17D_guy Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 2. My previous base wouldn't let us put EKIA in OPR/EPRs. Do you think it's because the number couldn't be confirmed? I've had the bosses who didn't want $200+/-, >$200, etc. Wonder if it's a stupid spin off of that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spur38 Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 The shoes don't bother me as much as the tampons they have to stuff up the ILS back course! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guineapigfury Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Do you think it's because the number couldn't be confirmed? I've had the bosses who didn't want $200+/-, >$200, etc. Wonder if it's a stupid spin off of that. We had excellent video of bad guys getting turned into meat, so I don't think it was confirmability. Neutralized, Hellfire Strike and such were all okay. I try to give leadership the benefit of the doubt. Maybe they're trying to reduce the number of acronyms on OPRs in order to help dudes out on their PRFs. 69% of the USAF probably thinks EKIA is a reasonably priced Korean car. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SurelySerious Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 69% of the USAF probably thinks EKIA is a reasonably priced Korean car. Wait, we fly airplanes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Learjetter Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 (edited) 2. My previous base wouldn't let us put EKIA in OPR/EPRs.This is most egregiously UNSAT. This line was the most powerful one considered on the recent promotion board I sat on. Edit: unless it was an acronym war...but the accomplishment was still described. No one should lose credit for closing with and killing the enemy on OPRs. Edited April 27, 2015 by Learjetter Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeA10 Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Instead of EKIA, you could rewrite that into the current PC language of the day. "Improved the lives of women and same sex couples by providing kinetic education with a 100% guaranteed non-recidivism rate." 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SuperWSO Posted April 27, 2015 Share Posted April 27, 2015 Instead of EKIA, you could rewrite that into the current PC language of the day. "Improved the lives of women and same sex couples by providing kinetic education with a 100% guaranteed non-recidivism rate." That is OUTSTANDING. I may have to work that into an OPR or decoration! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M2 Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guineapigfury Posted May 17, 2015 Share Posted May 17, 2015 I'll be emailing that hamster gif to all my friends just in case their morning hadn't been ruined. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M2 Posted May 22, 2015 Share Posted May 22, 2015 The tweeking gamer dude...WTF? BONUS: A few babes as well! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duck Posted May 22, 2015 Share Posted May 22, 2015 Ladies and gentlemen, the next generation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matmacwc Posted May 23, 2015 Share Posted May 23, 2015 He was reading his lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
pcola Posted May 23, 2015 Share Posted May 23, 2015 Idunno, I thought he was funny as hell. Comic genius. No way he hasn't put some thought into that character. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spur38 Posted May 23, 2015 Share Posted May 23, 2015 No wonder the ragheads are kicking ass! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TreeA10 Posted May 23, 2015 Share Posted May 23, 2015 Nueroscience brain mapping studies are showing that young time intensive gamers are changing up how their brains function causing depression and social interaction problems. This dude might make a good case study. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BFM this Posted May 23, 2015 Share Posted May 23, 2015 I think he was one of the sensor operators I worked with... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
17D_guy Posted May 23, 2015 Share Posted May 23, 2015 Ah, the Cyber Mecca. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
guineapigfury Posted May 23, 2015 Share Posted May 23, 2015 I think he was one of the sensor operators I worked with... At least he's not a MIC, then you'd have to go to a Bronie convention to find him in his natural habitat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timbonez Posted May 23, 2015 Share Posted May 23, 2015 I wonder if he was just trolling. He also looks like Tom Cruise. Tessa's facial expressions during that guy's monologue were pretty funny too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HerkFE Posted May 24, 2015 Share Posted May 24, 2015 (edited) http://magazine.good.is/articles/tea-never-looked-so-good Okay, I'm not smart enough to get the video in here so I posted the link. Funny as hell video comparing sexual consent with drinking tea. This should fulfill everyone's periodic SARC brief. Trust me, worth the watch. Edited May 24, 2015 by M2 Video added. Always check U-Tube! Cheers! M2 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
di1630 Posted May 24, 2015 Share Posted May 24, 2015 69x better and more useful than the current SARC brief but the stick figures are naked so this video is offensive and could cross the red line of jokes, rape, swimsuit magazines, forceable sodomy, being a pilot, etc. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sky_king Posted May 24, 2015 Share Posted May 24, 2015 The video is pretty obvious. It fails to cover, however, if one or (especially) both parties are intoxicated. That's the real gray zone. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
M2 Posted May 25, 2015 Share Posted May 25, 2015 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lawman Posted May 25, 2015 Share Posted May 25, 2015 The video is pretty obvious. It fails to cover, however, if one or (especially) both parties are intoxicated. That's the real gray zone. Yeah that's the catch 22 with all this that pisses me off. Hours and hours of having it beaten into you that a woman who even looks at alcohol is not culpable for any of her decisions and therefor is not responsible for her actions or capable of consent. But a man who gets drunk... Well he is fully responsible for his actions or misinterpretation that somehow occurred 24 hours after the fact when she decided she was raped. You don't get to have it both ways people. Predators are predators, but stop acting like two young people getting drunk and making a series of bad decisions that leads to sex is anything on the same level as forcible rape. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Goblin Posted May 28, 2015 Share Posted May 28, 2015 http://m.wftv.com/news/news/local/macdill-afb-pilot-arrested-brevard-county-during-c/nmPr2/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now