Jump to content

AF Light Air Support Aircraft


Fud

Recommended Posts

LAA is all about partnering with underdeveloped nations in the “real” long war... The majority of the world can’t afford our F-16s, even when we give them away. LAA fills that gap and makes us more friends faster. All the other talk is second-order stuff.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, BashiChuni said:

Tank I disagree. The gunship guys running afsoc do not like or want light attack. Ac-130J with lasers is the savior. 

The AC mafia may not like or want Light Attack but the GO’s running AFSOC do.

AFSOC Light Attack mission set 1 is for Combat Aviation Advisor training, 2 is for AFSOC CAS, 3 is for AFSOC Advanced Advisors.  

Edited by Tank
Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, Tank said:

The AC mafia may not like or want Light Attack but the GO’s running AFSOC do.

AFSOC Light Attack mission set 1 is for Combat Aviation Advisor training, 2 is for AFSOC CAS, 3 is for AFSOC Advanced Advisors.  

This is for the most part a true statement but it comes with a caveat.  AFSOC & SOCOM leadership have been very clear that while SOF wants this capability they will not get ahead of Big Blue.  SOCOM wants the AF to pay for the basic iron on the ramp and they will pay for the SOF peculiar equipment on the aircraft.  SOCOM will not pay for the program in its entirety so if the AF doesn’t buy the iron AFSOC isn’t getting anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, DirkDiggler said:

This is for the most part a true statement but it comes with a caveat.  AFSOC & SOCOM leadership have been very clear that while SOF wants this capability they will not get ahead of Big Blue.  SOCOM wants the AF to pay for the basic iron on the ramp and they will pay for the SOF peculiar equipment on the aircraft.  SOCOM will not pay for the program in its entirety so if the AF doesn’t buy the iron AFSOC isn’t getting anything.

Also true...

There’s a capability gap that LA can fill in AFSOC. SOCOM & AFSOC leadership both know it.  

Hopefully Big Blue doesn’t f**k it up! 

Edited by Tank
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, BashiChuni said:

Knowing a deficiency exists does not equal wanting to fix it. 

Big blue has already fucked it up. We should have had this a decade ago. 

 

SOCOM wants to fix it, just not pay for it...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

SOCOM wants to fix it, just not pay for it...


Well you guys kinda own that left over taste for F’ing away what was going to be a 99% SOCOM asset with Spartan.

The Army Sherpa/intra theatre transport replacement was going to spend most of its life moving stuff and people for SOCOM. Nobody has forgotten that bad deal on the green side.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Tank said:

AFSOC Light Attack mission set 1 is for Combat Aviation Advisor training, 2 is for AFSOC CAS, 3 is for AFSOC Advanced Advisors.  

What’s the difference between CAA and Advanced Advisors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So we will buy 20, they will go to a single unit or something like the 6th SOS, they will fly them for 6.9 years, and much like the C-27/RC-26/MC-12 they will be transferred to OGA or boarder/coastal state ANG. They will fly them for 6-9 years until that unit gets MQ-9s, the LA will be mothballed and the AF can say they tried the LA experiment but it just wasn’t (fill in buzz word statement here). Another great opertunity pissed away. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Klepto said:

What’s the difference between CAA and Advanced Advisors?

The authorities granted to the pilots in regards to flying in combat with the PN personnel and the amount of training they both receive.

CAAs receive more specialized training and can be granted the authority to fly combat sorties in the PN aircraft with their PN counterpart.

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Tank said:

The authorities granted to the pilots in regards to flying in combat with the PN personnel and the amount of training they both receive.

CAAs receive more specialized training and can be granted the authority to fly combat sorties in the PN aircraft with their PN counterpart.

Tracking CAAs. I’ve just never heard of Advanced Advisors in AFSOC. I’m familiar with Air Advisors on the conventional side. Can you say what units employ Advanced Advisors?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Klepto said:

Tracking CAAs. I’ve just never heard of Advanced Advisors in AFSOC. I’m familiar with Air Advisors on the conventional side. Can you say what units employ Advanced Advisors?

Currently no Advanced Advisors in AFSOC.  AETC has the 81FS.  

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, FourFans130 said:

Why? Because that's hot.  How many prop strikes you think the FTU would log in a year?

None.

The first phase of training would be 15 dual and 20 solo hours in a Husky.

btw: the FTU is equipped with a fleet of Huskies...and the line for IPs is around the block.

 

 

 

...let me have my dreams dammit

  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The more I read about the A-37, the more I wonder why there aren’t more airplanes like it. The Scorpion is a good try, but it’s empty weight is almost that of an A-37 fully loaded.

By not using a turboprop, you have a convenient place for an internal gun and with the KC-46 we could go back to probe&drogue to easily add air refueling capability. With small FADEC turbofans from manufacturers like Williams, efficiency has to be much improved over the jets used in the A-37.

It makes me wish the AF hadn’t settled for the T-6 in the first place and had developed a Tweet replacement.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, MooseAg03 said:


It makes me wish the AF hadn’t settled for the T-6 in the first place and had developed a Tweet replacement.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Cessna did have a replacement.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cessna_526_CitationJet

It lost to the T-6 in the JPATS competition. Potentially apocryphal rumor I heard was the Navy demanded a turboprop.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guys that flew the A-37 that I've spoken to are quite honest that they felt very under-gunned and vulnerable in it.  Lots of power, very maneuverable, but not the steed they wanted to be riding when iron was in the air.

One I spoke to who had been both a Raven FAC and later flew the A-37 said he felt safer in the O-1!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...