Jump to content

AF Light Air Support Aircraft


Fud

Recommended Posts

They should threaten to give them to  Willow Grove, Hancock and Ellington if they want AD big blue to get off their ass.

That would be a helluva pimp slap to the AF from Congress but would probably get the message across

Just buy it AF and get it over with


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah but keep charging that windmill, you'll win someday, maybe...

- Break Break -

Has the USMC released any requirements for a light attack?  There have been mentions of a partnership with the Marines (and others) if the AF finally got to acquiring Light Attack...

https://www.defensenews.com/smr/federal-budget/2019/03/13/air-force-to-buy-handful-of-light-attack-planes-but-will-a-bigger-program-follow/

https://www.businessinsider.com/senate-gives-marine-corps-100-million-for-cheap-light-attack-aircraft-2018-6

Doubt they would have requirements that different than the AF's but you never know.  I would argue the original LAAR requirements are dated and new ones push to a more capable system (shamelless Scorpion plug) but anything official on what the Marines and other potential partners (Aussies) might want/need in LA?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Lol, they're just Rick Rolling us all at this point. Honestly I stopped caring what anyone in Big Blue leadership says about light attack, and I worked on the the project personally in my civilian job and was a big proponent in general.

While a light attack capability as an MWS flown by USAF crews could still do a lot of good around the world, it's a good idea that's peak time was probably about 15 years ago and we're pretty clearly now moving in a different direction as an Air Force.

My BL: RIP Light Attack, we hardly knew ye...

Edited by nsplayr
  • Like 1
  • Upvote 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, nsplayr said:

Lol, they're just Rick Rolling us all at this point. Honestly I stopped caring what anyone in Big Blue leadership says about light attack, and I worked on the the project personally in my civilian job and was a big proponent in general.

While a light attack capability as an MWS flown by USAF crews could still do a lot of good around the world,  It's a good idea that's peak time was probably about 15 years ago and we're pretty clearly now moving in a different direction as an Air Force.

My BL: RIP Light Attack, we hardly knew ye...

Maybe but maybe not... never underestimate the AF to finally do the right thing after 15+ years of doing the wrong thing.

The light attack requirement is there  and we should have years ago gotten into the lead on this, the Brazilians want to build one:

https://www.airway1.com/brazilian-company-wants-to-launch-light-attack-aircraft/

https://www.janes.com/article/87662/laad-2019-akaer-presents-conceptual-mosquito-multi-role-aircraft

Akaer_mosquito_01.jpg

Just a bit like the OV-10 but imitation is the most sincere form of flattery.

Light Attack should have segued into Light Fighter ala an F-5 or F-20 that would have been part of a family of compatible systems to deliver modern, relevant airpower effects at a reasonable cost to sell to our Allies and keep in our own portfolio.

Edited by Clark Griswold
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Whats intriguing to me is how we had a relatively robust light attack fleet during the cold war, at a time when a conventional war with Russia was the thing we were preparing for, then after the wall fell we got rid of all of our OV-10s, A-4s, A-7s, and half our A-10s and switched our CAS platforms almost exclusively to pointy noses when no near-peer enemies existed.

Then OEF & OIF rolls around and we have a situation where Vipers and Hornets are putting GBUs onto guys with AKs and trucks that cost less than a fin on said bombs. Seems like we went the opposite direction we should've.

  • Like 3
  • Upvote 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/26/2019 at 12:20 PM, Sketch said:

Whats intriguing to me is how we had a relatively robust light attack fleet during the cold war, at a time when a conventional war with Russia was the thing we were preparing for, then after the wall fell we got rid of all of our OV-10s, A-4s, A-7s, and half our A-10s and switched our CAS platforms almost exclusively to pointy noses when no near-peer enemies existed.

Then OEF & OIF rolls around and we have a situation where Vipers and Hornets are putting GBUs onto guys with AKs and trucks that cost less than a fin on said bombs. Seems like we went the opposite direction we should've.

Yup.

Mike Pietrucha proposed an anti-dote to this a couple of years ago:

RECLAIMING THE AIR ATTACK MISSION: A RADICAL RETURN TO A PROVEN SUCCESS

Good article and worth a read IMHO.

Light Attack Armed Reconnaissance (manned) is still a requirement but the environment has moved on from the COIN/LIC mission of the early 2000's  and while it may seem counter intuitive (or not depending on cynical you are about the AF) if the requirement(s) were updated to the current/projected operational environment and the solution to said requirement(s) were likely a bit more expensive but more capable, the AF might give it a second look.

When rebels or insurgents have modest conventional military capabilities as is becoming common in Grey Zone conflicts, the requirements are going up and if though it is bitter and frustrating, militarily participating in these conflicts to some capacity is often better/cheaper in the long run.   

In practical terms, a platform with:

Medum Strike, Multiple Sensors, Good Endurance, Good Speed, Good Survivability, Growth capacity and low to modest cost for high utilization over long conflicts. 

Nothing great but a lot of things done pretty good.  This would never be a silver bullet but a platform that will be relevant to a range of conflicts in capabilities delivered, threats it can defeat, reliability it can deliver with care and attention to cost.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 4 weeks later...
On 12/3/2018 at 7:05 PM, Tank said:

The bet is a bottle of scotch that AFSOC will have LAA by 2021.

3 hours ago, Tank said:

We’ll see what happens, but I think I’m enjoying your delicious scotch in 14 months.  I plan to drink it from a brown beret.

Edited by tac airlifter
  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

47 minutes ago, tac airlifter said:

We’ll see what happens, but I think I’m enjoying your delicious scotch in 14 months.  I plan to drink it from a brown beret.

Don’t do that... berets don’t hold crap for water. You’ll waste the scotch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I feel like that article kinda buried the lede....

Quote

The Air Force has said that funding for the initial AT-6 and A-29 buys will come out of the estimated $160 million in unspent funds that Congress appropriated for the effort in previous budgets. Congress has appropriated $200 million in total for the effort since it was announced in late 2016.

So the United States Air Force, the world-renowned King of spending taxpayer dollars, has been sitting on $160 million of unspent funds for Light Attack?  With some of those funds up to three years old? 

I think that's the most powerful piece of evidence showing that the Air Force does not care about Light Attack. 

Edited by Blue
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Blue said:

I feel like that article kinda buried the lede....

So the United States Air Force, the world-renowned King of spending taxpayer dollars, has been sitting on $160 million of unspent funds for Light Attack?  With some of those funds up to three years old? 

I think that's the most powerful piece of evidence showing that the Air Force does not care about Light Attack. 

You are surprised by this from a service that does so well at managing its pilot force?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...