is it running parallel with VSP? I'm curious if they will only be releasing the estimated overage per the matrix for the all the programs (PC, VSP, RIF) combined. Seems like a good deal with 1/1 payback.

I was looking at applying for PC if they haven't notified us of VSP results by mid-March or so, but it looks like you apply using the same application process on vMPF. When I click on Separations, it takes me to my existing VSP application with no option to apply using another program. Hopefully, the timing will work out and we'll have results in the next few weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Longtime lurker, first time poster here. In the interests of disclosure: I am not rated. I found this board by accident in 2011, when I was trying to find any kind of intelligent discussion on the force management programs that year. This year is the first year I ended up being eligible for VSP, so I came back and have been happy to find that the discussion has kept up. I appreciate you all for your comments, I learn more from reading this board than my command, the A1 community and my functional combined. It's sad that this is where my information has to come from, but thank you nonetheless.

Given all that I have learned from you all, I wanted to share some tidbits that I have come across. Take them for what they're worth. This week in our staff meeting, our FSS/CC said that officer VSP packages will not be reviewed for at least two weeks. Apparently the Chief heard you all. The VSP packages are being held up while a package routes through A1 to look at waiving ADSCs for UPT. Finally someone realized that it isn't fair to have a blanket denial for VSP and then subject folks to the RIF. That's not saying that UPT ADSC's will be waived, but it is being looked at by the Air Staff.

Second, our functional works pretty closely with A1. He said that the initial overage matrix put out by AFPC aren't necessarily a lie, but in all probability they won't be the final number of cuts. Apparently A1 puts a worst case scenario for cuts out there at the beginning, knowing that isn't what's going to happen. In theory this is so that everyone is on notice that the cuts could be bad. It isn't lost on them that one of the effects of this is that people freak out about how bad the cuts will be and get out voluntarily. Expect the number of "overages" to drop.

Like I said, take these for what they're worth. Thank you all for putting this discussion out there.

  • Upvote 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Longtime lurker, first time poster here. In the interests of disclosure: I am not rated. I found this board by accident in 2011, when I was trying to find any kind of intelligent discussion on the force management programs that year.

Then how the hell did you find this board?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt there are very many wing kings who will check "yes".

It's only on the Sq/CC section....so far 1 guy I know has, same base different squadron...haven't been able to find anyone else in that squadron to see if its a blanket thing the CC was doing or if it was just for him.

Edited by tunes
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's only on the Sq/CC section....so far 1 guy I know has, same base different squadron...haven't been able to find anyone else in that squadron to see if its a blanket thing the CC was doing or if it was just for him.

Technically it is under the Unit Commander section which may or may not be a squadron commander. Either way, it surprises me that it isn't under the Wing Commander section.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt there are very many wing kings who will check "yes".

I applied and my SQ/CC checked "yes" to the excess to the mission question... I think the SQ/CC approval is only to show that (1) you're not ineligible because you're under investigation or in trouble, and (2) the mission won't grind to a screeching halt if you leave suddenly (i.e. at least one other person can fly the plane). My wing CC just said he supported my request (he just has a text box to type in). The SQ/CC has been very supportive so far. Status is waiting at BPO.

FWIW, the rumint I've heard is that UPT ADSC waivers must be approved by the SECAF, and AFPC hasn't submitted a set of VSP applications to her for approval yet. But it is expected that she's on board with the "master plan" (if there is such a thing) and when it comes time in a few weeks, she'll sign off on waiving UPT ADSCs to fix the overages and not RIF people without giving them a voluntary option first.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just returned from deployment and trying to get the most up to date rumors. What's the latest info about when people think results for VSP apps come out? I have seen a number of official comments saying this is NOT first come first served. Which means to me that I can apply in April and have the same chance as some one who applies in Feb... am I wrong? If I'm correct that means people will be waiting until summer to find out all at once when the window closes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still "referred to active duty Squadron....." If the enlisted applications are any indication mine will sit with Sq/CC until the quota is met or 1 May, whichever comes first. Maybe AFPC should have provided more guidance than "commanders will not delay applications." Might as well have given them the answer on how to play the system. For what it's worth if anyone is in a similar fix, MPS said CMS cases should get highlighted to the Wg/CC if they are inactive for more than 5 days. That's only if they involve pay though. Not sure how to get these labeled the same way.

Edited by lossofclocklossofdata
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Still "referred to active duty Squadron....." If the enlisted applications are any indication mine will sit with Sq/CC until the quota is met or 1 May, whichever comes first. Maybe AFPC should have provided more guidance than "commanders will not delay applications." Might as well have given them the answer on how to play the system. For what it's worth if anyone is in a similar fix, MPS said CMS cases should get highlighted to the Wg/CC if they are inactive for more than 5 days. That's only if they involve pay though. Not sure how to get these labeled the same way.

have you met with him to ask the status of your application? Make him tell you to your face that he's slow-rolling it, or conversely you calling him out may actually get him to act in a timely manner.

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wing King here today told us that he approved the 20 VSP's on the C-17 side and the 6 on the KC-135 side, however he said he added a statement in the application stating how many pilots he could afford to lose before it started to impact FTU production, and then how many pilots per year he couldn't produce above that number if they approved more VSP's.

But he was very fair, up front, and very respectable as a leader. Which seems to be rare these days.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Given all that I have learned from you all, I wanted to share some tidbits that I have come across. Take them for what they're worth. This week in our staff meeting, our FSS/CC said that officer VSP packages will not be reviewed for at least two weeks. Apparently the Chief heard you all. The VSP packages are being held up while a package routes through A1 to look at waiving ADSCs for UPT. Finally someone realized that it isn't fair to have a blanket denial for VSP and then subject folks to the RIF. That's not saying that UPT ADSC's will be waived, but it is being looked at by the Air Staff.

I hope the Chief is getting involved, but quite frankly, at this point even if he corrects things his credibility is out the window. Last December he and his "director of force management policy" made it clear that money, not ADSC commitments, would be the driving factor for how many folks would be let go voluntarily.

From the Air Force Times article linked below:

' “We’d love to get all this done by voluntary force shaping measures over a period of time. If we have the leeway based on budget decisions to do that, we’ll go that route,” Welsh said Dec. 13. '

' “This has pretty much every tool in our toolkit at our disposal, both voluntary and involuntary,” said Brig. Gen. Gina Grosso, director of force management policy, in an interview. “Our strategy is to use the max use of voluntary programs that we can. Everywhere where we’ve been able to incentivize people to leave monetarily, we’re going to.” '

http://www.airforcetimes.com/article/20131216/CAREERS/312160016/Leaders-push-voluntary-exits-trim-force

The fact now is he's only involved because the officer corps has called BS on his public comments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our squadron commander told the VSP applicants in the squad today that the AMC A3 is not currently waiving UPT ADSCs, and expect to get our applications turned down once they get to AFPC. He added that it could change in the future, but as of right now we are going to be denied. Pretty sweet.

Did anyone get similar words from their chain?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wing King here today told us that he approved the 20 VSP's on the C-17 side and the 6 on the KC-135 side, however he said he added a statement in the application stating how many pilots he could afford to lose before it started to impact FTU production, and then how many pilots per year he couldn't produce above that number if they approved more VSP's.

But he was very fair, up front, and very respectable as a leader. Which seems to be rare these days.

Wing King here today told us that he approved the 20 VSP's on the C-17 side and the 6 on the KC-135 side, however he said he added a statement in the application stating how many pilots he could afford to lose before it started to impact FTU production, and then how many pilots per year he couldn't produce above that number if they approved more VSP's.

But he was very fair, up front, and very respectable as a leader. Which seems to be rare these days.

Unless I'm missing something here, Altus is the only wing with 135s and 17s. I would think that losing 20 IPs at once would be beyond crippling.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...