Jump to content
Baseops Forums

Majestik Møøse

Supreme User
  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


Majestik Møøse last won the day on March 24 2018

Majestik Møøse had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

417 Excellent

About Majestik Møøse

  • Rank
    Gray Beard

Recent Profile Visitors

8,621 profile views
  1. Majestik Møøse

    Flying Videos Thread Part 2?

    Protip: view in YouTube app/website so you can use the subtitle function. That dude’s Bay Area standard-issue voice is hard to listen to. The subtitles are spot on though, so it’s easy to see where YouTube’s algorithm learns its words.
  2. Majestik Møøse

    The Next President is...

    No one thinks that. No lock is unpickable, but you sure as hell want one on your door.
  3. Majestik Møøse

    The Next President is...

    Do congressional delegations get tax free when they visit a combat zone?
  4. Majestik Møøse

    What's wrong with the Air Force?

    Google definition of weapon: a thing designed or used for inflicting bodily harm or physical damage. a means of gaining an advantage or defending oneself in a conflict or contest. Definition 2 is why an aircraft without Definition 1 Weapons are considered Weapons Systems and have Weapons Instructors.
  5. Majestik Møøse

    KC-46A Info

    Air Force pilots aren’t Marine pilots. Marines have the rifleman-centric view bred into them. We’ve got a huge cultural divide between shooters and airlift/tankers in our service. There are a few gung-ho types in the MAF, but 10x more that are way more into good deals and airline prep. Which is absolutely fine, because there’s plenty of work to do for them right now without adding munitions into the mix. Hercs would be the only plausible option because other people have already paid to dev the hardware.
  6. Majestik Møøse

    AF215 Non Fillable

    Does this work using full version Acrobat (the kind on AF computers)? https://helpx.adobe.com/acrobat/how-to/convert-word-excel-paper-pdf-forms.html?set=acrobat--fundamentals--pdf-forms
  7. Majestik Møøse

    F-35 Lightning info

    No no, let’s talk around it! If the classification guide says particular capes are unclass, then we can aggregate all those capes here and discuss their employment and weaknesses!
  8. Majestik Møøse

    KC-46A Info

    I always thought the Navy used little tankers because big ones don’t fit on the boat, and if the boat used jets that didn’t fit on the boat, they’d have a hard time justifying a boat altogether.
  9. It’s the most relevant buzzword, though. A bureaucracy full of old GSs is a real problem for national security.
  10. Where do you suspect these individuals are posting their propaganda?
  11. Majestik Møøse

    F-15X on the Air Force's Budget Request

    Don’t forget C-2s and P-8s. Or maybe he’s a C-17 guy!
  12. Majestik Møøse

    STRATCOM Has a Sense of Humor, but No Balls

    Women, somewhat ironically, will straighten all this PC stuff out. When they sense a threat, they seek out protectors. When the nation and our existence seems threatened, they’ll be the first to demand men that defend them. The men’s attitudes lag a little, but the vast majority will adjust and go fight or risk not having a mate. IMO, it’s all just monkey group behavior.
  13. Majestik Møøse

    STRATCOM Has a Sense of Humor, but No Balls

    America will adapt. Hipsters are just bottling up their rage right right now.
  14. Majestik Møøse

    KC-46A Info

    Yeah, that’s what it seemed like when I was there. I don’t blame them too much, there’s a lot to learn to be the boss of an international wide-body by age 26. AC upgrade happens before anyone is truly experienced; everyone seemed scared shitless to do anything out of the norm and “get violated” by some 2nd world ATC, “combat” or not. And then there’s this: https://mobile.twitter.com/Buzz6868/status/985033590466580481
  15. Majestik Møøse

    KC-46A Info

    LO tanker isn’t really worth the cost, unless it can also drop bombs, in which case it won’t be in AMC. That said, a tanker with defensive system and Link will be a requirement considering that every piece of an IADS is mobile and easy to hide. Since the timeline math really sucks for an OCA or strike guy that has to drive 30m each way to get gas, the tankers will have to be moved well inside their current zone of comfortability. ALR Low won’t be a thing. If we’re talking a no-shitter, losing tankers to enemy action will be disturbingly regular. I’m not sure if current tanker communities are willing or able to plan or execute in that environment. They’re all great Americans and will find a way, but it’ll be painful at the very least. I welcome spears that prove me wrong.